Anonymous
6/24/2025, 10:51:01 AM No.5005906
Does the existence of bears, especially the Panda, dispute evolutionary theory? The latter has allegedly eaten almost solely bamboo as long as we've known, with their earliest fossil goes back a million years. And yet while there's consequently a small difference in what is digestible to it, there is no radical difference in how it's digestive system functions, it's equivalent to lactase persistence or japanese seaweed gut germ. Similarly it's morphology is only slightly different from the other bears? Why has this guy hardly changed despite living in a radically different way? Even accounting for lack of predation on account of presumably being an apex predator in the past, would sexual selection not make a difference eventually? And other bears have similar , still-substantial (though less extreme) variations in their diet/lifestyle with little difference; the polar bear spends most of it's time near/in water and eats total meat, the grizzly is an oppurtunistic hybrid between a browser/predator and the sloth bear is an anteater wannabe.
Replies: