>>280803918Your argument would only hold water if looks can't be exceptional in and of themselves, so one would have to find other aspects exceptional instead.
That's obviously not true. If the capacity for distinction exists objectively then the capacity for subjective taste to highly value certain distinct "looks" follows. And so one could find "looks" "special".
Because we have demonstrated that "looks" can be "special" your exclusion of them is arbitrary.
QED I want to wear Rikka's thighs as earmuffs