Is god protecting me from dying?

>>40663064 (OP)
I hope so

>>40663064 (OP)
More like keeping you alive to ensure a steady-stream of loosh from all the torture

>>40663070
Me too.

>>40663073
This is unecessary negativity, don't listen to it.

>>40663070
>>40663190
Thank you.

>>40663064 (OP)
The like cradle of your mothers arms.

>>40663064 (OP)
if you were a buddha you wouldn't worry of dying at all

>>40664015
So its impossible to be a buddha?

>>40663064 (OP) Yes, and you have no reason to ask and you know it. So, use your time/life carefully.

>>40664743
I don't know about that, but I stopped worrying about death after confronting multiple sclerosis. I cured myself too. Meditation is a game changer for a lot of auto immune conditions.

>>40663190
What's wrong about the post though. God, objectively speaking, wants a much suffering as possible or the world would have been created very differently.
> inb4 some ChristCuckery
The very concept of suffering wouldn't exist if God didn't create it so don't come at me with all that bullshit.
> inb4 some free will bullshit
So in the next life you are nothing but a slave? because the bible states suffering will be gone.

>>40666944
Suffering is a prerequisite for multicellular life, as we require it to account for ourselves without fully knowing ourselves. Yes, God chose for cells to work together (as is apparent if you believe in God), but everything else you said is philosophical bullshit.

>>40666954
God could have created cells without the need for suffering. You could create a game where nothing dies or experiences pain or has to suffer injustices while having free will within the confines of the reality you create, why can't this God/universe/what ever you call it? It is because it is evil to it's core.
> Philosophy bullshit
You're on /x/. Address the argument instead of attacking ad hominem, you already lost. Scurry off if you have nothing to say.

>>40666980
>God could have created cells without the need for suffering.
Yes, but then they would not have the potential free will / the ability to account for themselves.
>God could make it so they do anyway
Then we'd be living in a paradox where suffering and pain are interchangeable and a matter of per... hey, wait a second!

>>40667003
You miss the point. Place yourself in the position of God, where you can do anything, you can create something that is both dry and wet simultaneously. Paradoxes are only paradoxes because you make them so, you can do all things, and things that a human mind cannot comprehend as it does not have the senses or architecture in its being to understand it. All things are possible until you deem them not possible. The qualities of this reality are consequences of choices placed upon it by the creator (be that God, evolution, what ever you want to call it) and all religions, mystics, nde's, trippers etc etc state there are other realms where suffering need not exist for beings within those realms to have all the qualities of free will, autonomy, ability to learn, grow etc.

Now you are God, you can easily just create those beings there, having all the free will etc etc that they would have here (in fact it would be no more trouble than creating them here because you are all powerful) but instead you choose to place them in the hell dimension you dreamed up. That reflects poorly on God's aims and intentions in regards to humanity, where the default state for the masses is suffering. The universe does not want to you to be happy, without suffering.

This is not a good place. It is not necessary for learning or soul building etc etc. Its only purpose is to take conscious beings and to inflict pain upon them.

>>40667086
>Paradoxes are only paradoxes because you make them so
The liar's paradox was not created by anyone, it is simply a logical conclusion of binary states and their analysis over time. Even if everyone forgot it existed it would remain as a paradox in this world, so no, it cannot be that paradoxes are simply what we make them. I get the sentiment, that logical contexts are constructed, but take it a step further - constructed from what? Known relationships ie truth, and unknown relationships ie propositions.

>you can easily just create those beings there
Everything I create has the implications of that creation, and creating caveats produces even more implications in its contexts. Do I want to create life with free will? Well, then I need it to be able to account for itself and its surroundings. Do I want it to be successful on its own, ie not a parasite? Then it needs suffering.
>God can just change that
Not without giving up everything else that was decided, as it accounts for itself.

>>40667135
So God doesn't create all things? That's an interesting take. God must created if we extrapolate that logic out as God is no longer the source so we would be crediting the wrong thing as God. But again, you're thinking from within your box and refusing to go outside of it. Suffering == free will is only true as a consequence of the arbitrary rules God places its creation, the consequences of actions are arbitrary, those consequences can be completely different if God wills it. There are realities where jumping backwards throws you left because of the arbitrarily rules of those realms. If free will and suffering are interlinked it is only because God willed it to be that way. Any other stance would say that you're not talking about God as the same concept I am, yours is limited, mine is not.

>>40667184
>So God doesn't create all things?
Obviously. If I make a fajita God only provided the ingredients. I did the creating.
>But again, you're thinking from within your box
Then you do not see where I am thinking. There are no boxes here. Categories are illusions.
>those consequences can be completely different if God wills it.
God cannot will that I simultaneously do and do not have free will. Either I have the experience of it or I do not. No amount of omnipotence can change this without changing me and therefor making the question null and void.

>>40667208
Your first point says everything. We are not on the same page. Your God isn't the all powerful source that is everything. Until you can understand that is what God is then this is pointless. Once God is everything and limitations are arbitrary you're ready to look at the bullshit that this world is. Until then you do you, i will never be able to convince you with words. You win.

>>40667226
>Your God isn't the all powerful source that is everything.
Yes, it is. That you do not understand this is why we are not on the same page. You confuse all powerful with having all possible powers simultaneously.

>>40667237
That is all powerful. You cant comprehend all powerful so you cannot limit it. All powerful can do all things, even things that are contradictory and break logic, physics, reality in general etc etc.

>>40667247
>That is all powerful.
No, that's just a flimsy human ideal of power, the sort of thing that leads to the very paradoxes of morality you are so consumed by.

>>40667254
Ok cool. Your concept of God is more like some sort of powerful anime character bound by it's creation and it's side effects. You're right and you win.

>>40663064 (OP)
NO! Don't expect any miracles to keep you alive! If you let your guard down because of "God's protection", then you are potentially in serious trouble!

OP here.
Just realized god was protecting me from joining an Indian street gang in Canada.

>>40663064 (OP)
Probably, since you're alive

>>40667269
No, it comes from the definition of God as the embodiment of truth (a matter of gospel). While your concept of God comes from philosophical thought experiments in 1700s.

>>40668526
Cops are corrupt.

>>40663064 (OP)
Every second you live, yes. He's willing you to continue existing.

>>40670052
You're right, I was!
I'm currently in a druglords territory blasting ESF masta buildas.

>>40673982
>>40673982
Thank you, God.

>>40663064 (OP)
Yes.
Lmk when youre ready

very hard to say. life isn't good and I work hard and other people do bad stuff. But if I summed it all up and added in my own negativity n shit at times then perhaps I could say I got lucky if I look at it a certain way. I've been given much more than I could handle, and I'm disfigured at this point but I'm still alive. But I see how shit ends up even more stupid for a lot of people. I'm not even on the edge, I'm hanging by a tree on the way down, but there are a lot of people way down at the bottom already totally dead

>>40673960
Thank you.