Anonymous
8/20/2025, 6:35:39 PM
No.281618561
>>281619019
>>281619226
>>281619313
>>281619580
>>281619713
>>281619894
>>281620487
>>281624228
>>281625195
>>281628950
>>281629363
>>281629715
>>281630805
>>281631418
>>281631453
>>281632189
>>281637469
>>281637642
>>281639328
>>281640107
>>281641012
>Protagonist uses their "life energy" to get a power boost and grasp victory after everything seemed hopeless
This is such awful writing. Why is it so frequently used?
There's two main variations of this and they are both absolute garbage plot devices.
>The "decreases lifespan" variation
This is a lazy attempt at making it seem more serious and high stakes without having any real impact. It doesn't matter if the MC is going to die at 72yrs old instead of 83yrs. It makes no actual difference to the story since it inevitably ends long before the MC becomes old. It's functionally just a free power up with no cost
>The "they're going to die instantly if they end up using all of their life-force" variation
This one is slightly better since at least there are immediate and real potential consequences within the actual time-frame of the story. The problem is that usually this is in a fight against some powerful antagonist who would have killed them anyways.
This creates a really stupid hole in consistency, because it implies anyone in the story could become massively powerful if only they just use their "life's energy", but only the MC is brave/reckless enough to do so.
But in that case why doesn't every other character who is going to die use this technique? It's not like they have anything to lose. There's no reason anyone would choose to lose a fight and die when they could use their "life force" to get more powerful at the last second and potentially turn the tables.
The conclusion is that everyone can and should use that technique, and if everyone does, it's the same as no one doing it.
It basically makes it so that every single character death in the story becomes a massive plot hole from that point on, unless for some reason they didn't know they could use "life energy" to get stronger, or else you at least outright state or imply that they did in fact do so and still lost afterwards.
This is such awful writing. Why is it so frequently used?
There's two main variations of this and they are both absolute garbage plot devices.
>The "decreases lifespan" variation
This is a lazy attempt at making it seem more serious and high stakes without having any real impact. It doesn't matter if the MC is going to die at 72yrs old instead of 83yrs. It makes no actual difference to the story since it inevitably ends long before the MC becomes old. It's functionally just a free power up with no cost
>The "they're going to die instantly if they end up using all of their life-force" variation
This one is slightly better since at least there are immediate and real potential consequences within the actual time-frame of the story. The problem is that usually this is in a fight against some powerful antagonist who would have killed them anyways.
This creates a really stupid hole in consistency, because it implies anyone in the story could become massively powerful if only they just use their "life's energy", but only the MC is brave/reckless enough to do so.
But in that case why doesn't every other character who is going to die use this technique? It's not like they have anything to lose. There's no reason anyone would choose to lose a fight and die when they could use their "life force" to get more powerful at the last second and potentially turn the tables.
The conclusion is that everyone can and should use that technique, and if everyone does, it's the same as no one doing it.
It basically makes it so that every single character death in the story becomes a massive plot hole from that point on, unless for some reason they didn't know they could use "life energy" to get stronger, or else you at least outright state or imply that they did in fact do so and still lost afterwards.