>>280917406
trying? trying what? simply asking to have some transparency and consistency in moderation?
let's not kid ourselves
tit threads where even one remotely negative post about ass is posted are immediately derailed from brigading (if assbrowns aren't already derailing in them, since they seek them out), 90% of posts in the thread get deleted (even if not engaging in the flamewar), and it gets forcefully archived at best, but usually deleted unilaterally
meanwhile ass threads like this:
>get to shitpost about boobs in the very OP
>get to shitpost about boobs the entire thread
>get any negative posts about asses pruned instantly
>posters in them get to spam thinly veiled BBC retardation
and
nothing
ever
happens
except to the posters who point it out
why even have rules for posting to begin with? and the "ridiculing 4chan and its staff" shit is the most bitchmade "rule" to exist on the site, especially when punished for it
all it does is enable malicious moderation where jannies get to protect image dumps and ERP threads they like, while allowing shitposting in, and deleting, threads they don't like that are, for all intents and purposes, the exact same
