Should a girl's past matter to you in a relationship?

God, I hate roasties so fucking much.

>>33389871 (OP)
>Should a girl's past matter to you in a relationship?

Yes. Because it can show you whether or not they will repeat shit behaviours with you.

>>33389871 (OP)
she is right that sharing that you are thinking of other men having fucked your girlfriend is embarrassing cuck shit men used to know not to being up before zoom zooms

>>33389894
Yeah but her friend, the boy's mother, is a bitch. Her son confided in her mother. Her mother decided to gossip about her own son to a blue checkmark social parasite. Now that social parasite is lambasting a young guy over social media for clout.

If the mother is in shock that her son is acting like a bitch, maybe the mother should remember who raised him. It was her who did, the woman.

Overbearing women do this shit all the time. They raise their sons to be bitch-made, they undermine discipline, undermine the father role, and then they wonder why their sons end up fucked in the head.

So they blame men instead of themselves lol Typical shit. I bet if you were to confront the lady's son about his BS, he'll blame everything but himself too. Like mother like son.

>>33389871 (OP)
>Should a girl's past matter to you in a relationship?
If you mean the fact that you're not her "first" then no, that shouldn't matter in the slightest. If her past involved murdering people then that matters.

>>33389871 (OP)
Yes but not taken to an extreme where it just becomes unrealistic and immature, and not in a way that gets you personally bent out of shape and feeling insecure. It matters because your past is the best predictor of future behavior, and it shows you something about their values. If you view sex as a private, important and intimate thing, but their past indicates they separate sex from emotion, then that can point to an incompatibility in values and perspectives on something that's important in a relationship. Being 30 and expecting someone you find to be a virgin is an example of the aforementioned unrealistic and immature extreme. Being someone who doesn't do hookups, wouldn't if they could, and wanting someone who is similarly inclined, that's reasonable, and it's better that you find someone like that than settle for someone you're not compatible with. Similarly, if they had a history of cheating, that indicates poor character and values, so it's understandable to avoid them.

>>33389871 (OP)
No

Mark Gungor said it best "Wait Until Marriage"

>>33389871 (OP)
Bait thread, but obviously, yes. People are the sum of their actions.

>>33390017
>Being 30 and expecting someone you find to be a virgin is an example of the aforementioned unrealistic and immature extreme.
Not necessarily. Having a consistent moral standard, even when it's exceedingly likely to be met as time goes on, isn't extreme in any meaningful sense, and as long as you don't act entitled to having it met (that is, you're comfortable with the greater risk of staying single, and don't blame others for it), it isn't unrealistic, either.
Also, what you expect is an entirely separate thing from how you treat someone who isn't that. Treating people who aren't your imagined ideal like they've personally insulted you for being themselves is obviously a problem, no matter how reasonable that ideal is.

>>33389871 (OP)
To a point. You use knowledge of the past to inform the present and future. You should look for red flags, but not being a virgin isn't a death sentence

>>33390111
It's unrealistic in that it's increasingly unlikely you'll find a normal, sane woman that is a virgin by the time you're 30. Outside of deeply religious women, which if that's your thing then you know where to look, most people are going to have had several long term relationships and have slept with a few people by then. Many who haven't and who aren't doing so for religious reasons will have significant issues, trauma, or are themselves very picky in whi they consider a partner. If that is the standard you have, and like you mentioned you're willing to remain single rather than compromise on your values, then it's your cross to bear, but it's only going to get harder to find someone who meets it the older you get. It's also worth self-criticizing and being skeptical of yourself as to why that's your standard; maybe not everyone who holds it, but many would say that's their standard out of personal insecurity or unjustified judgement of others rather than from a place of genuine values. Ultimately you can have whatever standard you want, just like women can have the standard of 6 foot, 6 figure, 6 inches, just don't become bitter about being alone when what restricts you is yourself.

>>33389871 (OP)
>Culturally manufactured neurosis from the online manosphere
Men in the past used to proudly parade bloody bedsheets around their community as proof that their bride was a virgin, if anything modern people still care way less than their grandfathers and their grandfather's fathers did.

I don't care as long as she doesn't have aids or other venereal shit I wouldn't wanna catch.

>>33389871 (OP)
This is honestly the right age to go through this and get it out of your system before you go out into the real world. If you can't handle your 16 year old GF having held hands with another guy before you I can't imagine you can handle it when your next GF tells you she fucked around on tinder until she got bored and met you lol.

It matters to some people. I would not expect a woman to accept that I have seen escorts in the past, so I keep it to myself