>>283393574
>thinks what constitutes good and bad artwork is detail
midwit detected. togashi's talent and technique shines through in the nitty gritty fundamentals that are actually necessary for narrative art like manga and not paintings. his gesture drawings, fight choreography, motion blur lines, afterimage drawings, realistic facial expressions, crosshatching techniques emphasizing anatomy, kakeami crosshatching, panel composition, usages of interesting pov angles, general storyboarding and scene flow, general laying of panels, the myriad of panel shapes he uses from rectangular black spaces, to "magnifying glass effect" small panels showcasing one body part during quick movements, to extremely small honeycomb style panel grids showcasing characters reactions all to better illustrate the flow of time and mood during a scene is among the best in all of manga I've ever read. any serious artist worth his salt will be able to see this VERY clearly. you on the other hand are a simple minded buffoon who gets easily impressed by shiny things like details that anyone can do given enough time. you are a midwit, so don't go around critiquing a master's art when you understand none of it, you little worthless talentless piece of shit shounenshitter maggot. kill yourself, unironically, your kind are why more shit manga are coming out.
