Thread 279913509

What are your hopes for the upcoming season 2 of Ranma 1/2's censored remake now that it is confirmed they're skipping a good chunk of the manga's stories?

Skipping the boring shit is good. The mango was way too long. Censorship however is wrong, and I want to see cartoon nipples.

>>279913509 (OP)
Sex with female Ranma

>>279913737
Based

>>279913509 (OP)
>What are your hopes for the upcoming season 2 of Ranma 1/2's censored remake?
None
o
n
e

>censored remake
>you faggots STILL want to watch it
Enjoy being battered wives.

>>279913509 (OP)
>>279913737
>>279914808
samefaggot

>>279913737
It is "Female Ranma sexo"

>>279913509 (OP)
Old series skipped a good chunk of the manga stories as well, and had a fair bit of censorship too.
Glad they're finally properly adapting the War of the Melons.

>>279917481
You can't claim it is closer to the manga when you skip a whole bunch, anon
That one you posted wasn't censorship either, only a change of setting since they added more nudity on the same arc, like 2 anime original bath scenes and they also changed some chapters like the one where Ranma and Akane have a giant ping pong match so they would be wearing one pieces instead of yukatas like in the manga, other example would be the magic soap chapter where Ranma remains naked and we get an anime original nipples and ass shot instead of dressing up right after the soap doesn't work like in the manga, try better next time

>>279917635
Based

>>279915757
If I was samefagging, that post would've defended the tripe remake.

>>279913509 (OP)
They better remove all censorship, and put the nipples back in.

>>279913509 (OP)
>>279917635
If it ends up being only 48 episodes long like the Urusei Yatsura remake they won't even be able to adapt half of the manga, assuming the last season is only used to cover the final arc it would still be rushed as fuck

>>279917635
>>279917742
>>279917767
The trailer already confirmed they're skipping some of the Happosai chapters, I was wondering on how they were planning to adapt the bath house chapter for the remake due to it being heavily censored but they're just skipping it, they're also skipping the tea ceremony chapters but those seem to be hated on this board (I thought they were fine)

>>279917635
The old series skipped a bunch of stories too.
The new series has modern Japanese content rules to worry about.
What excuse did they have back then?

Ukyo /ss/

>>279917767
UY 2022 only adapted a third of UY, and Ranma is about 60 chapters longer. No way they'd be able to rush it in 46 episodes, not after taking two seasons to get to volume 10. UY 2022 was animating stuff past volume 20 in its second cour.

>>279918127
It was animated by Deen, back in the 90s they created many anime original stories that were not in the manga, they did it in Kenshin and You're Under Arrest as well, for example the 90s Kenshin anime has 95 episodes and only 43 adapt the manga and do so very loosely
it never bothered me in Ranma since we got more nudity thanks to the anime original episodes and I also thought Nabiki was more likeable in the anime as well
the TV thing isn't a good reason to censor the show when it is is streaming exclusive even in Japan, they could just release it uncensored in BD, but MAPPA doesn't allow nipples in any show

>>279918291
Every 2024 Ranma cour is 12 episodes long, they're already skipping stuff and they're apparently only getting 4 cours, we don't know just how for ahead they plan on skipping but it ain't looking good unless they get a extra cour

>>279918409
>they're apparently only getting 4 cours
Seems to be just speculation based on the furthest out story they've hinted at animating so far. Although even with them starting to skip stuff, that could be 5th or 6th cour.

>remake a show to be closer to the manga
>skip a bunch of the mangas content
I'd ask what the point of these remakes even are, but I know it's just nostalgic cash grab.

>>279918324
>they created many anime original stories that were not in the manga
Yeah, and they animated so much original garbage about the elders of the Tea Ceremony and other Anime-original characters, they somehow never animated famous early manga stories.
Even the OAVs wasted episodes on filler stories instead of animating the stuff fans wanted.

>>279918608
Mappa doesn't usually do that many cours, they even dropped Teekyu after season 3 and other studio did the rest instead
>>279918683
The OVA filler characters were designed by Rumiko tho

>>279918127
Back in the day, they had 26 episode seasons and would need to fill time with filler. There's also some things to consider when it comes to adapting a work like 1) some things in animated form don't work as well as a still medium like manga 2) some arcs might have had a negative fan reception in the original manga and so they respond to fan feedback by not animating it 3) sometimes as a show is airing, anime original characters or arcs get more popular so they start to lean into those, etc.

