Thread 283607100

If a short girl with large breasts is a shortstack or an oppai loli, then what is a short girl with a flat chest but wide hips and plump thighs/butt?
they can't be shortstacks as well since the term "stacked" refers to the breasts

>>283607100 (OP)
I can see her pussy this is nsfw

The obvious title would be "Shortcake"

>>283607158
I concurr.
Meeting adjourned.

>>283607158
Wisdom.

>>283607100 (OP)
A midna.

Kyojiri.

>>283607100 (OP)
This pic is going to the feetfolder

it's called bottom heavy.

>>283607265
>seconds before leglock cunnilingus

>>283607100 (OP)
>then what is a short girl with a flat chest but wide hips and plump thighs/butt?
The best, that's what.

>>283607100 (OP)
Nobody cares to make a distinction for short. It's just a pear body.

>>283607245
Sort of like oppai, right?

>>283607100 (OP)
child bearing hips

>>283607100 (OP)
>they can't be shortstacks as well since the term "stacked" refers to the breasts
You would think so, but I've seen the term shortstack being used for them, as well.

>>283608502
Because shortstacks typically also have thick thighs and big butts along with huge tits. They're stacked all over.

>>283607100 (OP)
Elin

>>283607158
This term clould get confusing. Cake has connotations already, some of these aren't cake.

>>283607141
Then stop looking, you pervert

Pear shaped supremacy

>>283607158
The perfect name for the perfect body plan.

>>283608200
Yes. Kyojiri (巨尻) means "big ass", so a kyojiri loli is a loli with wide hips/fat ass, like Kanna.

>>283607100 (OP)
people have been trying to coin the term shortcake but I still prefer pear

>>283607100 (OP)
I thought it was called pear body but >>283607158 works too

>>283608847
why is she naked if she is seemingly just arrived home and taken her shoes off?

>>283607245
I don't like this term, it feels like a hot word on the FBI watchlist

>>283607158
When I hear a woman described as a cake, I think of an older single woman, not a woman with wide hips and plump thighs.

>>283607100 (OP)
Pear shaped

zoomers obsession with overcategorization should be studied

>>283610640
Millennials started it with x-core, y-core, etc.

>>283607100 (OP)
they are built for tight hotdogging, with accidentally slipping your dick into them

>>283610640
It's not "overcategorization" to want a term for a very specific archetype.

>>283610776
yes that's exactly what overcategorization is

>>283610640
the new shortcake thing is just so one guy can make lolicon threads on /v/ without getting nuked by mods immediately.

>>283607100 (OP)
kill yourself

>>283610776
Sometimes it's necessary. It's better to go too far in that direction than the opposite where people try to expand a term or shift the definition to include things that are completely different.

>>283610328
That's because you're thinking of christmas cake
Cake is also commonly used to refer to the ass

>>283610901
That happened pretty badly with tomboy, to the point where that word has barely any meaning

>>283610959
ironically enough tomboy has been so misused that I think ye olden definition of how it was used is now no longer a tomboy now.

>>283607100 (OP)
thicc lolis.

>>283610946
It has never been used like that on /a/, there's only ever been christmas cake and delicious cake.

>>283607158
I call her a cupcake.

>>283610946
says who

>>283610946
You're missing one

>>283610959
Tomboy had the opposite problem as this thread where it's so vague it can apply to anything, I'm pretty sure at its core it's just girl that acts/looks masculine and doesn't act feminine
The thing is society has never been able to pin down what masculine is supposed to be over all of history so everyone has a different definition of what masculine is at this point, and the same for what a girl is supposed to act like

>>283611472
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cake

>>283607100 (OP)
The "Sexo"

>>283607158

Anything "cake" just sounds like a description of a hag...

>>283613042
Christmas cake isn't the first kind of cake I think of desu

Caked-up cunny

>>283607158
/Thread

>>283611218
touch grass, literally. go outside and talk to people.

>>283610328
ESL or just autism?

>>283607158
Sage knowledge has been shared with us on this most holy day.

>>283610946
An I hear cake used for Christmas cakes way more than for butts. At least around here.

>>283616100
u caked up sister fr fr

Rather than top heavy or bottom heavy, I like my girls middle heavy.
I like my girls heavy in the waist, but I can also see their ribs. Only one thing produces this lovely combo

>>283607100 (OP)
Loli = body type has always been a retarded coping argument.
Loli is slang for "lolita" which specifically refers to young girls between the ages of 9 and 14, based off the original novel.
Petite adult women are not lolitas.
Midgets and fantasy races are not lolitas.

