Why People Are Too Stupid For Stone Ocean - /a/ (#280558209) [Archived: 295 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:00:38 PM No.280558209
b4e6a07c4a8d1435f4bfc33ad38ef2624dfe70a4eadd1373900079d38e6532bc
In the manga industry, mainstream publications are usually split by target demographic: shonen for boys/young men, shojo for girls/young women (think Sailor Moon, Rose of Versailles, etc), seinen for young men, and josei for young women are the main four, with shonen being THE thing people think of when they hear the word "manga". Before SBR, Jojo was published in Shueisha's Weekly Shonen Jump, alongside such titans as One Piece, Dragon Ball, and Naruto. And until SO, Jojo pretty well fit in with the shonen demographic, bizarre though it is. Fundamentally, it comes down to cool guys punching each other in cool ways, which shonen readers are absolutely down with.
But then SO comes along. Imagine Araki going to his editors at WSJ and saying "yes, this next part will be centered around a nineteen-year-old American woman in prison". It's a stark contrast to the historically-focused Jonathan or Joseph, or the Japanese cool guys Jotaro and Josuke. The whole premise is absolutely orthogonal to WSJ's target demographic; looking at SO as a whole, it's clear that Araki was pushing boundaries - for example, making Anasui first appear as a woman (he "wanted to make a character that transcended gender", which ironically FF ended up doing in the anime).
Replies: >>280558340 >>280558486 >>280558627 >>280564477
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:00:50 PM No.280558213
All this is anathema to the famously formulaic shonen genre, where the friendly, big-eater protagonist with a good heart who never gives up defeats enemies with the power of friendship, even from his hot-headed, abusive rival/frenemy, and also there is a Designated Girl there for some reason. There were few other WSJ titles with female protagonists; the only contemporary that comes to mind is Claymore, which only got a few months in WSJ, starting and ending in Shueisha's adjacent, less-renowned monthly publications Monthly Shonen Jump and Jump Square. (These days, there are more titles with female leads, like The Promised Neverland, and, uhh... hm. The Emperor and I, I guess?)
Replies: >>280558340
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:01:37 PM No.280558220
1448441539217_thumb.jpg
1448441539217_thumb.jpg
md5: 89a1f515bbf4e2e468127d83d2e85aaešŸ”
Replies: >>280558288
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:01:51 PM No.280558224
In other words, SO pushed the envelope in many big ways. Interestingly, we already saw Araki start to expand his creativity beyond the shonen genre a little in DiU, and definitely in VA, where he starts to delve deeper into his idea of "fate", and where there are rumors about how Giorno was originally supposed to be a girl. But it's not just feminism - the story itself is complicated, with postmodernist touches that bring the reader's own experience into the story (i.e. the ending) and all the classic Jojo bullshit cranked up to 11 (frogs, snails, rods, "assassination feng shui"...). So it didn't exactly resonate with, say, Dragon Ball's reader base.
Replies: >>280558340
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:02:21 PM No.280558230
I'm glad for you
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:02:52 PM No.280558236
The final thing to remember is that SO ran from 1999-2003. All these themes that we're much more accepting of now - I mostly mean messing with gender roles - were not so unremarkable 20 years ago (at least in America; I can't comment on the gender politics of millennial Japan). It's not ancient history, but times have certainly changed; look at Guilty Gear's Bridget controversy, and ask yourself how that would've gone down in 2000, when virtually no one was coming out in support of trans people. To put Jolyne and Hermes and FF, and their bizarre adventure, in that context - it just didn't resonate with the world at the time.
Replies: >>280558340
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:03:53 PM No.280558251
For SBR and Jojolion (and, presumably, Jojolands), Araki moved to seinen magazine Ultra Jump, where he could be more creative and more adult. Stone Ocean got screwed over in a lot of unfortunate ways, but in my opinion the main thing was the growing pains of Araki's maturing storytelling, which just didn't jive with the typical shonen reader. The fact that Stone Ocean got published and sold at all is a testament to his existing reputation.

So yes, SO is massively underrated, and seems to have a curse on it to that effect. It's subtle and daring and complicated, which people reading Jojo for the fights didn't really go for. But it was not only a foreshadowing of Araki's even more matured storytelling in SBR and Jojolion, it's a magnificent work in its own right, and deserves to be appreciated as such.

