And I don't mean poor in a "she's just starting her career" kind of way, i mean she and her family have less that £500 to their name at any given time.
I am a bit older than her and run a budding martial arts dojo as well as working full time as a software engineer. I own the property we live in, and have plenty after mortgage and bills to spare at the end of the month. She works independently as a nail technician and earns below the taxable amount of income. Her estranged father and stepfather live abroad, and her mother lives in the UK in rented accommodation. There are no assets whatsoever forthcoming from the inheritance front, whereas I have my parents' half a million pound house and boat set to go to me as an only child.

I can't get it out of my head that I'm choosing to have a difficult life with this woman. Many women that I knew from university now work at banks, my peers are with well earning women that come from wealthy families, and I feel like I'm going to miss out. On top of this, I stand to lose a lot more in a separation in the future.

Meeting girls was difficult for a while as I work mostly from home, but since I started the martial arts club I have a number of eligible female students that work as vets / teachers etc, and I can't help but think that life would be easier with them.

What should I do /adv/?

>>33198536 (OP)
>hot
>depends on you

>>33198536 (OP)
If you really truly love her past her looks aside, stay with her.

>>33198536 (OP)
don't do it bro
grass is always greener on the other side until you go there and see yours looked green from there too
we all want and wish something different for our lives but you have to ask if it's worth the risk to leave a good thing you have for something you don't even know if you can achieve
sadly that's the main reason most people cheat to end relationships, as much as I hate to admit it, they go from something sure and safe to another sure and safe thing without touching the uncertain.
Anyways I had a gf that i considered to have many flaws compared to my more succesful classmates and aquaintances. Left her when the doubts became too strong and I thought one of my classmates was flirting with me. That wasn't the case and none of them paid attention to me after I broke up, they just liked seeing if their attractiveness was strong enough to make me broke up with my gf to try something with them, and it was and I was a fool
I was lucky I found another loving gf shortly after in a completely different place, but I learned an important lesson in knowing when I have a good thing even if it's not perfect.

>>33198536 (OP)
>I wish instead of my hot young wife who depends on me and is grateful to me for it I was with some high-powered career-obsessed roastie who will leave me for her boss the minute she starts outearning me and will not respect me
YOU. FUCKING. NUMBSKULL.
I hope something goes wrong in your next demonstration at the dojo and you end up hitting your head and becoming retarded, because very fucking clearly that brain is going to waste.
But what am I saying , you're a SWE. You'e the type of person who is the antithesis to the non-NPC rational free thinker.

>>33198536 (OP)
This is so all retarded, I have no advice. But it would be very fitting to ask that on reddit and I'm sure you would get lot's of replies.

>>33198536 (OP)
>I can't get it out of my head that I'm choosing to have a difficult life with this woman.

She's poor for a reason anon. She will without question drag you down. Her hotness is how her bloodline has survived. By luring in people.

>>33198536 (OP)
It goes to show looks aren't everything. "Beauty fades but wealth accrues interest." In the long run it is in your best interests to be with an ambitious woman who comes from a good family with money. As time goes on you don't want to get trapped into having to support her deadbeat family members. A "nail technician", kek, she's not even trying to better herself either. She probably doesn't take care of her body either, so the wall will hit her hard and fast, she won't even be hot anymore in a few years.
Get in a relationship with someone who is on your level. Staying with a hot loser gf is shallow combined with naive.

It's fucked up that in modern times, women also need to make money.

>>33198536 (OP)
Damn, upper middle class people are truly scum, they don’t even see any other class of people as human. That’s crazy

>>33202698
This whole thread is wild

>>33198536 (OP)
>I own the property we live in, and have plenty after mortgage and bills to spare at the end of the month.
You selfish SOB. You don't even have a problem to solve. If you dump her for some middle class career woman you are going to get fucked in the ass by karma.

>>33202698
thing is most poor people are actually subhuman
not in the sense they use around here but actually had a subpar experience as humans, never got to experience what makes a human one, never travelled, never received a complete education, sometimes even didn't receive a correct nutrition growing up, they keep backwards beliefs alive and are anything but what you picture a human of the 21st century to look lke. We need them to sustain the system because that's how it works for now but they are subhuman for sure.
No matter the race or country everywhere I went to poor people behave more akin to animals than humans, any negative stereotype you have of people from any country, it's always poor people.

>>33203174
Today's broadcast from the ivory tower, your presenter was Mr.Faggot. Thank you Mr.Faggot!

>>33204864
but nothing I said was a lie.

>>33205089
Yes it is. It is vague. Name one 'backwards belief'. Also I can refute your arguments one by one. I will start by saying that even the highest nobility traditionally doesn't know shit about nutrition and health. For proof I cite the book 'Aus verklungenen Zeiten' by Paula von Bülow. She describes her noble entourage as constantly overeating and not doing any exercise, then when they get sick they blame 'levirus'. Interdasting huh? Even Bismarck himself, her personal friend, is quoted to blame his sicknesses on 'le virus'. Totally it is not overeating. Even the great prussian general blames not himself but tinyjews to be his illness'cause. So infact rich people are not more educated, neither more intelligent, nor have more proper manners than poors. Which of your worthless arguments shall I refute next?

>>33205128
you're funny because you're naming backward beliefs of people in the past, when the peasants have even more backward beliefs as a refute to something I said is currently happening
so the whole post is moot

>>33205181
It is not. I also know rich people personally and they still hold the same believes. In contrast to what is sometimes propagated rich people just until recently have been dumb fuckers who preferred the pesticide veggies and harboured resentment for anything organic because it seemed 'a hippie fad' to them and their lazy asses actually had to wash them before eating. Zhey aren't any different from say construction workers laughing about 'faggy food'. I merely named the book because if I had talked of my personal experience you would be justified to accuse me of making it all up.
Yet you still haven't made more precise any of your accusations, because you know you will get ripped apart. The broader context -you have to understand- is that rich people are rich not because of merit, but because when european people still lived in tribalistic societies, some Judases sold out their neighbours to the funny merchants from Venice and their militias, in exchange for wealth and power. The root of your wealth is betrayal. Fuck you faggot. You are someone born with a golden spoon, yet you are unhappy. And instead of admitting to yourself that you are a miserable woman, you rationalize everyone else in 'not even being human'. Thus framing your own failure at enjoying your existence into the poor's failure in some women logic way. Just as you rationalize wealth into being the fruit of virtue when it is the fruit of cowardice, betrayal and godlessness.

>>33205222
a person who is the best at cleaning toilets is one prepared for a long time to do so, not because of any virtue but because he developed skills and received education pertaining to that task
the same way the best way to lead a city or a country is people educated and given skills to do since they are born, instead of giving it to someone ill equiped to do so.
simple as.

>>33205264
Got you! In your initial post you claimed rich people to be inherently more virtuous than 'poor subhumans', now you are detouring to 'lol rich people are just better at handling money and that's all'. Anyways good nighty to you

>>33203174
>had a subpar experience as humans, never got to experience what makes a human one,
Which are?
>never travelled,
What is economic migration?
>never received a complete education,
Over-education (in the schooling sense) dims wit
>sometimes even didn't receive a correct nutrition growing up,
Biologically not that big of a factor, rather it's the surrounding factors correlating eg severe neglect or shit upbringing or family
>they keep backwards beliefs alive
Like?
>and are anything but what you picture a human of the 21st century to look lke.
Tiktok doomscroll app addled retards? Kek
>We need them to sustain the system because that's how it works for now
Well yeah, where the fuck are you gonna get your plumbing and electricity and food and shit? People! Some of them will be poor and hence choose to work to stay alive!
>No matter the race or country everywhere I went to poor people behave more akin to animals than humans,
Definitely wrong, poor people in different countries are vastly different, third world vs first world Poor's are completely different species, the latter probably drug addicted welfare scrounges
>any negative stereotype you have of people from any country, it's always poor people
Not necessarily. Plenty of tropes mocking rich people

>>33202698
No reason why they should

>>33198536 (OP)
demote your hot gf to side-piece and start vetting middle(or better) class women til you find a suitable wife
I have faith in you anon

>>33198536 (OP)
There are a few simple questions to resolve your dilemma. Do you want kids, and would she make a good mother?

If the answer to both are yes, her financial situation and career aspirations are irrelevant. Unless she is borderline retarded, marry her and put a few babies in her. If you do want kids but she would not be a good mother, break up with her immediately. You mentioned you are older so you shouldn't be wasting time.

If you don't want kids, just stay with her until you get bored. Don't marry her. Nothing really matters if you aren't trying to start a family, just have whatever fun you can.

>>33198536 (OP)
You could try to teach her to earn money remotely from home or something, plenty of shit like that these days

>>33198536 (OP)

If mingling with poor people bothers you so much don't do it. But when you break things off with her have the human decency to be honest and tell her that the reason you're breaking things off with her is because she's poor. She'll definitely hate you for it, but at least you'll be making it much easier for her to move on.

Her life sounds hard enough as it is, no need to make it any harder.

>>33205264
We should kill all of the poor people. Then there will be nothing but rich people and the world will be perfect!

>>33198723
>my hot young wife who depends on me and is grateful to me for it
Incel moment. Women do not experience gratitude, full stop. She will feel entitled to his money and if he withholds it, she will get nasty in that special way that only women can. What OP will experience with a woman from a poor background with parents who had bad money management habits and passed those habits down to her is a person who will likely NEVER be able to contribute financially in any meaningful way. More than that, she will actively drain OP's resources with her shitty upbringing and habits.

>>33198536 (OP)
One of the more important life lessons when it comes to relationships is that in most ways, people will turn out like their parents. Are her parents poor but sensible people, or are they poor because they're idiots who frivolously waste their money? If the latter, you can fully expect your girl to act the exact same way.

>>33209383
if everyone has a million dollars, then a million dollars is no longer worth a million dollars

>>33198536 (OP)
I say don't marry her, and always date the person you think you love most.

>>33209536

In that case, we should exterminate the entire human race until only the person with the most money is left alive because poor = bad.

>>33198536 (OP)
Honestly if she’s attractive and you’re compatible otherwise I’d treasure her as gold. Most women aren’t money motivated and the “career women” come with a truckload of personality issues. Plus they’ll lose their careers when they’re pregnant anyway, 9 times out of 10. Ultimately do what your gut is telling you, but personally, I don’t care that much how much money a girl makes. Attractive, supportive, similar goals and values is what matters to me.

you took the initial comment (by the way the replies have devolved I think you're replying to my initial comment) and took it to the extreme
I was talking about poor people, middle class people are for the most part ok, of course rich people correctly educated are kinda preferrable (as with anything spoiled people of any social class are unbearable but the more money you have the more unbearable you become), poor people behave like animals.
They are subhuman, middle class people can earn the lottery and blend with the rich people ok with some practice and time, poor people will always look like the beverly hillbillies when they strike gold, see all the rappers.

>>33202698
You don't get it. Rich people don't look down on poor people for merely shallow superficial reasons. Poor people generally are annoying, dumb, unpleasant, and they make idiotic decisions, and are a danger to themselves and the people around them. They don't act human, why should we see them as human?
Your response is like that of a BPDdemon. "Omg you're so mean!" No empathy for the other, no self-reflection for why someone might want to draw boundaries with annoying harmful people.

>>33198536 (OP)
take a page from the ladies book. Dig that gold sis.

>>33211986
>. Poor people generally are annoying, dumb, unpleasant, and they make idiotic decisions,
so are rich people. They have to pay people to be nice to them.
> and are a danger to themselves and the people around them. T
yeah thats true.
> hey don't act human
Neither do the rich.
I like the middle class. People who had to learn life tend to be more grounded.
> No empathy for the other, no self-reflection for why someone might want to draw boundaries with annoying harmful people.
Thats exactly how I feel about rich people

>>33212037
>I like the class I belong to

>>33198536 (OP)
anon...why would you leave your gf over financial stuff? if you're truly in love, you wouldn't do that. look into your heart and you'll have your answer. if you're truly in love and can see a long term relationship together, money will NOT matter to you.