Are some animals not "natural"?

I saw a YT video where someone brought up the idea of moths being like "evil" versions of butterflies, wasps being evil versions of bees, among others.

Could it be possible some malevolent force corrupted some animals and made them more violent and destructive to make a mockery of the original animals?

To focus on bees/wasps, bees do so much good, they pollinate, they make honey, they're usually more calm unless provoked... But wasps are like the opposite and I genuinely don't know what role they serve. They don't make honey, I'm not even sure they pollinate, and they attack unprovoked.

Another similar topic are pigs and primates. Pigs are called "abominations" in the Bible. Did God not make them? I think he could have made boars but pigs seem like a genetic creation by angels or maybe even alchemists. They have human DNA too... Monkeys could also be something like this. Cursed humans or some sort of "beastly form" for humans than used to happen. Any thoughts on this topic guys?

Say, “Shall I inform you of worse than that for retribution from God? He whom God has cursed, and with whom He became angry; and He turned some of them into apes, and swine, and idol worshipers. These are in a worse position, and further away from the right way.”

Quran 5:60

>>40657668 (OP)
>Are some animals not "natural"?
>I saw a YT video where someone brought up the idea of moths being like "evil" versions of butterflies, wasps being evil versions of bees, among others.
>Could it be possible some malevolent force corrupted some animals and made them more violent and destructive to make a mockery of the original animals?
>To focus on bees/wasps, bees do so much good, they pollinate, they make honey, they're usually more calm unless provoked... But wasps are like the opposite and I genuinely don't know what role they serve. They don't make honey, I'm not even sure they pollinate, and they attack unprovoked.
>Another similar topic are pigs and primates. Pigs are called "abominations" in the Bible. Did God not make them? I think he could have made boars but pigs seem like a genetic creation by angels or maybe even alchemists. They have human DNA too... Monkeys could also be something like this. Cursed humans or some sort of "beastly form" for humans than used to happen. Any thoughts on this topic guys?

I blame public schools. This level of ignorance has to be carefully planned.

>>40657668 (OP)
Creating a pattern means an antipattern is also created.
>>40658008
You need to go back, Akshuallyface

>>40657668 (OP)
The prevailing scientific mythology actually has it the other way around. Bees began as carnivorous wasps that went vegan as they got better at digesting pollen stuck on the insects they were eating, and then eventually butterflies originated from moths that moved away from being nocturnal to take advantage of flowers that had coevolved earlier with bees.

“Long pork” is a term for a reason, not only does pig taste like human flesh, burning pork and burning human flash smell the same. Pigs are a mockey of humans. I wont say more as to how they came about. It’s a bad thing to speak of such evils.

That being said, while leftists dont realise it, then they call someone a pig they are expressly reflecting their master who views all humans as pigs. Anyone that uses pig as a insult around you should be very wary of. Just some basic advice.

>>40657668 (OP)
Ant face under electron microscope

>>40658577
Amazing really that there is all this detail that goes unseen around us

>>40658042
>You need to go back, Akshuallyface
^^^^dysgenic hands typed this. Another beige zoomer dumbfuck who thinks watching tik tok is doing research.

>>40658577
this nigga lookin shifty. untrustworthy. devious.

>>40658791
>Muh expert peer review trusted research from muh tv screen makes me smart when I try to insult you
Do you know where you are muthafukka? You are on /x/ muthafukka. Do you know what /x/ is muthafukka? You need the access rights to your own brain to reply here muthafukka.

>>40658577
fuckers really do enjoy biting our legs

>>40657668 (OP)
You can just Google wasps and find out things like what they eat, their habits, and so on.

nice brainrot

>>40658577
You photoshopped iris’s onto its eyes.
I think the face like structure they possessed was obvious anyway, but you cheapened it somehow

Of course. How could someone look at a scorpion and assume that it wasn’t some God’s attempt at making the scariest bug ever?

>>40660480
>>40658791
nah, both of you are stupid as fuck. One of you for thinking moths are evil (lol) and the other for hating those younger than him (aka letting those who want to divide us win)

>>40657668 (OP)
some plants are pollinated by wasps, and they are a part of the balance of the ecosystem.
I cant think of any animal who's existence is purely destructive, this theory is literally just based on how much you like an animal

>>40657668 (OP)
your biology is poor, wasps are the wolves of the insect kingdom, they eat the young of aphids ticks and mosquitos, they will never bother you if your dietary ph is high.
as to your dna rant on pigs, theres a snail that lives on deep sea volcanic vents, it makes a foot of iron, it has no dna you dont - pigs are fallen humans though, dat long pork

>>40657668 (OP)
how is a moth evil pray tell

>>40658847
Lol

>>40657998

>>40657668 (OP)
and Jews are evil version of humans

>>40663446
I actually like moths but I get the idea behind the polarity.
>Moths eat and destroy fabrics while butterflies literally dont harm anything
>Moths are night creatures opposed to the day-living butterfly
>Butterfly wings are beautiful and vibrant with pleasant patterns, moth wings are dull and grey/brown with sometimes very unsettling patterns. Also butterfly wings rest sitting upright and moth wings rest down, a literal up vs down dynamic
Most of this isn't "evil" but it's definitely worth noting that it seems moths are meant as a night/dark counterpart to the butterfly.

>>40664176

The young of butterflies can harm crops and they typically eat plants. A few are even carnivores.

>>40658288
From darkness into light.
Some people think that big felines are all properly, properly dangerous and can't be messed with, that they're dangerous to handle, dangerous to see, dangerous to be around.
The stories of man-eating tigers are loud and proud.
Then one day man takes a nap in the savannah of Africa and wakes up with 3 cheetahs purring beside him, and when they notice he's awake they go "meow" and like to be petted.
Man mounts his chariot for the hunt and the cheetahs follow him, they hunt game with him. He shoots one animal with his bow while the cheetahs pounce on another.
They exchange meat from their prey with each other and become best frens.

God fucking forbid you try that shit with lions and tigers.

>>40663051
>part of the balance of the ecosystem
Slightly unrelated but that reminded me of the foolishness of some people.
They mention that, the delicate balance of the ecosystem, as if it is impossible for the ecosystem to adapt to any changes on a dime despite centuries of evidence proving the contrary.

>>40657668 (OP)
>Could it be possible some malevolent force corrupted some animals and made them more violent and destructive to make a mockery of the original animals?
Yeah just look at humans.
Aryans/Nips/Chinese and Jews/Niggers/Jeets.

brother i hate to break it to you but butterflies evolved from moths.