random /x/ related images - /x/ (#40687413) [Archived: 559 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/9/2025, 9:13:28 AM No.40687413
xnte
xnte
md5: 4901d5a0c69a57b4489af239005b5eb6🔍
I mean nah, this is a totally normal smile isn't it?
Replies: >>40687421 >>40687607
Anonymous
7/9/2025, 9:15:43 AM No.40687421
>>40687413 (OP)
I've seen this clip everywhere and no one brings up how fucking creepy his smile is, and then the fact that one of his victims saw him flicker back and forth between a dragon whilst orgasming. no coincidence he has that fucking smile
Replies: >>40687472
Anonymous
7/9/2025, 9:26:20 AM No.40687472
1752031251593694
1752031251593694
md5: 55e807afbdd7131fbac9e0384f2d7450🔍
>>40687421
>one of his victims saw him flicker back and forth between a dragon whilst orgasming

Interesting for sure

pic unrelated
Anonymous
7/9/2025, 9:26:32 AM No.40687473
9D8B22E3-A1AC-46E6-B09F-C6A425A6DFB6
9D8B22E3-A1AC-46E6-B09F-C6A425A6DFB6
md5: 360d040f436d56f85f95bc35bca6a38d🔍
Replies: >>40687542
Anonymous
7/9/2025, 9:47:33 AM No.40687542
>>40687473
Yeah his 'upside down' smile. Interesting.
Anonymous
7/9/2025, 9:53:55 AM No.40687554
joker-nicholson
joker-nicholson
md5: 715123dd46e29998e6a437c694045ab6🔍
Uncanny

Demonic souls tend to manifest with physical traits
Replies: >>40687580
Anonymous
7/9/2025, 10:02:43 AM No.40687580
4d5d35afccd1d562350c0000
4d5d35afccd1d562350c0000
md5: 4ac561a4f11fd60a17575307117b7d5e🔍
>>40687554
Well sir, this is obviously special effects from a film. But yeah I have heard what you mentioned stated before. What about the inverse of this phenomenon? Extreme symmetrical/sculpted looking beings? Cosmetic surgery in humans aside, how common is precise symmetry I wonder? It makes me think of machines.
Anonymous
7/9/2025, 10:09:06 AM No.40687592
just say you hate jews
Anonymous
7/9/2025, 10:14:20 AM No.40687607
>>40687413 (OP)
He's not dead. Ghislaine was never in prison. 90% of Congress is on the list. All the presidents in modern history are compromised by communists and are this shabbos goyim.

Also, the released footage is AI. There is no missing minute. Just remember they said the cameras were inoperable. Remember Epstein "killed himself" shortly after Trump's name appeared on a leaked flight log.
Replies: >>40687725 >>40688486
Anonymous
7/9/2025, 10:51:18 AM No.40687725
1752049335900543m
1752049335900543m
md5: 6852e83079a851d4bc2430a972745277🔍
>>40687607
It's not even a video of Epstein's cell

Just some random common area
Replies: >>40688486
Anonymous
7/9/2025, 3:23:31 PM No.40688486
>>40687607
>>40687725
Coffeezilla has a more intelligent analysis of the footage, showing where it's actually from and what you're looking at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWRHtp4FeFU

I work in electronic security and it's not uncommon for DVR systems to automatically reboot every day or week to avoid the same kind of issues your computer has if it stays on too long, especially older systems, and might take a minute or two to boot up again.

That detail is at least plausible but still a hard sell to the public under the circumstances. Not to mention that knowing the system was down for that period of time at exactly that time seems pretty fucking exploitable. I don't go announcing to world when my systems are doing it and set it for periods when it's likely to matter the least.

What's odd is it rebooting before 12:00 instead of starting the reboot exactly at 12:00. I could believe it's a default value, but a lot of systems you can only select a specific hour, on the hour - not 11:59 or some shit. So a lot of problems with that version of events too.

You'd have to believe:

>someone manually chose to set the time for 11:59, or it was some kind of unusual default value, (plausible, but checkable if we know the system)
>It just so happened to take almost exactly a minute to reboot, (plausible but kinda weird)
>the other camera was not working, (not uncommon), but wasn't a priority to fix with Epstein there
>nobody knew about, understood, and intentionally exploited this predictable downtime

But I think Coffeezilla is implying they said it was only missing those minutes for the last ten days, so that's either wrong because of technical illiteracy, they were looking at the stored footage and it only goes back that long, (about the memory capacity you might get with some off-the-shelf systems) OR that's an extremely implausible technical issue for a system like this to have.

Either way a lot of people involved who don't understand the technical shit.
Replies: >>40688501
Anonymous
7/9/2025, 3:29:21 PM No.40688501
>>40688486
Also to be fair rebooting could lose previous footage so it might appear to stop prior to 12:00 even if it rebooted at 12:00 exactly, but you see the problem with that. It was back up at exactly 12:00:00, and it can't have shut down and instantly rebooted. So that time raises more questions than it answers.

It's like some perfectly timed reboot so it would come back on at exactly 12:00:00.

So while it's not uncommon to lose a minute or two around the hour, nothing really makes sense about it in this case.