>>280586023there's no reason to assume free will exists. free will believers such as yourself, feel as though it exists, because you feel as though you're allowed to choose the words you type and you're "free" to close the tab. however every choice you make is based on prior experiences. you encountered talk about free will earlier, so when you see. the next time you're making a choice, you remember our conversation and whichever way you choose, you have internal dialogue e.g. "anon said i don't have free will so i'm going to act spontaneously to prove him wrong" -> your decisionmaking was influenced by prior circumstances, in this case, engaging with me. if you choose, in the same case, to do the predictable thing because i said you would do the unpredictable thing so that i wouldn't "win", you're also influenced by me.
every single choice you make was similarly predetermined by a trillion trillion variable. you got bullied in elementary school so as an adult your "free will" choices tend toward something like e.g. protecting the innocent. every time you make a choice, you feel as though you're making a real choice, but if time was rolled back five minutes and you didn't remember already making the choice, you would make the exact same choice after considering the exact same things you did the first time, the second time, the billionth time, each time the 5 seconds is rolled back.
basically, you're "free" to prove me wrong by quitting your job, starting a drug addiction and becoming homeless. that is to say, the absence of "free will" does not absolve you of morals or consequences, but you would have never at any point made a different choice than the one you made in the past.
there's no reason to believe we have a free will.