Thread 281160024

>it's harem shit
>but it's from the perspective of one the harem girls
Who's this supposed to appeal to?

ur mom

>>281160024 (OP)
It's for women.
All women seek the men in the top 20%.
Women are okay with being in a harem so long as the man is sufficiently attractive.

>>281160024 (OP)
Pic unrelatd?

Women are vying for the attention of a very select group of men.

Legalizing polygamy would kill infidelity immediately and would greatly decrease the amount of autists procreating (as autism is a genetic condition).

>>281160119
>Incelspeak

>>281160119
>>281160190
If you actually believe this you're genuinely retarded and brain washed by porn.

>>281160162
By the end of the manga 4+ girls want to fuck Kosuda.

>>281160119
Author is a woman actually.

>>281160119
>This

>>281160024 (OP)
Kosuda was a good guy but I don't remember much competition.

Kuroiwa medaka seems more in line with it. Mona a shit.

>>281160190
>damages your society
https://medium.economist.com/big-love-and-big-war-exploring-the-link-between-polygamy-and-violence-67306fb3c41b

>>281160201
>4+ girls want to fuck Kosuda.
It has been years since I read B gata H kei, I thought it was only two?

>>281160203
Author of shit like Ranma 1/2 and Inuyaha (same author) is a women. They draw harem shit for a paycheck.

>>281160207
This isn't reddit. You can't "upvote" posts.

>>281160214
>incel rage is documented through history, just because Chad's twenty 8/10+ wives will never look at Incelanon.

>>281160119
>Women are okay with being in a harem

>>281160241
You know the irony? That you're saying this as a perma virgin trying to live vicariously through his posts on 4chan.

>>281160214
>economist.com/
trash but polygamy and violence is pretty straightforward.

You could look up JD Unwins book sex and culture

>>281160246
Unironically depends on the caliber of man. yes concubines do compete and screw each other over but can still function as family units when a male or a higher ranking concubine/wife is present.

>>281160190
>Legalizing polygamy would kill infidelity
Only as a technicality you fucking retard. What the fuck would a woman be able to argue if she caught you with someone else? It’s like saying crime would go down if we just legalized robbery.

>>281160119
Allison Mack was at least honest about it.

>>281160191
Also known as
>facts I feel uncomfortable reading

>>281160268
No. This is just you being raised on porn and having zero common sense.
Humans are monogamous by nature. Every single society in human history has independently evolved to be monogamous.

>>281160268
What kind of pathetic sand nigger fantasy is this? Genuinely pathetic to fantasize about such trash. 99% of human society has been monogamous for 99% of human history.

>>281160301
You're just flat out wrong.

>>281160268
>can still function as family units
>one of many holes he can use
>one of his many, many children

>>281160308
>Humans are monogamous by nature
Whatever you do, don't look up the stats for how many men are raising another man's child.
Paternity tests are illegal in France btw

>>281160351
What point are you even trying to make?

>>281160309
Could we argue for sequentially monogamous?

>>281160370
I'm sorry, but that's how women think.
They want all the attention.
Being in a harem make that impossible.

incels get one thing wrong. basically not even 1% men can make harem functional. at most some women might turn blind eye to such man fucking other woman secretly as long as they are official partner and no one else finds out about the side whores also she must think of the women as inferior to her as well so it doesn't hurt her ego. that won't work if she can divorce rape the man btw. what women are completely ok with is getting pumped and dumped by top 20%, if relationship works out, then they are gonna defend that one from other whores like no tomorrow. if she gets dumped then she will jump on another top 20%er and then cycle repeats until they hit the wall and settle down with inferior product.

>>281160308
>Humans are monogamous by nature.
I think there's a lot of variation between groups. some have the mental capaciuty to form very strong bonds that facilitate effective child rearing in harsg environments.
For others it's not been selected for that strongly

>>281160386
I don't even disagree with you, what you said is just unclear.

>>281160366
That has nothing to do with polygamy.

>>281160024 (OP)
What shows actually run with this idea though?
Genuinely curious what examples you have.

>>281160402
You can't make harems function ever because they are inherently against human nature. Sleeping around with multiple people (also being a porn addict) is shown to lower activation in the part of the brain and cause permanent damage to a person's brain in the area that functions when forming relationships. Both platonic and romantic. Human's can only exist through society, and you can't have society without forming relationships. Polygamy has never once in all of human history lead to a stable society.