>>283616367
>Pregnant loli
Absolute fucking diamonds

>>283616693
Even if you think that we have Gohou lolis and lolibabas to refer to not underage lolis.

>>283616693
The term loli has nothing to do with Nabokov's novel beyond it's popularity inspiring the name
The first ever usage of "lolita complex" was by a magazine editor to refer to his infatuation with college students of a particular school, which he deemed as cuter than another institution's

Neotony

>>283616885
Got a source for that?

>>283616774
At this point this shit doesn't mean anything beyond erokawaii

>>283607100 (OP)
Shortstacks need to have both tits *and* ass
Where to do you think the stack comes from?

>>283608765
Based and true

>>283620141
Zamn

>>283620141
Pretty good

Shortcake loli cunny ass thread

>>283616100
>hey /a/ just be a normalfag
Where do you think you are? Go back to tiktok, you stupid zoomer newfag.

>>283620141
Pretty awful

>>283607100 (OP)
Sexpear

>>283620141
Choppy animation is choppy.
The problem with AI animation right now is that when the framerate is too high, it has an uncanny valley effect, yet it can't convincingly replicate the way anime is typically animated on the 3's, so when the framerate is more anime-like, it just looks choppy instead of like quality human-drawn animation on the 3's.
I don't think a model is going to get anime-style animation right until they train one solely on anime, and even then it might not get it right.
I have yet to see an AI-animated anime-style clip that I thought looked great.

>>283607100 (OP)
HEY WAIT A MINUTE
WE JUST HAD A KYOJIRI THREAD

>>283621348
god. I'm glad I'm not the only one. I haven't been able to watch anything on an actual tv for 10-15 years because they switched to a higher frame rate. For some reason it's fine on a computer though (probably something related to compression algorithms)

zamn

So many pics and movement about Tasumaki she appeared like 30 secs on s1 and s2 in fact her sister has more screen time.

>>283621894
The manga featured both in a special chapter that was made pretty early on. That kickstarted them hard.

>>283607100 (OP)
shartstock

>>283608847
What character/artist is this, reverse image searching is not helping

>>283623720
Filename, anon.

>>283623720
Shit, it's ai

>like image
>who made that image
>oh it's AI
>shit now I don't like it
Mental illness.

>>283607100 (OP)
the word you're looking for is "disgusting"

>>283623834
I do still like the image, I saved it and all, but now that I've figured it's ai, I can't help but to see the imperfections/inconsistencies, which does bring it down a peg
Ai art can produce something that looks good, but I can't respect it fully

>>283623889
>I can't help but to see the imperfections/inconsistencies
The stairs are a rather glaring flaw, yes.
The difference between a slopgenner and an actual artist is an actual artist will fix that with effort and inpainting, and possibly using an image editor to guide the inpainting.
AI is absolutely a tool which can be used to create art. Artists have control over all seven elements of art with AI tools like Controlnet, and AI-generated images can be refined to be flawless via inpainting, which can sometimes take hours of genuine hard work by an artist.
Most people just input a prompt and post what the model shits out on the internet, though, leading to people having a dismissive attitude towards AI-generated imagery because almost all they see is lazy, glaringly-flawed dogshit.

>>283621348
Also, anime is often animated with variable speed that fits the motion.

>>283624238
Yeah, it's usually on the 3's but is sometimes on the 2's or 1's as needed.
An AI model obviously isn't going to be able to know what is appropriate for each distinct motion.

>>283623834
Being interested in the artist implies interest in a consistent artstyle. How often do genners stay put on a single style?

>>283624323
Did Picasso stay put on a single style?

>>283624323
Did Miles Davis stay put on a single style?

>>283624341
>>283624376
Ganges drinking mind cannot comprehend why others don't worship its god

>>283610640
Millennials' obsession with zoomers should be studied.
Boomers' obsession with overcategorization was already studied 25 years ago in the book "Otaku: Japan's database animals". A great book btw, highly recommended to any anime fan.

>>283624394
Here, I'll answer the question for you:
No, Picasso and Miles Davis did not stay put on a single style. In fact, both were renowned for constantly evolving their style and consistently staying at the forefront of the evolution of their respective artforms for long periods of time.
And no, I am not a jeet.
Please improve your rhetoric.

>>283624341
No, but do you like all of Picasso's art? I think his cubist period art is the nicest to look at, but don't really care about the rest. Call me a philistine, but for me the artist is basically a keyword for more shit in a given style. Obviously it drifts over time, but I don't think an abrupt shift in style is desirable from casual appreciation perspective.
Nowadays I think people publish under alts for such stylistic jumps if they do them. Genners switch styles as often as their prompt changes, which makes the keyword function of their handle fairly useless.

