>>279942496
>shadman
Agree with the sentiment, but the reason Japanese lolicon is good and shadman sucked is that shadman is performative and is out to offend deliberately and is interested in gross out stuff (besides fart fetishes, his drawings always look sweaty and ugly), whereas you can tell Japanese lolicons actually love little girls genuinely, in a way that only honorary Nihon's like Lewis Caroll were able to do, and their offending westoids is just background radiation. Their love for children is somehow pure and sexual all at the same time, because since their society merely views loliconism as perverse rather than evil, they don't have to perfomatively cloak their desires in some self-aware attitude of "Oh, look at how nasty I'm being!" Even someone like Akihito Tsukishi who seems to love kids to a degree where he even idolizes their more disgusting aspects, seems to see the beauty in this, and doesn't merely fetishize it *because* it's disgusting. I might disagree with his sense of beauty, but at least there's an internally consistent ethos there. Thus concludes my thesis.