>>281160476
>Sleeping around with multiple people (also being a porn addict) is shown to lower activation in the part of the brain and cause permanent damage to a person's brain in the area that functions when forming relationships.
Does porn cause similar damage?

>>281160503
Yes. The post you're replying to literally says it.

>>281160503
I think women think so, but men didn't.

>>281160529
This is a fact you can literally confirm with CT scans of the brain that measure neuron activation. It holds true for both men and women.

>>281160476
Polygamy is actively harmful to society. if enough men are left without partners, it can cause a collapse at some point. what I described is not polygamy but will definitely have the same effects. there are way too many men that won't be willing to be the inferior product women will settle for in their late 30s and way too many women double down on their behaviour, they even refuse to settle after 20% doesn't pump them anymore. we might get a collapse 40 years later because of effects of polygamy without polygamy even being a thing.

>>281160526
I should get my eyes tested...

>>281160414
>I think there's a lot of variation between groups.
There really isn't.
Polygamy has never once in the entirety of human history been a part of a stable society.

When you hear interviews with actual polygamists you can see that beyond the surface they aren't really that happy due to the emotinal neglect. So you can have an harem as long as you don't seek an actual relationship, just kids and economic benefits.

>>281160625
>a stable society.
see that's the point you miss, how many have been stable societies and remember that the reates of male mortality are pretty variable

>>281160650
>just kids and economic benefits.
Which will never make anyone happy or content.

>>281160652
*of course only stable societies matter and properly affect the world the rest can't exact real power they're too busy surviving.

>>281160652
>how many have been stable societies
A lot? What point are you trying to make?

>>281160190
It worked for mormons before the bad press from goverment.

Can anyone explain the difference at a practical mate supply level between polygamy and sequential monogamy ie when one wife dies you marry another or they divorce and marry again after the woman is no longer fertile.

Why did Yamada go on that paintball war mission?

>>281160758
It didn't though. And they excommunicated the people who practiced it extremely early on.

>>281160760
>hey divorce and marry again after the woman is no longer fertile.
Humans are not breeding stock.

>>281160567
>if enough men are left without partners, it can cause a collapse at some point
You're supposed to send these men to war or something.

>>281160903
I'm just describing a social pattern that exists.

>>281160990
that wouldn't even work nowadays. you could at least dupe those poor young men into patriotism which includes not only love for your country but expectations of future. if men don't even expect the change for good by fighting for their country, then government will either have to give up on idea of arming them or expect them to become dangerous elements soon. fragging the superiors is like a choice made by huge group of people together. if enough people decide, then military won't even be able to do anything.

>>281160818
Yes, of course.

A strong male with multiple women is unironically better for a society than giving every autist a woman.

>>281162414
For the man sure, for the women not so much, not only it's a financial burden but just like you only get one best friend you can only have one best)main) wife and the rest have to live with the idea that are lower in the love hierarchy.

>>281162414
Nope. That's just you incel power fantasy.

A murderer who says murder is bad is a hippocrite.

>>281162414
No look, the problem is the women.
Your low tier women that would otherwise be paired with the low tier men and not reproduce particularly is instead taken by the mid rank or lower males desperate for any women they can get so bad female genes don't get removed from the gene pool

>>281162695
But they're not wrong. And you are mentally ill.

>>281162711
It's crazy how you actually think what you're saying is sane or rational.

Tu quoque cannot defeat an argument on it's own but severely undermines an unobvious moral position.

>>281162913
Point out the flaw in the logic.

>>281163049
Because don't even sort of act the way you think they do, and your believe is based on porn logic and social media posters on tictok.

>>281163209
No, it's based on observation of marriage statistics.

>>281160308
>Humans are monogamous by nature
not really. marriage is a relatively new concept when you look at our entire history.

>>281160309
>99% of human society has been monogamous for 99% of human history.

>things I came up with out of my ass with zero evidence

>>281160190
I don't care about this trash but I do have problems with retards like you.
Polygamy is not only retarded as hell but also completely backwards from a biological point.
In nature we see all the time how species that stick to one partner for life and have long periods of nurture for their offspring are the ones with the least infant mortality rates, not only that but the longer a family can spend with their offspring the easier it is for them to develop social behaviors and learn how to work as a group.
We see this in birds, primates, and even dogs.
But if you don't like the animal examples we can easily point to the species that made the best use of monogamy: HUMANS.
Not only it allows for the creation of strong family units that nurture children in a environment that allows them to learn social behaviors and Initiate their betters (usually their dads) but also ensures there's enough resources for the kids to survive.
Polygamy is mostly practiced by those who lack the intelligence to benefit from complex social structures

Mohammed was actually poisoned to death by one of his wives. Polygamy isn't all its cracked up to be.