>>283624500
>No, but do you like all of Picasso's art?
I don't like any of it haha. I do like most of Miles Davis' output, though.
I think I get what you're trying to say, though.
I don't think you're trying to argue AI-generated images can't be art, and >>283624341 and >>283624376 were meant to point out that if that's what you were arguing when you said >>283624323 then that's a really bad way of arguing it.
Now I think you're saying it's understandable to be disappointed when you discover an image you like is AI because that implies there's a good chance there's not a lot more like it for you to consume because genners change style so often.
If that's what you're saying, that's completely reasonable.

>>283624577
>an image you like is AI because that implies there's a good chance there's not a lot more like it for you to consume because genners change style so often
In practice yes. I'd prefer that they simply share the prompt and model/LoRA's used instead.

>>283608765
Sadly it doesn't exist in real life.

>>283624633
>I'd prefer that they simply share the prompt and model/LoRA's used instead.
Yeah obviously that's something you'll see more on Civitai than other places.
I think some genners are reluctant to share what artist tags they're using because they don't want artists to get butthurt they're using their tags.
The way I feel about that is encapsulated by the following song lyrics:
And if the whole world's singing your songs
And all of your paintings have been hung
Just remember what was yours
Is everyone's from now on
And that's not wrong or right
But you can struggle with it all you like
You'll only get uptight

>>283624663
>Yeah obviously that's something you'll see more on Civitai than other places.
Why can't it stay in those places? When I go to pixiv I expect human drawn stuff, not hip-hop-esque art sampling. Genners publishing their shit in places that aren't for genning in specific just muddles the puddle in a bad way.
We need reverse search that points to such places instead of generic boorus and old-school art platforms by proxy.

>>283624891
I think posting it on Pixiv is fine if you check the box that says it's AI so those who wish to filter it can.
It's the people who intentionally don't do that to get more views/bookmarks/likes who are being assholes about it. They know exactly what they're doing.
>Why can't it stay in those places?
Civitai and Pixiv have different rules and that's a part of it.

>>283620141
*3 hands at one point
try again

>>283616693
>refers to young girls between the ages of 9 and 14, based off the original novel.
Incorrect. The term Nabokov used for those girls was "nymphet", not lolita.

>>283610640
internet generations put more emphasis on naming tropes and archetypes because of the importance of tag-based search engines
source: I made it the fuck up

>>283623834
>that girl is hot
>oh beneath that mask it's a tranny
>shit now I don't like it
Perfectly normal.

>>283623834
perfectly valid sentiment, slopper

>>283626594
>that girl is hot
>it's a tranny

No tranny was ever hot

>>283607100 (OP)
I would rape her feet

>>283624663
>because they don't want artists to get butthurt
No, it's because aitards not only think it takes skill (lmao) to write a prompt but they are also arrogant and hypocritical enough to think that a prompt is their property so they don't want anyone else to "steal" it.

>>283626739
It can be "good enough" for those with low standards.
So also like AI.

>>283627137
>It can be "good enough"

It can't, if you fell for a tranny you were a fag from the very beginning.

>thread derailed into a retarded argument
>pic is not even AI
At least I know I'm talking to real people, because no AI can fake that level of genuine retardation.

>>283627176
You get used to it

>>283607100 (OP)
Feet

>>283610776
People will call you pedo still regardless of what you call these girls

I too like anime girls that have no boobs, but a big ass

Flatties with big butts are the best

>>283608444
A Child, bearing hips.

green

>>283620473
It gave her 3 hands.

cool thread

Bottom heavy flat-chests are meant to be shared with anons

>>283607100 (OP)
PSP
Portable
Plap
Station

We call them "Built".

what

>>283607100 (OP)
>>283607158
You've already made this thread. I've already seen this "conversation" three times now. You need to stop.

You need to slop

Slop this, slop that
I just want to sloppily make out with a cute girl's butt

What do I even spend my candies on when my mono depressed is fully rank 7?

>>283628319
kek

>>283607158
>>283607245
Shortcake is clever and goes with shortstack but kyojiri loli goes with oppai loli. And I know on which side I am.

>>283635085
People use both shortstack and loli depending on the context, why can't we?

>>283627899
This is the black pill

I fucking love pears/bottom heavy/shrotcake/kyojiri so much

>>283638056
You know this may sound a little extreme but I think this guy is the greatest artist who ever lived.

>>283638128
It's really too bad that this manga was axed

>>283627899
Damn