What are they, what are they used against and where can I go to find out more?

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335271748_Magnetic_Wave_Transmission_of_Drug_Effects_about_the_Waves_Generated_in_the_Measurement_Set-Up_and_Used_ie_for_Anticancer-Treatments#pf4
https://www.meyl.eu/go/indexb830.html

>>40707937
Thanks anon

>>40707872 (OP)
Ppl that climb up ur house and into ur window and kill u

>>40707872 (OP)
I literally just proved that these things are possible in multiple threads. (Call me Soph). It's literally just heating up carbon to an order of magnitude to create some exotic isomer (say, 4000-10000°K in an arc furnace), then using a substrate to cool it off. That'll add a billion or so c atoms ontop of regular c. That could be used as a room temperature superconductor. Why? Because heat does that on the molecular level.

>>40708170
Also, "carbon" is a fundamental element needex for life. Tesla idealized it, I proved it.

>>40708170
What cooling rate. Then what do u do with the superconductor to make a scalar wave

>>40708205
Well, you program it like a regular quantum computer (laser+MRI+laptop+debugger+gnu+python+qiskit) and you cool it off via programming software + calabi-yau manifolds (assuming it has more carbon atoms than in the known universe, which would create a singularity if you didn't control it, and to that could be used for interdimensional travel and tachyonic-level computation, say, adding a googolplex c atoms).

>>40708234
*you program the quantum entanglement capacitors for your laser like a regular quantum computer
But that's if you wanted, say, a googolplex c atoms. If only a billion - liquid nitrogen.

>>40708170
4000-10000°K would be if you wanted to throw in a billion though. If googolplex, that would exceed temperatures allowed in space under ordinary physics unless you programmed flow control in the quantum entanglement capacitors.

>>40708265
That would both allow it to exceed space-heat limits and cool it off at the same time so it isn't actually thay hot either ("flow control").

>>40707872 (OP)
As far as I've been able to tell a "scalar" wave originated as a mistranslation. It could have meant standing wave, soliton, or as the result of "static" electricity.

>>40708275
Also, you could use ordinary supercapacitors if you wanted to make a billion c isomer also, but if googolplex, you'll need quantum entanglement capacitors made from the 1-billion c isomer,which in-theory, a googolplex isomer would be limited by logic only - not matter. Compare me to a 1-googolplex isomer and "God/YHVH" to a 1-billion isomer. A googolplex isomer can hold an infinite amount of qubits. A billion c atoms arrayed can create new universes and act as an actualized intelligent source ("intelligent design") although, like Ted Stevens said - the internet itself is a series of tubes (it's not something that you just dump something on"). I'll call this "the Stevens Corollary." Real-life is not a trash can - you don't just dump shit on it and expect it to work. So no, a "manmade God" is still bound by human reasoning. I'm above even God almighty, so I know the logic of this universe. Scalar fields are real and so are tachyonic fields (your soul).

happy to look into this after coffee.

>>40708308
Not matter of THIS universe, that is, but see, you also have "exotic" matter and "mystic" matter (what I'm made of). It's glaringly obvious that you can go from 3D to 10D. How do we know "interdimensional travel" is real? YOU'RE LOOKING AT IT! Information would not be able to travel through a medium (camera, phone, TV) if "interdimensional travel" were false.

>>40708316
Also the reason you "can't see" God is because of the encryption in the Matrix software, but "reality" is a dæmon, because of how its setup as an "equalizer" (or game of chance). That's the only way life can happen - it's distributed. And bypassing atoms in space = decrypting it (ie trans-universal speeds and so on).

>>40708350
It demonstrates a "snow globe" effect. Also "artifical intelligence" in a computer, digital or quantun, is still human intelligence, because it's bound by the three principles (analog, digital and quantum). So no, you cannot "overthrow God" either.

>>40708316
If tachyons (faster-than-light) particles "did not exist" you wouldn't have cell phones or any technology whatsoever. Why? Well, here's an example - your soul. What is it made out of? Tachyons. Why? Well, let's say they were made out of photons (regular lightspeed or c as the expression goes). If you died, you would never reach heaven under an expanding universe (it'll contract/shut-in eventually - probably a supermassive black hole). For example, Alpha Centauri is 4 lightyears away. To go from point A to point B traveling at only lightspeed, it would take you 4 years.

>>40708415
0-bit information is what closes everything in (a "container" of reality). It's endless recursion.

>>40708170
>I literally just proved that these things are possible in multiple threads
No you didn't.

>>40709122
Theoretical proof is still proof. Fuck around and find out. Really, a lot of this stuff is already known anyways with what I just said.

>>40709153
>Theoretical proof is still proof.
nope

>>40709174
Here's an experiment you csn try: take your smartphone, and when you go to snap a selfie, have the side that reflects you face the mirror, have the camera on front end activated so you can see where your face is at and snap a selfie - classic recursion in effect ("Spinoza's Substance" = me).