>>280885113
I know being sincere in this thread is like throwing pearls at swine but I'll bite.
what part made you laugh? the only time I even smiled was when the hot noodles got spilled into that old guy's bag, the rest of the humor is just le random + exaggerated reactions. don't get me wrong, nichijou had both of those things, but the way it used them to set up a punchline was different. it felt more lifelike even when it was absurd, and that's what made it funny. for example, in episode 1 when the principal makes an awkward joke about his baldness, the scene cuts to a silent, blank-faced crowd of students who don't reciprocate his tone (emphasized by them being drawn in a different art style). the scenario feels natural and would be humorous even without the exaggeration, so the visual gag only amplifies it. there were a few good scenes like this in the very first nichijou episode, I didn't see anything like that in city. guy wears skirt because le random, girl and other guy follow him around with camera crew equipment because woah, that's unexpected. it resembles nichijou but in that show the absurdity was never the whole joke (at least not in its best scenes).
>>280884893
you're lying, delusional, or both if you look at pic rel and say it took more effort/resources to create than nichijou. my point wasn't even that it looks bad or sub-par, just that it's obviously not as intensive to make *as nichijou* (oh sorry, is my tone too dismissive?)