All of this said, there's obviously examples when it's just producers or creatives not liking something and just ignoring it. See Urusei Yatsura and Sailor Moon for big examples. But other times, the anime original decisions prove to work well. It's a crap shoot.

But the modern Ranma remake doesn't have this excuse. It has both the original manga and the first run anime to reference, as well as the fan reaction to both. And it skips some fan favorite parts from both. And if modern censors won't allow Ranma to be fully adapted, then they shouldn't have done a reboot to begin with.

Just watch the original at this point desu

>>279918755
>other studio did the rest instead
Honestly it wouldn't bother me if the later manga got animated by a studio other than MAPPA. They never should have gotten the deal in the first place if they couldn't deliver 23 episodes a year.

>>279918802
Anon, it is some of the most popular and sexier stories that the old series never animated. Like they were holding out to get more money from the fans. They were stories that were already published when the final OAVs anime were made too. They actually spent a bunch of episodes on stories a lot of the fans hate.

Ranma is pretty tame by modern Japanese standards, the only real content they can't put on Japanese TV is the nipples.

The only type of people that defends this pile of garbage is netflix shills and some fags that only found out about ranma because of netflix adaptations and like to defend it because "muh ok boomer, muh new stuff better".
Their excuse to defend the censorship on s1 was already bad, now for this season to defend the censorship AND they cutting stuff is even worse.You can see on this very thread that they have no way to defend it.

Is the new series actually entertaining or are people mad because there isn't as much nudity? Always wanted to watch Ranma

>>279920728
It is good and entertaining so far. Only real problem is MAPPA is taking forever to adapt it. Honestly they should have just skipped the whole early part of the story and jumped straight to the good stuff the old series censored.
English language fans went a long time only having fan manga translations of the best Ranma stories.

>>279920959

Yeah from what I understand the series is ridiculously long. Im glad you said this I'm watching the new one sometime

new season was reallu bad, i returned to watch my VHS tapes then watch the shitflix abomination.

>>279913509 (OP)
Made for Kuno's big kendo sword.

>>279921031
It really isn't. Only just over 400 chapters. Takahashi basically just makes new series instead of arcs.

No nipples, no hopes

>>279913509 (OP)
That they don't retcon Tsubasa into being a tranny, or just leave him out completely

>>279918755
Natsume's armpits

>>279924018
probably will be left out, due to how tsubasa is.
>i'm a normal man!! not a pervert like you (towards ranma).
>i only like women, i disguise as girl because ukyo disguises as man!!.
>towards ranma : again behaving like a cheap okama?

>>279918809
I’m sad, I’ve been going at a rate of ~1 episode per night since early this year and only have 5 episodes and the OVAs left. It’s been way more entertaining than I thought it would be.

>>279924768
When I marathoned the original Ranma over the course of several months a while back it boomered me out so fucking hard on so much modern anime, and I didn't want it to at all.

>>279924768
Nothing wrong with the arcs the OG series animated, they still hold up. There is just a lot the old series didn't animate.

>>279913509 (OP)
I only hope they simply stop censoring.

>>279913509 (OP)
>now that it is confirmed they're skipping a good chunk of the manga's stories?
Wait, sauce?

Also does this mean it’s guaranteed that the Happosai focused chapters will be getting skipped?

>>279913509 (OP)
I still remember all the "YOU'RE JUST SHITTING ON IT WITHOUT WAITING FOR THE BLURAY" spam from the shill retards, just like they did with UruYatsu. And of course, now they're nowhere to be seen after the BDs dropped and it's still censored westernized slop.
>>279914808
Also this. The reason we keep getting censored adaptations is because faggot retards can't stop themselves from consooming. Especially remakes/reboots/whatever the fuck they want to be called.
What compels one to eat up any and all putrid shit, so long as it shares the name of something they enjoyed in the past? A lack of other hobbies? Obviously not having any standards, for one.

>>279913509 (OP)
>OMG THE OLD SEASON IS BAD
>why?
>THE FILLER
>watch the filler
>the filler is god tier
I will not believe Anonymous anymore, hate that guy.

>>279925886
>I only hope they simply stop censoring.
Why would you even hope for something that's not going to happen? This and Urusei Yatsura were funded and platformed by westerners, it's obviously going to stay censored as a result.

