>>280362989>I never said that shit adheres to a formula.I was saying you in the general sense.
>he was actually not completely far off in pointing out Dandadan arcs have been a little routine.That's a different argument, but regardless it does not adhere to the formula he laid out.
>So you're saying that the typical formula of a romcom supersedes the basic formula that anon outlined above?It's a romance. If you're complaining about the romance not being culminated right away, you might as well complain that an action movie doesn't have the good guys defeat the bad guys in act 1. Some things go beyond formula and are the basic structures of the story.