Flat Earth this. Flat Earth that. Why not bring geocentrism back instead?

*stares*

>>40798392 (OP)
Well I mean.. Do you think the universe ends?
Or not?
Which idea is weirder /x/?

>>40798392 (OP)
the person who made that just swapped the sun with the earth and moon and called it done.

>>40798392 (OP)
Because geocentrism is true, and works.
Because geocentrism is simply an exercise in relativity.
Declaring Earth as the inertial frame of reference means it doesnt move, and everyhting else does.
you can do this with any mass.
But some masses as the immovable center make for more complicated models than others.
Doesnt make it wrong, just makes it less useful.
Geocentrism is GREAT for figuring out where things are in relation to the Earth.
It is very bad for figuring out anything else with celestial motion.
Another issue is that geocentrism REQUIRES the Earth to be round for it to work.

>>40798602
>Geocentrism is an exercise in relativity.
That one works for ONE of the two scenarios I posited.
So which is it?
Ends?
Doesnt end?

>>40798625
>the two scenarios I posited.
What two scenarios? No mention in OP and you are not important enough to go back and read every post.
Go ahead and repost a tl;dr, if you think what you said was relevant enough to keep talking about it.

>>40798632
You're a little slow aren't you?
You know what, stick with that geocentric model buddy, it suits you.

>>40798664
>no scenarios given
They must have been irrelevant.

>>40798392 (OP)
>Why not bring geocentrism back
Earth is geocentric. It just hasn't a curved surface.
Reality is not about opinions, to believe in curvature is wrong and always will be.

What if I told you that Ptolemy and Copernicus were contemporaries?
And that it was Kepler who asked Scaligeri to thrown Ptolemy into the new fabricated antiquity? In this way, Ptolemy ideas would be regarded as obsolete, and Copernicus avantgarde.
The geocentric model was extensively used in medieval alchemy and astronomy, and yes, the Earth must be round for it to work.

>>40798441
>All the kids that did draw smiling sun since forever back then were having visions of the endtimes
Dood, watnow

because geocentricism is too based, there actually are deep spiritual powers in that model (even if it may be materially untrue). schizos wouldn't be schizos if they had actually intelligent whacky beliefs.

>>40800408
Probably all the prophets and shamans of the old cultures were just too dumb to get it...

what if it's depending on which rock/rot/dirt/earth you sit on?

>>40800475
>old cultures as told by modern historiography
>trust it, bro

>>40798392 (OP)
Cause my space contacts dont like that

They already feel alienated.

>>40798946
LOA anons btfo

>>40798392 (OP)
Watch this
https://youtu.be/PolFadm-lgU?si=xbPAirWBqol5h1Ma