>>279924018
>That they don't retcon Tsubasa into being a tranny
They’re already retconning Ranma himself into one, he seems much less desperate for a cure than he was during the original…

>>279925963
People are really over-reacting to not having scenes of absolutely every chapter in the trailer.

>>279925963
Happosai is in the trailer. It's stuff like the tea ceremonies arc that wasn't there (and also no cast announcement).

>>279917907
>>279927189
>>279918324

>>279926915
That arc was really dull anyways, a bit like the real thing

>>279926915
>Happosai confirmed
Well, gonna stop watching it then...

>>279913509 (OP)
extremely condensed, they are adapting massive chapters just like with the urusei yatsura. Also the animation looks worse, especially the juliet frame

>>279920959
The last parts of the manga are considered the worst part by everyone. Including the animation studios since they never even bothered making an ova for them.

>>279924018
they skipped him but not happosai, guess happosai is impossible to skip

>>279918755
>>The OVA filler characters were designed by Rumiko tho
Source?

>>279926887
huh, the season in 12 episode,in the trailer they went over, mousse, cologne, ukyo, mousse return, happosai, happosai dressing up as pchan to sleep with akane, the juliet arc. Yeah pretty safe to assume it's super condensed.

>>279928672
>s-sauce?!
look it up faggot

>>279918782
Cute

>>279913509 (OP)
They definitely aren't going to put Shampoos outrageously racist chinese accent in the new english dub.

>>279928592
its fine zoomers like shit super condensed, everything not straight plot is filler to them

>>279927685
Happosai would have worked in small doses.

>>279927685
I see a lot of people dislike Happosai, I can get why but I always loved him. Rumiko did too, I think. Maybe the original anime made him worse with filler.

how are the retards from twitter going to concile that rumiko likes happosai and uses him for humor?

>>279928834
yup rumiko cited she liked happosai in her interview, also no the original anime pretty much portrayed him just like he is in the manga.

>>279913592
>>279927189
why does this little slut have eyeshadow
no way the girl fell in with makeup

>>279928834
>>279928862
Yeah, the anime didn't have him OoC, just had more of him in filler stories, so if you didn't care for him, you'd also dislike them.

>>279923988
Based

>>279928834
The anime did make it worse by focusing even more on him. But there's way too much of him in the manga as well. In the middle and later parts of the manga, it's like every other chapter is about him. And he's always the same running gag. So even if he was an okay character like Ryoga, it would get old. Imagine if every other chapter was Ryoga getting lost. Okay we get it...do something new.

>>279920728
It's the definition of sanitized. If you always wanted to watch ranma you would go watch the original instead of relying on this farce. You didn't actually want to watch ranma, you just want to say you did, and something with so few episodes is a convenient excuse to do so.

>>279928888
Takahashi has characters with default eyeshadow to indicate they are extremely beautiful

>>279928822
She cute
>>279928834
I liked Happosai a lot as well, he seems pretty popular on my region too at least, his hatedom seems to mainly come from American fans, no idea why

>>279929291
I've seen hate on him from latam fandom, just like most annoying complaints

>>279928862
>rumiko cited she liked happosai in her interview
Not surprising, absolutely irredeemably evil characters are really fun to write in comedy.

>the original anime pretty much portrayed him just like he is in the manga.
LOL no. The filler crap was always trying to make him likeable. The absolute opposite of what it should have done, and it is part of why the filler flops.

>>279929236
>>279929291

>>279929291
>>279929340
The west just hates openly pervy guys while crushing on actually rapey men in shoujo. Same ol' story. If Happ' was a 6+ foot young dude with long ass fingers and his actions weren't played off as gags they'd be all over him.

>>279929629
No. There are tons of pervy guys the west likes. The problem was explained up at >>279928979

Happosai was just used too much. That said, some people (especially female viewers) in the west still like him.

>>279929291
I think with some American fans it's almost virtue signaling, especially among female fans. Like "I can't enjoy a perverted old man that hits on teenagers in any possible way whatsoever or that means people will think I condone his behavior!" etc.

I'm American and think Happosai's pretty funny though. Like yeah he's gross but it's obvious that's the joke and that the characters all hate him. I do think maybe he got overused in possibly both the anime and manga, which can make you kind of tired of him, but in that case the annoyance is more than Ranma has such a big, fun side cast that it's disappointing to see stories about the same dude all the time.

