>>281415998
I think the problem was initially about hard work and talent in the army or something.
>1 hardworking and talented
Suitable for being seconds and form the backbone of the company.
>2 lazy and talented
Suitable for being bosses because in their laziness they are good at streamlining operations and delegating to 1.
>3 lazy and untalented
Suitable for doing odd jobs and menial tasks under the orders of 1 who will pick up the slack and make sure things get done.
>4 hardworking and untalented
Do not touch even with a ten foot pole because they will do a lot and will do it badly, causing a lot of damage in the process.
