>>33415522
>women will have sex with men they aren't attracted to
I never said anything against that. We see sugar babies, prostitutes and acculturated prostitutes all day. Most women are the latter, wearing a mask throughout courting and *seemingly* switching up after she's gotten what she wants (marriage and a baby)
No. My problem is you seem to be arguing that operating rationally is *ALL* they ever do, which is not the case, hence the examples I gave. My problem is you argue in absolutes like
>EVERYTHING about female sexuality is deception
If you weren't so high on your own hubris, you'd realize, from the examples I gave, that your conclusions about my thought process wrong. I literally gave a situation where the woman *wasn't* attracted to the dude. Newsflash: a regular "ugly" dude with nothing in particular to offer can still fuck relatively attractive women.
>because you think they're magical fairy creatures who run on love and happiness
Not even worth a effortful response.
>>33415552
Great. Now account for race, marital status, physical fitness and income.