Magic is practical metaphysics. Why? Because theoretical metaphysics has absolutely no real life practical applications. If there is only one theoretical metaphysics (which I believe is the one in picrel), is there only one practical metaphysics?

>>40728798 (OP)
>(which I believe is the one in picrel)
Too hylic. Go back to Plotinus and Iamblichus.

>>40729463
If you say so. What's your answer to the question?

>>40728798 (OP)
I've been thinking the same thing anon. Euler's models are a bit weird. You would need to distinguish between principles (elements) and concepts (compounds) in order to get a clearer picture of your worldview.

Also, don't try and mix metaphysics with ethics until you have a really solid foundation. Platonism is a fine place to start but their goal was a lot less pragmatic than what you seem to be aiming for.

>>40728798 (OP)
>If
>>40729650
>If
So basically it is all about ifs?

>>40728798 (OP)
Bump for being one of the best threads here

>>40737102
yea, bump too