>>281354559
>>281349617
>>281348978
I haven't been in a JoJo thread for about five years, but when did 'complex' become a meaningless buzzword.
I genuinely cannot tell what complex is meant to mean in most of these posts, and it feels like the word is being tossed around in lieu of 'writing I like/prefer'.
>>281354793
I don't really get why you're so upset and so intent on comparing Hokuto no Ken to JoJo.
The only really comparable beats between the two are Part 1 and the first section of HnK (something that comes to mind is Part 1 literally quoting the reunion of Kenshiro and Shin, with both Johnathan and Kenshiro saying something to the effect of "I've returned from hell").
Beyond that, they're not really similar, and Hokuto no Ken isn't focused on complex villains. Hokuto no Ken is a story of archetypes, which, again, is fine.
It's Romance of the Three Kingdoms mixed with several kilos of Chinese/Japanese spirituality. Kenshiro is the pragmatic disciple with the supreme power who encounters conflict.
First is Shin, who reflects raw desire and twisted love, where the love Kenshiro has for Yuria is taken and Shin fails to grasp what made that love special.
The next is Jagi, a man who only feels hate- for Kenshiro. He seeks to become him, his own identity being forfeit in the face of the power Kenshiro holds (and in a stroke of genius, he rarely appears in flashbacks).
Strong love and strong hate give way to Raoh and Toki. Toki is the idealized figure who one thinks Kenshiro should be, but he is a temporary fixture, one to guide further growth but not to inherit everything.
Raoh is directly opposed to Kenshiro, and both men love Yuria more than anything. The power of might makes right vs the power to nurture life, no matter how weak.
And so on and so on. These are not traditionally complex characters, but they don't have to be. They are facets of a narrative that add value to the narrative journey.