(If you want to know even more, you might ask around over at r/manga for more context. I wasn't actually a Jojo fan back then, but I know the western Jojo community was very different pre-Reddit and definitely pre-anime; they had to make do with hilariously bad scanlations, which is a story and a half in itself.)
Replies: >>280558340
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:06:52 PM No.280558288
>>280558220
How come we don't lennyface anymore?
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:08:19 PM No.280558305
>bridget
>trans
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:10:33 PM No.280558340
>>280558209 (OP)
>>280558213
>>280558224
>>280558236
>>280558251
This is copy-pasted from a reddit post.
Replies: >>280558365
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:12:19 PM No.280558365
>>280558340
No it isn't you schizo
Replies: >>280558387 >>280558391
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:14:03 PM No.280558387
1748363796828173
1748363796828173
md5: 597b805eb2e75e25d8cab68523b83fe5šŸ”
>>280558365
https://www.reddit.com/r/StardustCrusaders/comments/x6378p/comment/in7jofv/
Replies: >>280558399
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:14:29 PM No.280558391
>>280558365
>2 seconds in Google
https://www.reddit.com/r/StardustCrusaders/comments/x6378p/comment/in7jofv/
Replies: >>280558399
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:15:16 PM No.280558399
>>280558387
>>280558391
The point still stands
If you have problems with SO you're a sexist that didn't understand it
Replies: >>280558451 >>280563088
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:18:29 PM No.280558438
idk what you're talking about anon, I enjoyed stone ocean

if you're trying to prove something is underrated your first job is to establish how popular it is
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:19:51 PM No.280558451
>>280558399
I think its more simple than that
the teenage boys reading WSJ don't want to catch cooties from a female protagonist
so it didn't do well
Replies: >>280558464
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:21:06 PM No.280558464
>>280558451
Yeah, nothing to do with the poor writing, nonsensical stands, futile ending, horrible art style, no characterisation etc etc, it was HECKIN SEXISM
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:22:52 PM No.280558486
>>280558209 (OP)
Storytime proved it was good. 'nuff said
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:24:52 PM No.280558508
>anime refuses to say her for FF
LMAO
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 12:36:55 PM No.280558627
>>280558209 (OP)
I always thought Stone Ocean was one of the best parts. Especially the last third is absolute kino
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 1:48:29 PM No.280559623
I’m not gonna read all that
Replies: >>280560031
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 2:16:39 PM No.280560031
>>280559623
It's why sexists hated Stone Ocean, it was literally too intelligent for the audience
Replies: >>280563913
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 2:19:43 PM No.280560074
I liked Stone Ocean.
It's not the best part but it wasn't bad at all.
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 2:26:12 PM No.280560176
People really overrate Jojo
It's a decent, dumb shounen, but people think it's a genuinely deep art piece
Replies: >>280561603 >>280566232
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 3:48:01 PM No.280561603
>>280560176
>people think it's a genuinely deep art piece
it is
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 4:50:23 PM No.280563088
>>280558399
>story about girl and her daddy issues
>why don't boys like it... they must be... le sexist...

You can't be this retarded. For the record I liked stone ocean until the ending. She's the most useless protagonist in the series and still needed a man to save her rather than stand on her own merits. If anyone is sexist it's the author.
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 5:19:20 PM No.280563913
>>280560031
Kys troon
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 5:32:11 PM No.280564356
EIGHTY FUCKING NINE YEARS OLD
EIGHTY FUCKING NINE YEARS OLD
md5: dc78619bc80c079d0ba2dded74e6f986šŸ”
How long until the next Jojolands?
Replies: >>280566861 >>280568920
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 5:35:21 PM No.280564477
>>280558209 (OP)
tl;dr also you're retarded for caring this much about what 4chan asshole think about whatever you are talking about
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 6:23:56 PM No.280566232
>>280560176
It got some pretty big features so it's a deep art piece to some degree.
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 6:41:37 PM No.280566861
>>280564356
Just under 2 days from now
Anonymous
7/14/2025, 7:39:52 PM No.280568920
>>280564356
2 days