>>282022740
Is it a narrative if it is an empirically verifiable fact that shitposting activity increases whenever you respond? If you have no way of altering the response of your boogeyman to your rebuffs, you are morally culpable for the consequences. If you pour termite over wood in a school and it causes a fire, you are not somehow loosed and morally absolved from the consequences of your actions just because you don't like the fact that certain chemical reactions work the way they do. It's called the reciprocity of the virtues; the virtues are distinct from each other, but absent the others, each virtue by itself is imperfect and deficient. True moral virtue requires prudence, phronesis, practical virtue; since justice is determined by context, one must apply epieikeia, equity, to bring about perfect justice in accordance with the circumstances, which requires discrimination and discernment. Absent practical wisdom, one cannot determine what is most just in any one given scenario. You are wholly bereft of phronesis, so cannot grasp how your shitposts exacerbate your trolls' own baiting. Your attempts to redress minor injustices bring about greater ones. That is impractical, and you bear moral responsibility for the outcome of your actions. So yes. It is your fault.
