It’s time to stop.
It’s not that I am God.

It’s that God is me.
It’s not We’re all God.
It’s that God is you.

If you don’t understand the difference, well get to understanding it!

>>40744749 (OP)
I prefer to say it like this.
God is always with me, always kind to me, and always gentle with me, because God loves me more than everything else put together, and that doesn't mean he loves me any more than he loves you.
That's the kind of God I believe in.

>>40744804
That’s nice. The only sticking point is the last part. We can’t help but think God loves me more. There is a wrong way and there is a right way, but God exists in both for a reason

>>40744749 (OP)
I always say it like the Holy Spirit is working through me. Honestly no other way to without blaspheming. Worship Jesus.

>>40745007
That’s not a bad way to put it

I am God I invented the universe

>>40745081
No

>>40745182
yes

>>40744749 (OP)
When God is me does it stop being God?

>>40745277
Yes you stop being God. Because God is the whole. You are a fragment. But it’s ok. Fragments have bad undertones. You are a fragment yes but of Something Special.

>>40744995

>>40745277
God becomes me. That says everything.
But it’s ok. I’m fragment, but I’m a fragment of something eternal

>>40745394
I bring only knowledge

>>40745395
It's a yes or no question

>>40745665
It’s a yes or no question if you’re a lawyer.
If God is me, I am God and God is me. Can an unlimited thing be limited?

>>40745665
>When God is me does it stop being God?
It’s a yes and no question. But yes, God stops being God when he becomes you. God is me, is something.
God is god, is not a change

>>40745665
And you’re not a lawyer, stop pretending to be. Don’t limit yourself to yes or no. God is you, but no need to limit yourself more than necessary

>>40744749 (OP)
God is the ground and source of all states of awareness, including those experienced by this bodymind.

>the hewbew god.

>>40745745
>yes, God stops being God when he becomes you.
So I am Not-God then?
Where's the no?

>>40745762
While in this form I communicate in words. Words have meaning, if you are a lawyer or not.
>God is you, but no need to limit yourself
So I am God then? That doesn't sound limiting.

>>40745863
Your original question was phrased like this: When God is me does it stop being God? So my answer was yes.

> So I am God then? That doesn't sound limiting.
Look at my op post thanks.

>>40745863
Your original question was phrased like this: When God is me does it stop being God? So my answer was yes.

> So I am God then? That doesn't sound limiting.
No God is you. There’s a difference. Aka my op post. And don’t be lawyer. If you want paperwork done efficiently words are great. If you want truth, words are extremely limited. It’s usually yes and no, not yes or not.

>>40745825
Yes. The beauty of zen

>>40744995
That's now how I meant it at all.
The end was an intentional twist, a clever semantic inversion.
What do you get when you put everything else together?

>>40746296
I can’t reframe in my own way. The definition seems good the way it is. Universal Love? I agree with you.

>>40744749 (OP)
It's time to stop caring about words that can have the same meaning backwards or forwards. It's the intent behind the words.

Additionally it's time to stop telling others how to think, let them think they are god.

I am made from god, I am god, god is me, god is apart of me, I am apart of god, we are gods, we are godly, the rock is god, all is god. With intent all these mean the same thing.

It would be wiser to make awareness to ones ego ,that they should be careful in thinking they are above anyone else including god.

If god is all then how can you not be all of god and if you are all of god how are you not god. You are gods creations thus you are the son of God as Jesus was.

>>40746687
When we say the phrase I am God, half the people roll their eyes and ignore, and the other half is full of abrahamics who will just boo you for proclaiming to be God himself. Only like 0.01% know your intent. So actually no, the intent does not come through. People just strawman spiritual folks and attack us for having a big ego. We might in fact be pushing people away by saying I am God. Also, another thing I am God makes sense only on the other side. In the material world, the God/Us unity is displayed only in the phrase God is me and God is you. Spiritual concepts go through a “3D translation.” God is me is a 3D version of I am God. Just like codependency is a 3D version of the spiritual Empaths. Empaths don’t have a special organ, they manifest as empaths through 3D experiences called codependency. (So if people tell you you’re not a empath, you’re just codependent—they’re the same thing just spiritual/material).

>It would be wiser to make awareness to ones ego ,that they should be careful in thinking they are above anyone else including god.
This is a issue. You are seeing it. So that’s good.

>>40746857
God knows the intent, god can see pasts the 0.01%. God knows the heart.

However all you speak is true.

The concern comes from the statements "It's time to stop".

I am unsure if it is right to tell anyone how they should think of god.
I have a belief that religion/spirituality/god is wholly a personal inner journey.
And the books and scriptures exist for those who want to seek it further.

I am unsure if human to human verbiage is wise for true knowing/understanding is from within.


"Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine..."
(Matthew 7:6)

“You are not a controller over them.”
(Surah Al-Ghashiyah 88:22)

“Your duty is only to convey the message.”
(Surah Ash-Shura 42:48)

>>40747132
Yes maybe shutting the door like that is unnecessary. I wouldn’t like that myself.

Tu perrosidad, es grande

Tu perrosidad, incomparable es

Nadie como tú, bendito Scoobs

Grande es tu perrosidad

>>40744749 (OP)
When someone says "i am God" what they mean is God came into them for 30 seconds looking for residence and found none so he shook up their world a little bit then dipped out. now the "i am God"s desperately project their insecurity of being an empty tool onto others by trying to fool us into acting like tools for their own will.

>>40747404
and of course God found residence in you right? let me guess, because you "accepted Jesus in your heart"?

>>40745989
Right. John Doe is not God. God is John Doe. So John Doe's actual identity, his "I am", at the deepest level is... God?

this God stuff is like The Ring

the only important thing is that "I will be dead before I see the ring in the hands of a fag, I mean an elf!"

you call yourself God all you want, that doesnt mean shit to me, all of you are fucking retards, God or not

>>40747419
I had him with me for 43 days which im pretty sure is a high score for goyim. I blew it because I thought my own little mind games of spiritual 1upmanship would work if I could use the holy spirit. I was wrong and God dipped out, he was as gentle as possible but the dread will fuck me up for decades. He reminded me of the kikes who held onto it for hundreds of years father to son and that my son will have his own chance to redeem us. having Jesus in my heart made me suitable to meet the men who would teach me to build a temple where God could kick back and having Jesus helped me walk the valley of the shadow of death by faith. Jesus is for us orphans, if youre so slick try to build an innermost sanctuary without Christ, let us know how it goes.

>>40747446
You could go your whole life without this discussion and be fine. But if you have this discussion you’ll be better than fine. The point of suffering is to understand others. When you understand others, you are growing that much more into God. The more you avoid understanding others, the more you invite illness and suffering. In fact that’s the only point of illness and suffering.
You’re right too. Don’t get to deep into it but keep the above in mind

>>40747421
Nicely stated indeed

>>40747404
No the I am Gods do have the right idea. My opinion is really that they’re communicating … non-optimally. Because as your comment shows, I am God draws accusations of being insecure or egotistical. I am God is more clear if you’re on hallucinogenic, less clear when sober

>>40747622
>I am God is more clear if you’re on hallucinogenic, less clear when sober
You know the exact same thing happens with a woman's beauty.
When you are really drunk, you can see how beautiful a woman is, but when you sober up suddenly she is an ugly hambeast.

>>40744749 (OP)
The difference is "you" or "yuh" "Yugh"