>>280888148
>>280888196
Ok, for the fun of it; let's pretend people move past violence and leaders that foment national fanaticism and warmongering for the sake of distractions and popularity raids fall out of favor. The world is objectively better, and in a very real way it takes power away from the "so called" powerful, as it is the weak that carry the burden and consequence of undue violence.
In you come with a butter knife and try to take over the world. What do you do with that world? Do you go around killing people that don't resist you because you lack any and all empathy? Do you expect people do bend the knee and do what you say because they are non violent?
I say all this because I honestly believe that if there are arguments pro-violence, those are not such arguments, and because it is a genuine mistake to imagine a person is a coward for rejecting violence, when in many cases it is actually easier to go alone and just stomp on those weaker or feel justified on our violent impulses.
