>>40687607>>40687725Coffeezilla has a more intelligent analysis of the footage, showing where it's actually from and what you're looking at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWRHtp4FeFU
I work in electronic security and it's not uncommon for DVR systems to automatically reboot every day or week to avoid the same kind of issues your computer has if it stays on too long, especially older systems, and might take a minute or two to boot up again.
That detail is at least plausible but still a hard sell to the public under the circumstances. Not to mention that knowing the system was down for that period of time at exactly that time seems pretty fucking exploitable. I don't go announcing to world when my systems are doing it and set it for periods when it's likely to matter the least.
What's odd is it rebooting before 12:00 instead of starting the reboot exactly at 12:00. I could believe it's a default value, but a lot of systems you can only select a specific hour, on the hour - not 11:59 or some shit. So a lot of problems with that version of events too.
You'd have to believe:
>someone manually chose to set the time for 11:59, or it was some kind of unusual default value, (plausible, but checkable if we know the system)>It just so happened to take almost exactly a minute to reboot, (plausible but kinda weird)>the other camera was not working, (not uncommon), but wasn't a priority to fix with Epstein there>nobody knew about, understood, and intentionally exploited this predictable downtimeBut I think Coffeezilla is implying they said it was only missing those minutes for the last ten days, so that's either wrong because of technical illiteracy, they were looking at the stored footage and it only goes back that long, (about the memory capacity you might get with some off-the-shelf systems) OR that's an extremely implausible technical issue for a system like this to have.
Either way a lot of people involved who don't understand the technical shit.