>>281163446
Go ahead and post those statistics.

>>281163535
>>281163573
Marriage are monogamy have literally nothing to do with each other, you absolute window licking retard. Not sleeping around with multiple people doesn't require getting married.

How do you function in the real world being as stupid as you are?

>>281164127
Lmao anyone with an education would be able to tell you that humanity is historically both monogamous and polygamous. You shouldn't just make shit up to support your mentally ill argument, it makes you look even more clueless.

>>281164285
>says "lmao"
>thinks anyone will take him seriously
>his "argument" is "i- i have an education"
>doesn't even attempt to cite sources
>thinks acting like a /b/tard with reactions images is normal

>>281160119
>All women
We got a woman expert here, on 4chan of all places too.
A unicorn in our trash heap.

>>281164370
>you have to cite a source to disprove my claim without a source
Not how it works
For the love of god, go back and graduate highschool

>>281164485
>still no source
>still using porn logic
>still acting like a /b/tard
Polygamy has been illegal in 95% of the world for centuries.
Your mental illness will never be accepted by anyone except 3rd worlders.

Why can't you guys just discuss the anime or manga why do you have to be this way?

>>281160024 (OP)
Decent show.

>>281160308
>monogamous by nature

If this is true why are women whores? It’s abortions galore and riding the cock carousel with an absolute refusal to be attached to anyone in the name of “independence” (not from the state, of course) when they get their way.

This is Rome. It collapsed because of birthrates (like every other great empire). They tried immigration, the fix that never fixes, and just replaced themselves with Goths. http://www.rhm.uni-koeln.de/128/Devine.pdf

Monogamy is a man-made technology to create civilisation. But “humans” aren’t monogamous, necessarily. Women want to be creampied by as many men as possible, which is why in those primitive matriachies with zulu dances, huts and child sacrifices (women are obsessed with abortions), many men would cream one girl and 99% of the men would not know who their child is, or if they even passed on their gene. This was apparently “good”.

>>281166753
It's funny how saying humans are monogamous by nature triggers sex obsessed incels so much.
You are literally brain washed by tictoc shorts. Normal people don't act the way you think they do.

>>281166753
There's this developmental effect on girls exposed I think it was about the number of close male relatives around the as they pass their teenage years. it triggers a more r type psychology and an earlier puberty because lots of unfamiliar males would be associated with your tribe taken over by outsiders

>>281164754
/r9k/eks can't keep their projections to themselves.

>>281160109
No ur dad

>>281168638
nuh uh

>>281160246
Women would rather be one of Brad Pitt's thousand wives than be with an average an*n, so yeah.

>>281160119
Nope. Women have 0 interest in sharing, if she enters a harem it’s only to grab the #1 spot. And they’ll only go that far for the top 0.01%.

>>281160308
>>281164127
>Humans are monogamous by nature
Do you realize that we have twice as many female ancestors as male? Fucking idiot

>>281160308
You can literally check the genetic history of humanity and see that at one point almost every woman was reproducing but only like 10% of men were successfully reproducing
Every single society on earth has also independently come up with the concept of powerful men having mistresses or concubines or simply multiple wives whereas polyandry is virtually unheard of in all human history, barring extremely hyper specific shit like one region of Tibet where it's driven by LEGAL requirements that small parcels of arable land can't be divided between two sons, so they're forced to share a wife

>>281170338
>>281170487
It's funny watching the asshurt incel aggressively samefag at that post.

>Every single society on earth has also independently come up with the concept of powerful men having mistresses or concubines or simply multiple wives
Except you're wrong. And you are talking about extremely niche cases that you can only list a handful of out of the hundreds of billions of humans that have existed.

Murder is something that happened in all societies as well. Doesn't mean it's normal for humans to act like that. Again, >>281160476
Literal objective fact you can measure proves humans are supposed to be polymerous.

>stacy
>beautiful
>cute VA(american dub really accentuates her bitchiness, imo)
>wants to be a slut but her heart wont let her
>grows to be a loving girlfriend
I love yamada so much

>>281170756
Funnily enough, Monogamy today is probably rarer than murder (which would be far more common without the nanny state).

What was the original meaning of monogamy for like a millennia, one partner, for life? Imagine that.

>>281171359
Stop being brainwashed by tictoc.

