>>280923034 (OP)>Why didn't this beat out One Piece and Naruto in popularity during the 2000s?In Japan, Hunter x Hunter was popular.
Its core issue was the number of hiatuses just not making it a consistent seller, since rather than the 4-6 volumes that OP and Naruto would release annually, it'd get 2 or 3 (and then later 1 or 2, and now just 1 or 0).
If you mean why wasn't it popular globally, that's far simpler to explain.
One Piece, Naruto, and Bleach all got their anime brought over around about the same time. Their peaks of popularity happened, people shifted to their respective manga and caught up to that en masse around 2007, and from 2008-2010 was their respective peaks of interest (Marineford, Pain Invasion, the ending of Arrancar).
You may notice a certain thing happening their- they got their anime brought over. Obviously all of them were several years late compared to when they started broadcasting in Japan, but do you want to know how long it took to get Hunter x Hunter's anime brought over? 9 years. It started in 1999 and only started getting released on DVD in 2008, and it didn't even broadcast on American TV until like 2009.
By that point, it not only looked dated but people were already invested in the late stretches of the aforementioned "Big Three".
Honestly, had the Hunter x Hunter anime been brought over in 2004, I think it would've done well and the Big Three would've been the Big Four, because during 2008-2010, that big peak in popularity, HxH was in the middle of the Chimera Ant arc, and it would end in 2011. Even at the time as well, HxH was the highest rated anime and OVA(s) on MAL, a western site, and the 2011 anime took that spot from the 1999 series (which has since fallen off in scoring).
>>280923354>>280924569You guys are falling for like decade old bait.