>>281606915
I don't care anymore. AI generation is the inevitable future.
Because meat drones are too expensive, and they always need to eat, sleep, and be paid wages.
AI is still terrible, but it's cheap.
Damn it.
>>281606985
What if they use AI to first generate the frame but then just use it for reference in the actual drawing process by hand.
Would that still be considered AI slop?
>>281607147
yes because that's still wasting more time and resources via hugely inefficient serverbanks training these things compared to just paying an artist to sketch up a first draft of the storyboard , and the artist using it as a reference is going to have to put more work into identifying and correcting the mistakes made in the reference material or worse, assume they're meant to be that way and just go with it
>>281607147
This question is no longer important; time will fix it.
AI is evolving super fast thanks to better algorithms and hardware.
One day, AI-generated content will be better than what humans make.
When that happens, unless you're one of the top artists in the industry, no one will hire you.
>>281606985
Don't complain about human nature like that, calling them "meat drones".. You said that with such disdain. Human effort is a beautiful thing.
