Anonymous
7/9/2025, 11:49:12 PM No.40691036
Julius Caesar came before Jesus, JC used to stand for Julius Caesar, Jesus is very much more modern invention (maybe didn't even exist?). Something about Julius Caesar history was inconvenient, so they wanted to muddy the water by adding a newer Jesus. Problem with Jesus is that there's no oral teaching telling the story of jesus (I'm of opinion a well preserved oral teaching is more reliable than written text), it relies heavily on invention of printing and distribution of books (namely bible). Does this ring any bells to you? Because it's direct paralel to the invention of television. I'm suggesting that both TV and advent of printing share same goal, indoctrination and propaganda of the masses (extra points of sus for bible being the first book that went into widespread distribution). That's why I'm saying a book about jesus is just as credible source as a television show about jesus. You have to ask yourself, if you're a white person/european, how come there's no oral teaching about jesus in your culture? And why should you believe a book about a person which doesn't have oral teaching in your culture/society? Either some kind of flood happened or some inconvenient figure showed up sometime in history, and that figure had to be memory holed (caesar or someone else), so they have had to edit/erase large portion of history, and that's why Jesus story was invented afterwards in an attempt to patch that hole.
Replies: