Thread 9008264

Thread for AI generated videos.

Thread Rules:
>No low effort or low quality gens
>No glitchy gens
>No spamming

see
>>>/g/ldg for guides and technical support

>Low end cards: https://rentry.org/AnimAnon-AnimDiff
>High end cards: https://rentry.org/wan21kjguide
https://rentry.org/wan22ldgguide

Previous thread: >>8974159

I tired to make the guy suck on the woman's breasts, but the prompt didn't get it. Hopefully someone else can try to do this better.

>>9008268
What are you using to make this one?

>>9008700
Wish this happened in the movie

>>9008264 (OP)
Do you have the original unanimated version of this?

Requesting an animation for this pic.

>>9008264 (OP)
Is there a good low VRAM solution for img/vid? specially if I can use more than one picture frame as reference (2- 3 ideally.)

>>9008957
Someone let me know if there is anything good that isnt behind a paywall

>>9008975
That too.

>>9008945
https://civitai.com/posts/3772322

>>9009043
Thank you.

Anyone got anything good with Elastigirl?

>>9010141
I tried

Can someone animate this?
https://twitter.com/AlmightyPatty/status/1976428180841050174

>>9010510
Its a bit of a start

>>9008700
The fact that nobody did this in the movie is a crime. I would like to see more of this but taking it further by seeing the guy slam or even motorboat those titties

Trying to animate a few old image generations that I liked. The penetration itself isn't fantastic, I'm finding, at least with my present setup.

>>9011950
What workflow and settings did you use?

>>9011983
That was starting with comfyui's default template for wan 2.2 (I had tried the one in the rentry guide up top and got errors that were to me unintelligible), with the "DR34ML4Y" I2V lora added in at full strength, and an interpolater to get to 32fps, um...that was RIFE VFI, using rife49.pth.

Otherwise didn't touch the settings, apart from adjusting the desired resolution to be appropriate for the relative dimensions of the original image.

But I'm also trying out now a merged checkpoint, "Smooth Mix Wan 2.2". Just made this with that, which actually I think turned out pretty well. Not as directly sexual but...well, matter of opinion on that, I suppose.

>>9011985
>>9011986
I use stability matrix for keeping track of my models but it looks like I still have to find and download some other stuff, in my case I want to try using first frame-last frame or even more than 2 frames for control, but I need to get all other components like motion loras and stuff, it is quite a mess.

>>9011540
Them tits need to be moving to do the job here.

Requesting an animation for this pic.

>>9012075
Yeah, hence the request.

does anyone use grok video here?

>>9012902
There are a few users

I just started getting into this. there doesn't seem to be many good loras on civitai, was there a purge? or is there just not that much? It feels really hard to get started learning compared to years ago when I picked up standard SD.

>>9012971
What are you looking for?

>>9012975
I figured to get started I would just learn to have my characters do some basic tiktok dances. I can't seem to get it done with the base model. the 'wan2.2 i2v 14b Q6_k' models is what i'm trying right now.

>>9012987
I see, I am not familiar with the animated stuff, only trying to get it to work using frame references, but most of the time the model basically does nothing, either fades into a blank picture or wildly deforms it.

Grok's not that bad, especially while it's free. I approve.

>>9013112
How is grok working for everyone else?

>>9013112
Not a fan of it destroying the resolution or adding random sounds, though.

>>9013116
Grok doesnt work even if you’re using the free version for me

>>9013117
It might have to do with your twitter account and whether or not it's verified or has the checkmark idk

>>9013119
I wonder if thats the case, any chance for making this one show the boobs?

>>9013121
Through Grok? Probably not. I'll give it a try on tensor.art tomorrow when I get my free credits back (or you can try it).

>>9013137
Didnt expect to see breats aged well.
>>9013122
Do i have to do a certain prompt with tensor to make it work?

>>9013140
If you're using wan 2.2, you just have to describe her taking her top off to reveal her giant breasts or something like that. You may have to trial and error like I did.

>>9013143
Does this work with anything animated like cartoons or does it only work with semi realistic stuff, sort of new to all of this

>>9013153
For grok and seemingly sora, animated images seem to work well. For wan and other older chinese generators, it makes animated images sort of choppy or janky like vidrel.

>>9013156
That's pretty hilarious, I have to say.

Do still find it quite absurd that this is possible at all.

Like I can literally grab a random screenshot of the Flintstones and tell my computer "have these two women strip down and start making out," and bam, two minutes later I've got a snippet of the secret episode where Wilma Flintstone and Betty Rubble gave in to their lesbian lust.

It's even more impossible than planes flying.

>>9013503
So far my attempts don't even respect the initial picture.

>>9013517
Hm, I haven't really had an issue with that myself. Most recently been using the aforementioned smooth mix i2v at https://civitai.com/models/1995784?modelVersionId=2260110 with the workflow suggested by its creator, at https://civitai.com/models/1847730?modelVersionId=2264611

Lightly adjusted, bumped cfg up to 1.4 right now, dropped the upscale factor down to 1.5, and I disabled a few nodes that don't seem to be doing anything helpful (video preview in the lower left, automatic saving of last frame), but it's been decent.

here's my grok vids. using free grok app

>>9013528
more free grok

another grok

>>9013528
I thought grok just didn't allow anything sexual, it doesn't even assist me on writing content, not even to generate embeddings.

Grok does seem quite potent for this. (And I am similarly amazed/incredulous that any major, reputable-ish company is willing to offer such a service) Just, man, I would not be comfortable sending the required requests out to the panopticon like that.

>>9013531
so I'll just tell you what I'm doing and what I have,
I have the Android app. the age is set to 30 ( important to see your age as older than 18)

when creating there are 2 ways, writing a prompt or adding an image .
if you're writing the prompt from scratch you gotta pick "SPICY" on the video settings. spicy is what allows for nudity or sex.

if you're adding a picture, the spicy option doesn't exist. but it says custom.

if you're having trouble either you didn't authorize your email or confirm your email account.
you didn't set your age properly, or you weren't choosing spicy
and I don't even know how to properly prompt. I still don't know how to do good prompting for sex.

before fixing the age and choosing spicy it wasn't allowing me to work

>>9013535
I feel like as long as it's nothing questionable or even illegal it's fine. no one will care if you have having wonder woman giving a blowjob.

>>9013311
Very nice! Can you do a front view where she is showing her tits please?

>>9013311
Very nice! Can you do a front view where she is showing off her tits please?

>>9013528
I hope there's just a image limit per day and not that I ran out of free uses cuz I'm debating if I'll pay 30 bucks for a months worth of experimenting.

Also, do you know how to d/l the vids from Grok without the sound?

>>9013143
I've seen through trial and error through my attempts to get some titties, but I dont think it's worth it anymore.

>>9013644
If you give a mouse a cookie...

I've noticed that (again, at least the one I'm using) does have trouble drawing vaginas that are not in frame in the original picture, they either look really wrong or, in this case, don't really exist.

>>9013541
>I feel like as long as it's nothing questionable or even illegal it's fine. no one will care if you have having wonder woman giving a blowjob.
Yeah, I just have a somewhat overdeveloped sense of privacy/shame.

>>9014052
That's pretty good! Thanks!

>>9013911
Have her take off the bra to show the goods

>>9014223
She better blow him soon

>>9014231
>She better blow him soon
Just structurally speaking, that seems unlikely. One of the difficulties with fantasies of absurd anatomy. You see the 3D animations where they try to depict it anyway, they have to get ridiculous/disturbing distension of the mouth to try to avoid clipping.

>>9014244
Crap. Either way thats a nice grind from tink

>Error: Audio streams are not allowed.
then just fucking mute it ffs

>>9014271
Thats what I'VE been complaining about, lol.

>>9014244
Hopefully it can be improved later to do blowjobs

>>9014418
The technology itself? It can, especially when given additional guidance with a lora. I was speaking of the reality into which we were glimpsing with that particular video, in which it seems like it would be quite impractical. Not sure what would happen if I tried to tell it to show a blowjob there.

Though loras can have their own problems, we can see here the robot has halfway developed nipples by the end of the clip, and her breasts are jiggly in the manner of flesh. I also had to run the generation a number of times before it avoided instantly popping pupils into existence.

