>>40698826clearly youve never heard of the streisand effect.
truth is, they're a bunch of affluent old men drinking and talking about philosophy and secular age debauchery. it's not in any way how alex jones or other conspiritards put it, but, it is the root of more than a few misunderstandings proliferation; most of which follows the masonic esoterica on tauroctony.
theyre just a bunch of old men who see america as "better rome."
its not new for rich men to talk about their tastes and appetites, hell, thats kind of the whole reason this hasnt been dealt with; because they leave off on an assumption that you have to "sacrifice" your worries (aka cares) of being perfect in order to *strive for perfection.*
a lot of people miss the key on this, because it goes without saying; just because something *can* be accepted and or integrated *does not mean it should,* especially when they're implying that catharsis comes from the ability to integrate, and not from the actual integration itself.
they, unfortunately, as a lot of men do, uphold the roman model of purity that was foisted on the world by an empire with a long-standing culture of state-sanctioned depravity.
so, to them, domination becomes ritual, submission becomes spectacle, and this binary creates the illusion of harmony that allows things to go unaddressed so long as they can be denied.
mind you; this isnt just the bohemian club, this is the longstanding culmination of american enlightenment rationalism, where they sought to secularize the concept of self and state in a way where the individual could exist free from the jurisdiction of the state-sanctioned churches of england.
the big big caveat here; we can only do that within the bounds of what we're willing to be remembered for, lest we not be remembered for who we truly were at all.