>>279690903
>They stagnate discussion in the same way generals do and enforce a singularity of opinion.
I'm not sure but it seems so. Though this could happen because samefagging faggots, but also because one opinion managed to convinced everyone. I really only have the Kengan threads as example so I can believe you on this.
>Generally a bad one as well, seeing as dailies are pay to play. (Pass removes captchas which enables scripted dumping and halves time required to do it) People say be the change you want to see, but dailies subvert that concept and turn board culture into a heavily curated in-group of a few people willing to bump a thread 20 hours a day, and from this we get people that don't even know how to read manga off site.
Didn't know this. Fair point.
>So I can't just make a thread and talk about why a manga is good. Not only will its visibility be obscured behind literally 25 dailies, but also people do not read anything outside of dailies
On this I disagree. What turned me off making threads to discuss specific manga is that waifufaggots and yuritroons will make ten threads an hour and send my thread to the archive before I've even had the time to reply to the two anons who answered. Look at the catalog right now, are there ten "Daily X thread"? No.
>which are generally fairly bad in their manga choices and level of discussion.
I think that heavily depends of the choice of manga. Some were cool like Harukanaru or Teppu, some should've been punished with permaban+doxx+beatings like T*riko.
>It's encouraging poor engagement and parasocial behavior. It's just better to go discuss manga on manga sites at this point, like there's no difference between a daily and comment page on a manga aggregator, except users here are less knowledgable and samefag more.
Honestly not in all cases. But I can imagine it being better than /a/. Hell last good thread about Wangan Midnight was on /o/.