Can stitch more than one together, but...definite downsides, the transition is noticeable if you look closely, and I think I can already see the quality degradation people have talked about just with two in a row.

>>9014547
Try deleting the frame or two where it transitions.

>>9014271
Very annoying for the new hotness that is grok videos since you can't seem to turn off the sound gens. I use https://ezgif.com/mute-video for a quick mute but I'm sure there's faster offline options.

>>9014396
Mmmm, nice chassis.

OK, so I want to have the bug to grow a tentacle/proboscis to slide inside the woman's panties... I just can't find a way to do it, if someone does it please share the results (I assume the metadata, prompt etc., would be saved with the video.

>>9014555
Make her pull off her outfit please, i want to see those boobs out in the open.

>>9014754
Here's what my wan does. Personally I don't really see the appeal of such inhumanly large breasts, but I guess they're popular enough, middle half of the thread here has been full of them.

>>9014933
Why does that loop decently

>>9014941
Arms coincidentally ended up in a similar position. Head didn't move much throughout. Although some would say that it's a rather indecent loop, ho ho.

I've been playing around with grok for the last two days. Mostly animating cartoons and old dalles. The ability to add voice and other sounds is pretty cool. Sadly /aco/ does not support sound, so I have to post over in the shithole that is /gif/.

One for robotfuckers. Anatomy behind the pair is incoherent, but that's the fault of the original image, it never made sense back there. Motion lines in the original image unsurprisingly don't seem to translate well when we have actual motion. The liquid effect at 'point of contact'...is okay for the first second or two, but then rapidly breaks down, becomes these weird upward squirts, maybe the particular checkpoint I'm using was trained heavily on ejaculations and it's influencing all other appearances of liquid. I've also noticed that when I ask for drool or saliva, it often comes out with thick white drops.

>>9014966
Attempt at animating an erenisch pic. Kind of annoying to have to manually remove the sound.

>>9014966
Been doing the same til the image limit reaches.
Thought I was done til I realized I could still animate the same renders I a already made.

Been having a ball making pixar milfs and gilfs.


Curious though, if I just keep rerolling the prompt, would the animation get more accurate?

So is hailuo free again or not? i got an ad saying it's free again but then i logged in and still have 0 credits

>>9014933
Im just a titty man, a big preference of mine thanks

Beware that this one is so scandalously explicit I hesitate even to post it.

>>9015095
HARLOT

>>9014933
Dennafag here. Thanks for gen lol

>>9015027
Maybe only a certain feature is free. I think I remember at one point start-to-end video gen was being offered for free.

>>9015163
DEANNA, FUCK

Huh, this turned out better than I expected, first try. Don't look too closely at the figures in the back, though. Also all the eyes are a bit wonky.

>>9015026
>Curious though, if I just keep rerolling the prompt, would the animation get more accurate?
Probably not as any kind of general trend, but if you roll the dice a bunch of times you're obviously more likely to get a result you like somewhere amongst the set.

>>9014607
Yeah, I doubt it would be able to do something like that without a lora, that's a pretty specific and unusual request.

>NSFW accessibility in Grok guide

1. Download Grok on your phone or an android emulator (you can delete it when you're done if you prefer browser)
2. Log in with preferred account.
3. On the home screen, touch the 3 lines on the top left corner
4. Go to settings at the bottom of the screen.
5. Click your avatar.
6. Set your "Birth Date" so that it makes you at least 18 (the year 2000 is easy to remember)
7. Make sure to save at the top right corner of the screen.

This SHOULD be enough to make more NSFW img2vid pics go through. Don't forget to use https://ezgif.com/mute-video/ or a video editing program to remove the audio before posting here. Otherwise, you can use catbox to post links if you're too lazy to do that lel

>>9015172
I'm amused by the fact that it's oscillating through a few hallucinated source websites there in the upper left, before apparently settling on Jemstone something.com. At least I assume that's completely hallucinated, nothing relevant immediately turns up on a casual search.

>>9015178
Ah, the lora I used for the base image was for having large bras and I think the guy who made it used a tit site like divinebreasts or scoreland or whatever.
https://civitai.com/models/414525/big-bras-for-pony

I'm gonna try again with a different titfuck lora. Anyone have a decent prompt to actually have her move her tits?

