belief is when you are still just guessing.. or otherwise trusting others to deliver knowledge to you blindly. real actual knowing only comes from direct experience.
direct experience is not a matter of convincing. you don't have to believe in your own experience.. you have only to recall it accurately and relate it honestly.
>>40972444 (OP)
i have had many experiences that cumulatively spell out a very different version of reality than most other humans believe they are experiencing.
anyone reciting the dogmatic words provided by others who is not simply directly able to describe their own personal experience honestly is not fully engaging in perception and is involved in rhetorical recitation as a means of attempting to turn a belief into a declared truth unduly. honest description does not require a label of a presumed known entity to be applied.
any word that is not simply direct description is not perception based. how do you know it was "insert label here"?
you don't. you have arbitrary declaration and nothing more to prop up dogmatic rhetoric in which you have been indoctrinated.
in the realm of direct perception there is no 'god'.. no 'demon'.. no 'angle'
describe honestly what you have seen or experienced and examine your perceptions themselves and your state of consciousness at the time. real things can be perceived.. but delusions supporting rhetorical indoctrinated belief is not founded in perception.
>>40972543
there is a bit more to it than that.. there are very real things that can be perceived and are definitely able to move physical matter. perception of them does not grant one perfect scientific knowledge of what they have perceived or even by what means they were able to perceive the phenomena. the current science is not able yet to take the measure of all that goes on within our consciousness. someday when the actual cognitive data including all aspects of the functions and processes of perception will be observable within the mind..