>>279928702
All I saw was this. No interview.

>>279913509 (OP)
My wife

>>279929782
The pervy guys the west "likes" are all harem protags, often with canonically implied huge dicks, who bend over backwards to please all the women like Issei. Bonus points for that since it's an over the top ecchi, so normalfaggot ironic weebs will cry out "it's trash that knows it, lol! I love it!!!1!!"
It's not really a fair comparison at all.

I'm not a fan of Ranma's remake rubbing my face in how bad arts gotten over the years.
Anime's lost a lot of its traditional weaknesses in animation over time but it's come at the expense of traditional strength in art.

>>279929782
>>279929629
he is right, ataru has the same humor happosai has but young and he is still hated for that.

>>279930038
There's plenty of other examples, from Lupin to Brock to whatever. And like I said, a lot of women also like Happosai. You're just being selective because you have this idea in your head, probably because your friends were like that. My female friends loved the openly perverted guys in shounen or shoujo. And they liked Happosai. But they got tired of him being overused in the second half of the anime when they wanted more Ryoga shipping. Hence why I said the issue isn't that he's pervy but that he's overused.

>>279929629
This, just make the pervert handsome. It's ugly goblin dudes like Happosai and Mineta that get hate

>>279913592
i'd argue that nipple-less areolas are just as censored

>>279930094
>Ataru
Holy shit bro, come on.
>>279930121
>no your reasoning is shit, meanwhile my anecdote isn't
What in the bad faith retardation even is this post? Try again bud.

>>279930240
>no your reasoning is shit, meanwhile my anecdote isn't
Not what I said. I even tried to meet you in the middle ground saying it's probably both our own experiences producing a different view. But clearly you just want to work with generalizations, then deflect ad hominem when it isn't agreed with. So there isn't anything left to talk about.

>>279930328
No, you're playing it off like you tried to make a concession in this post but your last post was entirely a handwave with "muh experience muh female friends". Again, what in the bad faith fuckery are you on right now?
You probably got embarrassed being called out for this shit is all.

>>279930404
> but your last post was entirely a handwave with "muh experience muh female friends".
I brought up the theory that maybe your view is bias to your experiences. Which you didn't counter. Either you didn't read it or my theory was correct and now you're using ad hominem to deflect away from it, as I said in my last post.
>You probably got embarrassed being called out for this shit is all.
And this sounds like projection, making my theory even more likely...

>>279930691
I did counter it by saying your entire post is bad faith retardation, which you really didn't like. Calling out fallacies isn't "ad hominem" either, learn what words mean before you mindlessly rattle them off.
Again, babbling about your personal experiences and handwaving those of someone else isn't "meeting someone in the middle", and trying to spin it that way isn't surprising considering how dishonest you've were when you thought it was even a good idea to post that shlock.
>projection
Read that second to last sentence above once more.

>>279930140
the mc of city hunter is also a perv but he is liked

>>279913579

You're not white.

>>279930892
>Calling out fallacies isn't "ad hominem" either
Saying someone is retarded and claiming they're arguing in bad faith while you're doing that very thing, is.
>Again, babbling about your personal experiences and handwaving those of someone else
I didn't handwave your experiences. What I did do was say your views are generalizations and theorized it came from your experiences. Which you never confirmed or denied and still continue to avoid it by attacking me.
>Read that second to last sentence above once more.
You better read my post again just in case as well.

Multiple people have pointed out examples to you of pervy characters who are liked in the west. Instead of acknowledging it, you ignore or attack them. This is textbook deflection. You could always prove otherwise with a good argument. But all you do is ad hominem and defensive deflection. Which just further makes it look like projection.

>>279931398
>Saying someone is retarded
Not in this context.
>and claiming they're arguing in bad faith while you're doing that very thing, is.
Calling out fallacious reasoning is not """""ad hominem.""""" You're being even more disingenuous here by implying it is. Why does someone so intent on skewing the truth care about some perceived slights in a discussion?
>more mental illness and revisionism
Don't know how "no you're wrong and just being selective" can be interpreted as anything else but an outright dismissal.
>multiple
God damn Ataru was the only one, please. And all this is complete hearsay, meanwhile I'm going off of what's actually selling in female focused media like picrel here >>279930892
You know, something that's actually happening in the real world. Anything else? I thought you said you were done here an hour ago too. What next, rapey/abusive shoujo MCs don't exist because of another anecdote on your end?

