>>283051825
>You can see it with how the LDP has been in power almost continuously since 1955
IMO, the state of LOGH do not portray the LDP, it's only the usual set of flaws of democracies. As pointed out earlier
>>283036196 the FPA politic was healthy and subject to serious change.
>Since Yang represents this angst with the political system, disliking it but not doing anything about it out of principle, he also turns out to be more of a warning to the reader of what happens if you let everything to go shit.
Not wrong, but Wang simply did the equivalent of chickening out as soon as he didn't have anyone else taking responsibility for his action.
A Democracy is meant to be defended by any citizen, regardless of what others think or do about it, the end result must always be democratic.
And that's where Yang failed, he pretend to love democracy but didn't fight for it.
>On a similar bend, Reinhard and his empire is nearly a fantasy-tier scenario where everything aligns and the government unfucks itself with a despot at the top
You just pointed out here why the sudden change of mind at the end is worth nothing.
From the moment Reinhard take power, the story promotes top-down decision-making and make bottom-up democracy into a joke.
The author may not intend it, but he did make an autocracy-wank. Not the first time a story would send the opposite message by accident.
It doesn't help that it is very hard to make the process and qualities of democracy into a fun story. Especially while keeping Yang important over "collective wisdom".