>>281160308
Haven't seen cope this big in a while kek

>>281170756
>More than half of the men in history
>extremely niche cases that you can only list a handful of out of the hundreds of billions of humans that have existed
We have been hunter-gatherers longer than living in "society" as you like to say. There is no right or "natural" way for humans to live, only the one that works. Also, learn to express yourself in other ways besides using buzzwords all the time.
>P-porn addict! i-incel!

>>281168093
If you assume that /r9k/ gets its reputation from being an incel place then maybe 4chan is just an extension of there and not the other way around. Most of us here are incels, your fault for bringing the topic to discussion.

>>281170898
No human cares about dubs so it doesn't matter

>>281171685
>spouts /v/ buzz words
>thinks anyone will take him seriously

>>281171693
You do realize early society is still society, right?
Guess what? Those hunter-gatherers worked in groups, i.e. were social with each other.

How do you live being this dumb?

>>281172276
buzzwords is a buzzword itself + I did not use plural buzzwordS. You lost

>>281160119
t. talks more about women than with women

>>281170898
She really was perfect.

>>281167716
Unironically source?

>>281172506
I wish I could remember.

>>281172330
>I did not use plural buzzwordS
You did. And lost what? You name calling doesn't mean anything.

>>281172328
>Only 40% of men in history have reproduced
>More than 80% of women in history have done so
How many times do I have to repeat it to you before you get it straight you fucking retarded cunt? And again, your way of speaking and expressing yourself is disgusting, just like a real redittor would do it

>>281173096
You could start by stating actual facts and not random guess work made up by a single "researcher".

>a- anything i no liek REDDIT!!
Ask me how I know you're a newfag trying really hard to fit in. Hell, you're too new and stupid to even know how to format green text correctly.

>>281172184
misty's VA was iconic

>>281173096
NTA but you are a retard. you are mixing up polygamy and men fucking around everywhere. cases of a man having 2 wives wouldn't even be quarter of that. more like sailors, soldiers and such putting out bastards far from home, cheating partners, children born out of wedlock. do I even have to mention that a man can fuck as many women as he wants and marry just one later in life? no major religion besides Islam tolerates polygamy and even that one is in historical context.

>>281171955
I didn't. >>281160119 did.

>>281170898
>literal rip off of Shion from Xenosaga
>who was a rip off of Sarah Michelle Geller
Is all templates in anime character design?

>>281171955
>Most of us here are incels,
Virgin isn't the same as incel. Incel is a mindset.

>>281173851
incel is an insult that normalfags direct at losers like us gramps. get on with times.

>>281173917
It's hardly even an "insult" anymore.
More so just stating facts.

>>281160119
Unironically this
Women are cool proven the other girls arent a threat and cant be blamed/shamed on by participating
>t. had two gfs. they were BFF are went to different schools so no one knew about it

>>281160255
>seething this badly
Take it up with the article kek, that's literally what it's implying

>>281172812
unholy ESL

>>281160024 (OP)
Still the best Yukari Tamura role.

>>281175543
It's funny watching people make up blatant lies like this in an attempt to live vicariously through posts on 4chan.

>>281175838
What article? You didn't link anything. You spammed /v/ buzz words.

>>281176214
>completely losing it and can barely even follow a comment chain
South Sudan cuck...

>>281170898
>dub when we had professional level fansubs

I remember the incest ojou.

>>281160119
Only if they're the alpha female. The Empress lording over the concubines.

>>281176510
It's just so funny how the only thing you can do is name call.

>>281160119
This post triggered all the tourists kek

>>281178111
You can stop replying to yourself. It's. It really isn't normal to keep spamming "kek" like a /v/tard.

>>281160301
If it was a fact, then we would see it more often in real life. Perhaps your "fact" is actually just your fetish; which is a fine fetish to have.

>>281179485
>which is a fine fetish to have.
It's really not. It's literal mental illness.
The term fetish technically means a sexual desire that negatively effects your life. Poly shit objectively makes your life worse because it ruins your ability to form relationships.

>>281179485
Kill yourself and to hell with you and your fetishes.
>>281179568
That's not the only problem with polygamy. It's just bad from any angle you see it as long as you have common sense I think. It's absolute degeneracy, satanic even. It's part of extreme left ideology and the "LGBTQ collective" for a reason.

>>281163971
In some African cultures that practice polygamy, the husband and his wives all eat from the same big bowl, so none of the wives can poison him or another wife without also posioning themselves.