>>279931479
>God damn Ataru was the only one, please.
>Lupin
>Brock
>Onizuka
Not even going to bother responding to all the rest of your stuff when you flat out admit to not reading or selectively avoiding examples.

My only dream at this point is to see Sasuke appear in the remake, I don't even need to have him be a speaking character, have him be a background character in a Kuno episode and I'll be happy.
I'm already bummed they're skipping chapters, if they were going to do that they might as well have skipped some stuff in the first season that the OG anime had already done better.

>>279931910
>if they were going to do that they might as well have skipped some stuff in the first season that the OG anime had already done better.
Yeah, I feel like they should have just done the chapters the old anime didn't. The problem is, the executives were obviously doing this just for the nostalgia cash. So the whole point is remaking the stuff the old anime did do.

>>279913509 (OP)
Ranma didn't need a remake.
Are there really any other unadapted manga left?

>>279931676
It's just simply retarded and dishonest, ignores what I even said in the first place about them all being younger, like I said, not even mentioning that they have more fleshed out characters which is why people like them in the first place, and not for being pervs. Brock/Takeshi is also played as a hopeless romantic too, not a perv. Definitely not even remotely on par with Happousai, so yet another disingenuous post. Can't even imagine comparing these characters to the rapey/abusive MCs that litter shoujo trash either that I brought up. And again, it's not like any of them are beloved for being pervs (and not even in Brock/Takeshi's case), but for other parts of their character that's actually like 99% of their screentime. You literally just proved me right.
Anything else?

>>279932370
there is mao but i bet after ranma they will go straight to maison ikkoku, then inuyasha.

>>279932399
i meant manga in general, not only takahashi's
can't believe anime is becoming vidya this hard. held hostage by tourists, pozzed into oblivion and now, releasing needless remakes

>>279931910
As a fan of the old anime (I like the manga too, for some reason there's a certain breed of nu!Ranma fans who seem to believe that if you like one you hate the other), I kind of like the idea of the new series skipping certain arcs because that means that nu!Ranma anime-onlies may now actually have an incentive to watch the old series to see those arcs animated.

>>279932445
It's not fans or "tourists." It's shareholders and producers who don't want any risks. Hollywood has had this problem for 20 years. Anime is just starting to fall into the remake/reboot trap. In large part because of funding from those same companies funding Hollywood.

>>279932475
shareholders are making decisions and avoiding risks with loud twitter tourists in mind.
when they oblige, the twitter mob enters into a lull.
just like with vidya, hopefully the anime industry will crash at some point.
thing is, with vidya you have a solid metric: sales. anime doesn't have something like that. dvds don't really sell well in the west. CR subs is probably their best metric, and apparently, they haven't panicked yet.

>>279913737
Sex with male Ranma AND Ryoga

>>279920728
It's not terrible, but there's very little reason to watch it over the original.

>>279932553
>shareholders are making decisions and avoiding risks with loud twitter tourists in mind.
It's more the hedge funds and consultants. After 15+ years, they've seen that even the Twitter people don't watch their crap. But they keep doing it because the money they get from Blackrock and co is more than they would have gotten from sales.

At least it was until last year when the whole scheme fell apart.
>thing is, with vidya you have a solid metric: sales. anime doesn't have something like that.
They have purposefully killed physical media to go all in on streaming and other things they can control. You'll own nothing and like it, etc. But it failed. Streaming is dying, people just get what they want free online, the hedge fund money is drying up and now they've killed movie theaters and physical media. The crash might actually come this time. And they have themselves to blame.

But it's mostly going to be Hollywood crashing. The anime and video game industries have a lot more back up plans and parachutes. Sony and SquareEnix (Crunchyroll and so on) will probably see a huge crash. But then 90% of the other companies never took the Blackrock money. And people will just flock to those. They already are.

>>279932385
>Brock/Takeshi is also played as a hopeless romantic too, not a perv.
The main difference is Brock only hit on adult women, whereas Happosai gropes, molests, and steals the underwear of mainly minors.

>>279932781
I like how you think

>>279913509 (OP)
>skipping a good chunk of the manga’s stories
Hopefully this’ll mean less Akane and Akane shilling all around, the less of her the better.