← Home ← Back to /a/

Thread 281643253

30 posts 28 images /a/
Anonymous No.281643253 >>281644134 >>281644238 >>281644680
>this scares modern anime publishers
Anonymous No.281643274
and censorship apologists too
Anonymous No.281643839
false
Anonymous No.281644125
true + industy shill seething
Anonymous No.281644134 >>281644240
>>281643253 (OP)
?
Anonymous No.281644238
>>281643253 (OP)
Panties are worse than piracy.
Anonymous No.281644240 >>281644260
>>281644134
? what is even that? did a 9yo draw it?
Anime industry shill ran out of images.
Anonymous No.281644260 >>281644361 >>281644791 >>281645845
>>281644240
?
Anonymous No.281644352
Post that Takamine-san
Anonymous No.281644361 >>281644395
>>281644260
?
Anonymous No.281644393 >>281644433
? why is anime industry shill using a censored anime?


?

?
Anonymous No.281644395
>>281644361
Pantsu...
Anonymous No.281644429
?
Anonymous No.281644433 >>281644528
>>281644393
That's not censored
Anonymous No.281644528 >>281644619
>>281644433
? you lost, you always usep anty and stocking to defend modern anime. But everyone knows panties get censored
you're not fooling anyone
Anonymous No.281644565
Panty&Stocking fags are as annoying as they were years ago, or somehow even worse because of gen z.
Anonymous No.281644570 >>281644791
more (no pantyshot) anime
Anonymous No.281644600
if anyone doesn't know pantyshots became illegal in japan (anime publishers can't do them)
Anonymous No.281644619 >>281644791
>>281644528
Pantyschizo, the proportions and angling is all wrong in the right image I’m glad they fixed it
Anonymous No.281644680 >>281644706
>>281643253 (OP)
>blue arrows on a grey background
I miss when shitposters were smart enough to make low effort edits that at least follow basic design principles
Anonymous No.281644706 >>281644915
>>281644680
you lost, censorship apologist
OP makes a point
Anonymous No.281644791 >>281644830
>>281644260
that's not pantyshots,

Pantyshot = panchira = girl accidently shows her panties.
Or camera like >>281644570 shows panties in a sexualized manner. without the girl knowing.

they don't do that in anime anymore because it's illegal in japan

>>281644619
you are attacking manga artist just to defend the censored anime design

desperate shill. you lost.
Anonymous No.281644830 >>281644915 >>281644917
>>281644791
Like this then
Anonymous No.281644915 >>281644944
>>281644706
For the sake of fairness, I'll say this shit >>281644830 is equally illegible.
Anonymous No.281644917
>>281644830
NONE of them are pantyshots and 95% of them are girls changing
You used the ranma demake and 2.5D seduction known for HEAVY censorship too

i can't believe the local anime industry shill doesn't even know what it means

The only anime that's so close is Dandadan. (but exception because made by a new studio)

Something like this. Where are the panties?
Anonymous No.281644944
>>281644915
stop replying to yourself, schizo shill
I alreayd posted more examples than you
Anonymous No.281644996
Hey shills. You lost

pantyshots are banned in modern anime.

No panservice allowed. And you're coping if you think you can post the same image over and over to defend modern anime


The fact that you attacked the manga author of "Ruri rocks" just to say "anime fixed it" proves you're all unhinged censorship apologists and shills
Anonymous No.281645814
Manga > Anime

But for how long? Japan will inevitably fall, the WEF and other globohomo types are going to win.
Anonymous No.281645845
>>281644260
Kneesocks being best girl, as usual.
Anonymous No.281646885
>pointing at the panties
>completely ignoring the uncovered breasts
I know it's bait but its still funny