>>9015186
>Anyone have a decent prompt to actually have her move her tits?
I actually tried a bit with that one earlier, but couldn't get anything satisfying.

Might as well spam here after /g/ and /gif/.
So is SDXL still the best model to do this?
I am trying to make Wan 2.2 porn videos based on photorealistic NSFW images of fictional characters in different sex positions. There are loras for different positions and acts for Wan 2.2, but as I understand they need the reference image to be in that position already for good results.
So I need to make a good base image for i2v using character LORAs.
Flux can do this but I can't find a way to consistently get rid of the "plastic" flux look which completely ruins it for me plus maybe I just suck at this but it seems worse at combining multiple loras together (character + sex act etc.) than SDXL. Krea spinoff is better for realism but it lacks the LORA library and the compatibility with base flux LORAs is limited.
Flux LORAs can be converted to Chroma and it doesn't need any sex position LORAs as it knows NSFW out of the box but it needs a lot of luck with limbs as Chroma is too schizo until someone makes a finetune with decent anatomy. Hopefully in the future but doesn't seem to be an option now.
Qwen seems promising but there is currently little to no character and NSFW LORAs?
The realism mixes of Pony/Illustrious aren't good for this because they don't have the a lot of the specific "character" loras I am looking for, if you know what I mean.
So this leaves me with good old SDXL?
I haven't really used non-booru finetune SDXL for more than a year so I am a bit lost as to what current meta is.
I am following 1girl rentry in the /ldg/ /g/ OP and downloaded Lustify. Didn't really have too great results though. (Bad hands plus not replicating the character accurately enough, though I haven't tested too much) Maybe I just don't remember prompting meta, parameters or whatever for base SDXL too well.
Regardless does anyone here have any checkpoint and other recommendations for this task?

>>9015215
>they don't have the a lot of the specific "character" loras I am looking for, if you know what I mean
I do not

>>9015169
Thanks

>>9015216
I am using the word character in a very loose sense. I can't tell more because saying it out loud would defeat the purpose.
That's not the key issue here though. Just know that I am looking for a SDXL checkpoint rather than pony or illustrious, for some reason.

>>9015232
Have you tried the SDXL loras with the Illustrious/Pony checkpoints? They sometimes work

>>9015249
At times yeah but the compatibility tends to be low.
If I end up being reaching that degree of desperation, I would probably start training my own loras for whichever pony/illustrious realism mix I settle on.

>>9015255
Have you tried genning with your base SDXL checkpoint and then using a realistic checkpoint you like as a refiner?

>>9015267
The refiner also needs to know the character with a lora so this is just an extra step that might increase image quality but not really address the core question.

>>9015232
>I am using the word character in a very loose sense. I can't tell more because saying it out loud would defeat the purpose.
Genuinely not sure what you're implying, and curious about it. Are you trying to replicate a celebrity or something?

Whoops, attached the source image instead of the video.

>>9015311
Yes that's exactly it.
I now realize how corny and stupid all of this comes off as.
My bad.

>>9015169
What kind of lora?

>>9015334
>What kind of lora?
One that probably doesn't exist. You can check what's out there for wan 2.2 i2v loras on civitai; for the most part they're relatively conventional. The base model isn't great itself at sex or bringing in genitals that weren't in the original image, so I think the basics are going to be people's main focus for a while. (Though there are some oddities as well)

>>9015330
>Yes that's exactly it.
>I now realize how corny and stupid all of this comes off as.
>My bad.
Hah, no worries. Don't think replicating celebrities is too big a deal for people around here, though I understand it can be elsewhere.

>>9015358
So I could try to alter the picture make a frame with a tendril or something? or is it just something that doesn't work? there are "interactions" with dicks in this thread but I never understand the limitations of the models.

>>9015359
I'm not an expert myself, but no, that wouldn't really help if the model is entirely unaccustomed to - was not trained on - video with elements similar to that you're talking about. It can only replicate things similar to what it's "seen" and had tagged for it - though it can certainly combine those things in novel ways.

