>>280741429>the claim is all-knowing, all-powerful, all-lovingI don't usually see the people I'm talking about say "a loving god" specifically, they literally just say pretty much the text in
>>280741412 this image. If more people said that, those comments wouldn't stand out to me as much because at least their logic holds up better
>I don't know why you get emotional at a simple rebuttal like this.I'm not getting emotional really, the take I'm talking about just strikes me as weirdly whiny/self-centered and I've never commented this anywhere until now so yeah, I went into detail to make my point clear. I don't quite get the logic of why bad things wouldn't exist though-- like, yeah, maybe the "all-loving" part if people are focusing on criticizing some specific quote about the Christian God, but that's never what I see mentioned. It's just "no god because bad thing in world"
Like, I don't think there's a god either, but I can see bad things still happening if there was one because I don't see why a god's existence would involve having to constantly reward its creations. Or the god could just be an asshole or something
>We didn't make the absolutist claimI think a lot of people do and that's what I was talking about, the people who absolutely trip over themselves to constantly post smarmy internet atheist comments about some RL human tragedy that the majority of the time had nothing to do with religion at all. If that's not what you were thinking of/talking about re:atheism, then I wasn't referring to you, and I most likely agree with atheists who use different/better arguments than that. I don't really have much more to say on this subject but hopefully my point's a little clearer.