Does anyone else think it's retarded when people call pets "slaves"? 99% of pet cats and dogs for example aren't put to any intense labor that can be considered slavery, they eat, sleep, shit and get their required exercise before inevitably passing on, you could argue that they're prisoners if they're locked down to an area but that's about it.
Not talking about actual working animals btw, there's an actual argument there, I mean regular ass pets that do nothing.

super low ingroup preference high outgroup preference people will go as far as projecting abstract angst onto whatever "oppressed group" they are simping for at the minute, while totally ignoring that groups needs because their behavior didn't develop to actually help people anywhere. it developed to signal to other humans that they are caring, good, and trustworthy and just death spiraled from there like the development of peacock feathers.

>>5012495 (OP)
A man chooses, a slave obeys

>>5012495 (OP)
Many slaveowners also had a symbiotic relationship with their slaves.

>>5012495 (OP)
I don't think anyone normal does that unless they are looking for attention or trying to bait, usually for 'engagement' on their DOA content farm.

>>5012495 (OP)
Absolutely retarded. Even high obedience dogs have personality and independence. Incredibly obvious if you've ever been around or owned one of these dogs.

>>5012495 (OP)
I think of them more like eunuchs.

>>5012495 (OP)
If anything we are their slaves caring for them and feeding them. The only real "slave" animals are work ones like pack mules or plow oxen or whatever.

Even then those were all replaced with machinery.

Also anyone abusing a 1500lb bull is going to die, so it's not like actual slave animals will put up with shit.
>insert video of elephant trampling Indian who was whipping him
>insert video of Mexican whipping donkey, then the dinkey bites his leg and he screams like a girl