As for what's in the thread, I and I assume everyone else are using loras and/or 'merged checkpoints' which have indeed been trained on this kind of sexual content to make them able to represent it with some degree of fidelity. When I first started with wan I tried to make a blowjob video, and even with a very suitable starting image, the result was nothing even remotely recognizable using the base model wan.

But gimmie a minute, just for curiosity's sake if nothing else I'll try to give it that image and that kind of description, and we'll see what pops out.

>>9015383
>>9015359
>>9014607
Actually not too bad, it may have some familiarity with tentacle at least. (I used that term instead of proboscis, which seemed like it would be more of a stretch.)

>>9015389
Nice, it didn't quite slide it inside her panties but maybe creating a last frame is good enough, could I get the full workflow and stuff if I drag and drop that video on my comfyui?

Oh, and metadata is stripped here I believe, but I'm using the loadout I talked about in >>9013527 (have customized the workflow a bit more now, but nothing terribly important), and the prompt was

We see a huge insect on top of and holding a woman. The woman is wearing a white bra and panties, and is struggling to escape. The insect grows a tentacle from the bottom of its body, and the tentacle slides inside the woman's panties.

It's hard to be completely sure, but it seems like literalism and direct reference with simple sentences is generally the recommended/successful approach.

I don't actually have that many genuinely explicit images saved to use as fodder for this. But for some reason I have a folder with a number of harry potter ones.

>>9013734
there's a 24 hour limit. it resets.

I used imgur to remove sound. it's easy

>>9014052
I would be much more worried about posting on 4chan lol. with all the pedo shit, bestiality, and revenge porn and the celeb nudes and everything else questionable that gets posted in this site lol.
obviously no one here does those pics, but we are under the same roof.
( plus 4chan is monitored by different agencies)

>>9014271
>>9014555
imgur also removes sound.

>>9014966
what thread?

>>9015095
she's naughty

>>9015389
Well, I went on and generated some anime style frames, I would have to actually recreate the picture using some 3D or something to separate the parts if I want something better looking than the original poster.

Hah, jesus. The relative scale of this one is not quite what I had in mind, but I think it's about what the guys who do those 'cum tributes' are hoping for.

>>9015541
>what thread?
The ai video general on /gif/ is called /vdg/. It's a relatively fast thread, there are like two per day.

>>9015172
>https://ezgif.com/mute-video/
Thanks for the tip. That's easier then the local program I use for webm editing.

>>9015738
>>9015172
ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -an -c:v copy out.mp4

"-an" means no audio and "-c:v copy" means just copy the video stream. There's no copy-of-a-copy issues, it just strips the audio almost instantaneously.

Grok's filter is very strange. Its less censored mobile and it is also dependent on the image you put in? Here is an example. I uploaded both of these images and if I use the prompt "The tribal women take their tops off", one image will accept the prompt 10 out of 10 times, but the other refuses to go through. The one that refuses the prompt will also generate videos that avoid showing nipples while the other will show nipples even if unprompted.

https://litter.catbox.moe/d5oxfek82x93xk4n.png
https://litter.catbox.moe/t7lessosnti3z98o.png

Problem: Screenshots from television and movies are generally too far away, content-wise, from overt sexual activity to transition there sensibly over the course of six seconds.

Solution: Magic!

lol

Whoever on here recommended Whisk is a GOAT. It is way better than nanobanana in some respects

>>9015806
That's pretty good quality. What checkpoint/loras?

kinda related to a thread full of .mp4s
Does 4chan run really REALLY slow for anyone else lately taking forever to load webms and mp4s? makes browsing a thread like this a pain.

Does anyone know how to use Whisk?
For example, I have two characters on the left where I've made changes such as changing their poses. The consistency is fine, but if I tell it to put them together, it completely changes the style to a generic one.

>>9016693
Not I, not in general anyway. Once in a great while I've had issues, but I think it's my ISP when that happens.

>>9016589
This is just WAN I2V with the deepthroat lora (and lightining, and Insta Girls). Image original is https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=7652796&tags=calm_%28artist%29+

>>9016693
4chan sometimes has downtimes where it loads super slow. But that's always been the case for me.

Do you guys need 128GB of RAM or is 64GB enough? i'm on 32GB now it's locking up with certain loras.