>>40679894 (OP)
When was that? Mine is picrel

>>40679894 (OP)

I don’t really understand how this happens if all of the number generators are random.

>>40679894 (OP)
Thats just someone turning it off and on again.

Complete list of times the meme dot has meant something:

>>40680179
People can actively change odds of random number generators using their consciousness, it is scientifically proven. However, this change is so small it is basically negligible.
The hypothesis of the GCP is that when many people align their consciousness to one subject, it results in an actual noticeable shift to random number generation variances, i.e. a non-random result.
However, there is no guarantee it is not just noise, and a lucky moment. If spikes happen multiple times in a 12 hour period, the likelyhood of these events being entirely randomly generated approaches the territory of "so improbable it is literally impossible", like 1/10000000000000000 or in other words it is more likely that you yourself will be struck by lightning indoors while in a gangbang with four men at this very present moment.

>>40680402
>it is scientifically proven.

You wouldn't happen to have a paper or study on that, would you?

IP harvesting, is why the images don't match.

>>40680478
its on the cunting website the cap is from you retard

>>40680696
>Getting this defensive over a question
>Doesn't post a study
So it was bullshit then?

>>40680701
Study my balls

>>40680708
What do you get out of lying about bullshit? Do you think it makes you feel smart to say it was scientifically proven with no basis?

>>40680717
I can scientifically prove you should suck my balls, but I'm not gonna.

>>40680717
There are actual ‘studies’ (although very much challenged by other scientists) done by Dean Radin. The studies show that your consciousness has a tiny effect on quantum random number generators. The effect is super tiny though and involves a lot of complicated math and statistics. I find it fairly bullshit since the effect is TINY, I don’t know if the studies have ever been replicated and since they’re using complicated math (for something seeming simply) it would be easy to skew the numbers in either direction.

I've wanted to get around to coding my own "schizo dot" website but there's no money in it so I never do. It would be based on conversations on known schizo sites like /x/ and a few other dens I know of. It would measure sentiment of their conversations to create a "doom score" or something.

Skykang, do you copy?

>>40680179
>I don’t really understand how this happens if all of the number generators are random.
Theoretically, random numbers can be manipulated by the human mind. As the other guy said, there's info online. Just search. I'll throw you a bone:
https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14293/PR2199.001077.v1
This is just a minor open source paper. If you're interested, do your homework. There's a fuck ton of material to cover.

REGARDLESS, it's pointless to speculate what's happening as the data and protocols behind the actual GCP dot is, AFAIK, hidden.

For this GCP to be take even remotely seriously, they need transparency. They need to publish the raw data, the raw data measurement conditions and the data processing algorithms. In the current format, the GCP dot is meaningless.

>there's people on /x/ who deny the dot

you're so far behind it's not even funny

spirit gang

Sell.

dot gang dot gang

>>40680735
You need to be 18 to post on 4chan.

>>40680827
This doesn't sound replicable.

>>40681179
If you're 18 that means you can legally suck my balls repicablly.

>>40681221
This schizo-meltdown is adorable.
So anyways what do you get out of lying? Or are you just going to keep repeating the same thing?

>>40680827
>the effect is TINY
And if billions of people are aligned and focused on one out come, then what?

>>40680478
>>40680701
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357902344_Minding_the_Matter_of_Psychokinesis_A_Review_of_Proof-_and_Process-Oriented_Experimental_Findings_Related_to_Mental_Influence_on_Random_Number_Generators
>picrel

>>40680273
you forgot the list?
>1998 embassy bombings
p=0.001 (0.1% chance of random numbers randomly aligning with the event)
>international peace day 2011
p=0.001
>indonesian earthquakes of 2005
p=0.002
>valentine meditations 2009
p=0.002
>climate and peace 2014
p=0.003
>lovewave 010101
p=0.004
https://noosphere.princeton.edu/results.html

if you just had a handful of these correlations you could easily dismiss them as coincidence. but autists have meticulously documented hundreds of them. at a certain point it becomes naive to insist they're all coincidences

>>40680179
Apparently RNG synchronization have occurred before major tragedies, i.e. 9/11
That is, all the machine RNGs started throwing the same numbers
I suppose at what intervals, every 60 seconds? Every 10? On demand/command? Hmm
>>40680898
This anon is right. Without knowing the algorithm behind it, it's meaningless.
Apparently the odds of influencing a machine to give you a number are greater than 50%...
There was a website which pulled numbers based on radio noise, static. I forget. It was made to be "true" rng.

>>40681237
I just like replying to 4chan posts.

>>40681344
did none of you niggers read the 3 page explanation? each of their hundreds of "nodes" or "eggs" incorporate an industrially accepted source of randomness. they're not windows xp computers runing the same program, they're expensive bits of hardware drawing from electromagnetic fluctuations, thermal noise, zener diodes, clock drift, etc

https://global-mind.org/science2.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_random_number_generator?useskin=vector#Physical_phenomena_with_random_properties

>>40679915
right after the oct 7th attacks

>>40680827
The effects become larger if the person is an experienced meditator. And much, much larger in other cases you will never know about.

>>40681287
>that list
Jesus Christ, that's huge.
>no replies
When the cognitive dissonance hits, suddenly they are unable to even acknowledge your post.