>>5013896It doesn't matter how people call or classify things.
Mr. Shapiro and colleagues promoted and made everyone believe they were making thing A (which got people excited because of the implications and future applications of their work), when in reality it's different thing B (which doesn't have the same implications and future applications), only because *technically* you could use semantics to call B the same name as A.
That's like saying your new medicine can cure all types of cancer in children, and it turns out that it can only cure 17-year-olds because technically they can be considered children too. Still cool but nowhere near what they led people to believe.
It's blatantly misleading in such an obvious way.