>>280333439
The schizo rant shall continue.
Let’s talk about shota.
No, not the soft pastel stuff. I mean the stuff that gets patted on the head and called “subversive” and “sensitive portrayals of masculinity” while lolicon gets dragged through glass and called criminal degeneracy.
What the fuck is this double standard?
You think the same people who scream “drawn lolis are literal abuse” suddenly turn into Derrida-tier philosophers when the 12-year-old boy is the object? Suddenly it’s about trauma, queer identity, gender inversion, emotional vulnerability, ““nuance””. Shut the fuck up.
When a guy likes 2D girls:
>“You’re a disgusting manchild clinging to a control fantasy”
When a woman draws a shota getting railed by a 7-foot oni with bedroom eyes:
>“It’s just exploring power dynamics and healing from repressive gender norms uwu”
They’ll analyze shota like it’s fucking Dostoevsky while lolicon is declared a war crime. How the hell does this happen? Because (say it with me now) female consumption is protected, and male desire is criminalized.
You could slap a shota into a depressing WW2 bunker getting lovingly groomed by a Nazi and someone on Twitter will write a 40-tweet thread on why it’s “healing.” Meanwhile a lolicon artist draws a girl eating cake and everyone’s calling Interpol.
Fucking hypocrites. If you’re gonna burn loli to the ground, fine. But don’t pretend the shota fandom is a bunch of pure-hearted trauma-processing cherubs. They’re just as into it, arguably worse because they’re constantly justifying it behind layers of academia and gender theory.
At least lolicons admit they’re sick in the head.
