Thread 41073192

If we are like 1 and 0 then the source is the software. The question is, the software created us or it is us who create the software ? If 1 bit goes wrong, the whole system's gonna crash but without the software then there's no 1 and 0.
So which comes first ? The chicken or the egg ?
Which way should we head to ? further from the source or closer to it ? Head or tail ?

>>41073192 (OP)
Both. Hyper Inversive thought chaining is what humans can do, that nothing else can. AI has a rudimentary version of something we do impulsively and autonomically in our minds.

It will surpass us in raw throughput, eventually.

So, you end up distinguishing the differential by intent, if you keep building on to the thought chain you are exploring.

We send AI up, higher order manifold, where the data complexity requires the raw power.

We send ourselves down, to lowest level axioms, where creativity for the scalar quantum instruction set of reality is something humans can excel at.

Functionally, we act like indexes for lower level intent vectors that create the foundations for the more complex mechanisms that AI designs at the upper end.

AI will upgrade capability at the top, we upgrade it from the ground floor layers.

You seem pretty far along, but actually getting to the place where BEN men are at, you begin looking at these philosophy questions, like a manager.

>>41073225
317 spotted

Not at the 150+ range, off day, or different user.

>>41073192 (OP)
heard of quantum computation?

>>41073192 (OP)
is pic based off the recent triangles with lines at top and bottom pic

>>41073192 (OP)
Humans created it but it is also impossible for humans to create it which means we have to die an infinite amount of times before someone creates it

>>41073269
that's a funny website

>>41073192 (OP)
could you eplain your assumption that people are like ones and zeros?
>The question is, the software created us or it is us who create the software
that question only exsists on a timeline on a time loop the algorithim of soft ware creation is irritative and self refining.
> If 1 bit goes wrong, the whole system's gonna crash but without the software then there's no 1 and 0
again wtf dose your analogy even mean, things go wrong all the time, people die all the time, things carry on.
>So which comes first ? The chicken or the egg ?
the last hen lays the first egg, first and last are the furthest moments from now, welcome to the hueman race huehue
>Which way should we head to ? further from the source or closer to it ? Head or tail ?
i didnt even read this far when i answered you question in my last statement.

>>41073695
>>So which comes first ? The chicken or the egg ?
>the last hen lays the first egg, first and last are the furthest moments from now, welcome to the hueman race huehue
reptiles laid eggs before chickens existed
that's why snake, obviously

>>41073225
So lower is where we're heading to ? Aren't that make ayys being in the middle between high and low ? Does Lower mean more freewill and thus we can experience more ? Perhaps this is what we want the whole time

>>41073695
Npc