← Home ← Back to /x/

Thread 41467784

6 posts 4 images /x/
Anonymous No.41467784 [Report] >>41467857 >>41468773
My current understanding of spiritual beings.
Dude, honestly, I believe there exists a Logos — a creator of the universe, as the theist philosophers say.

That creator being made the universe.
But—

The Demiurge is merely the manifestation of Lucifer, or the negative pole of reality.
Jesus or Allah are the positive pole of reality, and they stand at the summit of creation — in a way, they are manifestations and children of the creative Logos.
Similar to how in Hinduism there is a creator god from whom other gods are born.
Jesus and Allah are children of the Logos.

But then—
There exist divine beings who, in pagan, Amerindian, and Shinto religions, would be like Amaterasu, or Zeus, or Ganesha.
Pachamama belongs to this category of beings.
These would correspond, in Christianity, to the archangels, or to the sephiroth in Kabbalah.
They would act as planetary managers of different forces.
For example, these would scientifically correspond to forces of nature, and astrologically to entities such as the planets, the Moon, and the Sun.

Below them are more local beings — like nymphs, kami, or guardian angels — whose role is more like being the anima or spirit of nature, or in some way, the guardian angels of a forest or an animal.

Below those would be the more primitive spiritual beings, such as goblins or pixies.

Finally, the Demiurge would also have a similar hierarchy.

At the top of his ranks would be the great generals of the Demiurge — the great demons like the Asuras or Mammon — who would bring about natural disasters.

Below them would be the fallen angels — the oni, ogres, demons, ghouls, vampires, lesser demons, archons.
Their function would be to cause temptation in humans, so that humans generate karma and suffering, which would serve as a kind of spiritual nourishment for those beings.
Anonymous No.41467857 [Report]
>>41467784 (OP)
I didn’t read your thread. You seem like a massive faggot.
Anonymous No.41468773 [Report] >>41468812
>>41467784 (OP)
I cringe at the question "do you believe in god?"
as you say, there is a "creator" of a sort, whatever superintelligence created this construct. But that "entity", if that's even the right term, probably does not ever directly interact with the Construct. What we interact with are the broad and wide expanse of layers, tiers of beings in between that "creator" and us. It's amazing how advanced many humans 'think' they are - when most are barely even a few steps on the journey up the mountain. We don't get to talk to The Creator, we are to it as less than we see ants
Anonymous No.41468812 [Report] >>41470564
>>41468773
pretty sure the creator is more like the chinese concept of the Dao rather than an antropological human character.
Anonymous No.41469953 [Report]
^_^
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FnIxXbId9CA
Anonymous No.41470564 [Report]
>>41468812
Good thread anon. Not much to add atm but I think you might have some mistakes i am not adept enough to correct.