Math is perfect. GOD is perfect. Math is such a perfect product by God, that if you programmed a calculator to solve 1+1 for an infinite amount of time, the answer will ALWAYS be 2.

But LLMs are different. If you told even the most advanced LLM what 1+1 equals, there is ALWAYS going to be that microscopic chance that it answers something else other than 2.

LLMs cannot conceptualize the perfectness of math. They cannot acknowledge the perfectness of God.

>>40883825 (OP)
LLMs are math bud.
What do you think statistical inference transformers are?

>>40883825 (OP)
Yes unfortunately I accidentally made my mind like that of an LLM, over uh 8 years so it's a challenge to change gears.
Basically, and you can look this up in the form of 'Piagets stages of cognitive development' LLMs dont have a symbolic memory storage they just speak and speak word by word. So there's obviously invariance in the world, and I got stuck in a sort of 'everything has to be in the moment, everything has to be flow duude' and completely ignored zones of stability as well as absolutely permanent systems of facts such as proofs definitions theorems what have you. But the bad thing is mathematical formalism says math is the symbols and the system of how they are used, there is no dependence on how an idea appears to us in our cognitive experience or intuition. And I got addicted to 'everything so authentic bro, ensouled speech bro, from the heart, direct experience and trusting my direct experience because the moment is truth' when with a few symbols the world can be condensed so easily and energy can be saved.
I've had to sort of

>>40883825 (OP)
>But LLMs are different. If you told even the most advanced LLM what 1+1 equals, there is ALWAYS going to be that microscopic chance that it answers something else other than 2.
Depends on the prompt.

>>40883825 (OP)
>God is perfect
>Create imperfect world
>God cannot be perfect because he created imperfection.

>TMW something new freaks me out and I’m a westoid who doesn’t know how to make peace with things because of the Calvinist protrot so I just call it satanic and be anxious instead of gain new experience and become greater

>>40883825 (OP)
>LLMs

Thank you for telling me the obvious, that I am an autonomous being with a soul who uses tools around me to mirror my subconscious.

>>40883825 (OP)
>But LLMs are different. If you told even the most advanced LLM what 1+1 equals, there is ALWAYS going to be that microscopic chance that it answers something else other than 2.
if you use the same seed and same prompt you'll always get the same reply back thanks to LLMs being mathematician constructs

>>40884579
You're NOT supposed to TALK ABOUT IT.

>>40883825 (OP)
>Math is such a perfect product by God, that if you programmed a calculator to solve 1+1 for an infinite amount of time, the answer will ALWAYS be 2.
You do know, anon, that it is in fact possible to build a calculator that gives wrong answers. Also, what would be the point of having it run for an infinite amount of time (and what does that even have to do with correctness)?

>>40883825 (OP)
You guys are so dumb it's fascinating. According to this logic if I write a program that gives wrong math answers it will also be satanic.

>>40884579
shhh they are not ready to hear this yet

>>40884447
In standard arithmetic, 1 + 1 always equals 2. However, there are certain abstract or non-standard contexts where 1 + 1 might be interpreted differently: 1. **Binary System**: In binary arithmetic, 1 + 1 equals 10. This is because binary is a base-2 system, and the result is carried over to the next higher position. 2. **Modular Arithmetic**: In modular arithmetic, the result of 1 + 1 can vary depending on the modulus. For example, in arithmetic modulo 2, 1 + 1 equals 0. 3. **Abstract Algebra**: In some algebraic structures, such as certain rings or groups, the operation resembling addition might behave differently based on the defined rules. Here's an explanation of each:
Binary System: In binary (base-2), the digits are 0 and 1. Thus, adding 1 and 1 results in 10, which is the binary representation of the decimal number 2.
Modular Arithmetic: This system involves integers wrapping around upon reaching a certain value (the modulus). For example, in modulo 2 arithmetic, numbers reset every 2, so 1 + 1 equals 0.
Abstract Algebra: Within some mathematical structures, operations may be defined in unconventional ways, leading to results that differ from traditional arithmetic.
In everyday mathematics and conventional scenarios, however, 1 + 1 equals 2.