Starting next month if police wants to they can come knock on my door and take my devices because of fictional 3D animated loli I saw years ago. This is legit. "As long as it looks photorealistic" it will now be lumped in with real CSAM.
About a year ago, while I was browsing around 11pm a police truck rolled up outside my neighbours window. And I heard one of the people inside it say "Isn't it that guy sitting there?"
Then they drove off.
Just this week, the first case against AI generated CSAM was concluded. A guy who was just messing around and taking Subscription money to make Stable Diffusion lolis has to go to jail, not a suspended sentence, for 1.5 years, and then he has to work 200 hours of hard labor.

Looking at the comments I saw people cheering and everybody agreeing the time has come to behead all pedos.

I don't think I am one, but I saw dozens of 3D animated loli based on some vidya characters some years ago... so now I'm sad :(

Times are changing.

>oh nooooo, not my animated child porn. i NEED to good to loli porn, i NEED my cartoon cp

>>935716319
First the came for loli.
And you did not speak out
For you didn't care about loli.

Then they came for hentai.
And you did not speak out
For you didn't care about hentai.

Then they came for nudes posted without express permission.
And you did not speak out
For you didn't care about those nudes

Then they came for the porn creators.
And you did not speak out
For you didn't care about the porn makers.

Then they came for those who possessed porn.
And you did not speak out
For you didn't care as you viewed it online.

Then they came for you, for viewing porn of any kind.
And no one spoke out
For there was no to care about you.

Big if true.

Sovs?

>>935715461 (OP)
2D as well?

Only 2D matters.

>Starting next month if police wants to they can come knock on my door and take my devices because of fictional 3D animated loli I saw years ago. This is legit. "As long as it looks photorealistic"
That's true only if you live in demented countries like USA

>>935717563
very good, appreciated

>>935718156
>That's true only if you live in demented countries like USA
No. This is Denmark. It's going in effect July 1st.
>>935718098
Not 2D yet, but you get the feeling it's coming next.

>>935718390
Depressing.
I hope they go too far and we can finally murder every single politician and (((banker))).

>>935718390
>>That's true only if you live in demented countries like USA
>No. This is Denmark.
Please read again.

>>935718570
They're implementing Palantir, while raising the punishments for violence and sex crimes. Worst part about the CSAM change is that the definition is now so vague. I think it's "Other Forms of Art" so in cases I've heard about where a police officer visited a /b/ troll and inquired him about a 2D Loli, and was about to arrest him because it was "illegal", it ended up not happening because he realized it didn't fit.
But by the new definition, all you need to do is say "It looks like the proportions of a real human being, therefore it's abuse content" and it blatantly mentions "unicorn horns" and "dragon wings" as examples of having art that is fantastical but still counts as long as it looks "real enough".

We're moving into thought-crime now.

>>935715461 (OP)
>because of fictional 3D animated loli I saw years ago.
and how do they know this exactly...

>>935718390
What's the law exactly. U got a link?

>>935719138
>FBI buddy that is always watching you will snitch your internet history

>>935719710
it's an interesting point, but it still wouldn't prevent the upload of child porn.

>>935715461 (OP)
>Stop right there criminal scum, how dare you look at those fictional pixels and have a controversial thought.
>You're not hurting anyone you say? Well... I-I don't care, you had a thought I don't like!
>Enjoy rotting in prison scum!

This behaviour needs to stop. How come they're allowed to lock us up for having thoughts they don't like but not the other way around?

>>935715461 (OP)
if they come for the furries next i'm incredibly screwed

>>935717563
They're already trying to ban porn kek

>>935715461 (OP)
Nothing of value is being lost. Do you expect us to give a shit that you optionally scrolled loli and now your perversion is no longer legal or tp have sympathy about any of it? If so, fucking why?

>>935715461 (OP)
So why aren't you out protesting? Honestly someone should come along and just legalize all of it.

>>935717563
I love it, why are you worried about living in a world without pornography?

>>935721656
So basically, get ready for some government employee to come to your house with the intention of stealing your shit or even going through your entire house and going through your shit.

>>935718672
Good, anything resembling pedophilia including just drawing make-believe pictures that are exactly whats being represented and nothing of the shit you try to argue, plain and simple it represrnts kids, so stopping any of this in general can only be healthy for society. Degeneracy has gotten us to this point, ita time to return to our former selves.

>>935722314
>just get out there and admit youre a pedo to the world by protesting the ban of child like porn images.
Huge kek, doit

>>935722380
Youre not that interesting, they dont have the resources to pursue that, but this is effectively another scare campaign like the english arresting people for racist shit on facebook. Except we arent cucked about niggers here so fuck niggers but diddling kids is never ok and to defend this makes you a pedophile sympathizer. Which is in some ways worse because they, just like black people, didnt ask for your support and consideration.

>>935722381
And yet you support graphic violence, rape and murder in video games. If a person's mind can be so affected by fake images of children that they will harm real children than we should prevent fake images of violence to prevent real violence.

FYI I'm not in an way supporting pedophilia, I just don't like hypocrisy. On that same front, any argument for or against pedophilia is the same argument for or against gender transitioning children. To be consistent you must be for both or against both

Is it true that sherry uses a real face?

Doesn't the fact that she's a fictional person allow then to make animations of her?
Also xitter lolicons are arguing over whether or not it's okay to fap to Diana from the newest Crapcom game.

Thoughts? What about Sarah?
I wonder if animations Last of us would get you in trouble, Indiana legalised 3dcg loli? Last I checked there was a an article about it.

Some say a guy got a cease and desist for making Alice shit from Detroit become human, I wonder if it's because copyright or the face...This makes one wonder if /v/anons will get into issues for their obvious Eveline love.

And no this image isn't me trying to troll, I'm just reminding you guys what the xitter lolicon is like.

Why is 3dcg lolicon spreading? BA is coming to steam along with Black Souls and lolicons on xitter even like Diana... What is going on in this world? What will occur when the normies start liking the lolis?

The world really is shrouded in cunny.

Are 3dcg lolis legal? Will /v/ have their balls stolen? Or is people making rule34 with them considered character depictions?

Many questions, little answers!

KYS
No degeneracy

>>935722416
It's nothing to be ashamed of.

>>935717974
Where is this beautiful lolita from?

>>935722381
>>935722663
He doesn't want to admit that letting pedos have access to such materials reduces the chance of them actually hurting a child in real life. In fact, he will argue the opposite even though he has 0 evidence or proof to back it up other than "cause the mob and I said so"

You have to ask yourself at some point, if the material isn't hurting anyone in real life, and doesn't lead to someone being hurt in real life as a result, why is there such a push for it to be banned/stigmatized? It's either they want pedos to be the punching bags of society where they have an excuse to let all their sick and depraved behaviour out onto (killing/lynching people for example) under the guise of some misguided "justice" or some other shit, or they just don't like people having thoughts that they don't want them to, and at that point they're basically just the thought police. There's also the possibility they're insecure because they're actually attracted to children themselves, and don't want to be considered as "one of those filthy pedos" so their behaviour comes out in the form of this aggression. If you look at history it was very common for people to have "underage" gfs (even today they do in some places), this whole shit about the anti pedo movement is relatively recent. Now watch them argue "erm actually we're in the modern age and that was backwards so we changed it" like everything in the past was somehow a bad thing, and everything modern is good. It's like they're fucking brainwashed it's insane.

>>935722758
>degeneracy is what I define it to be
Just because you and a bunch of people got together and said "this is le bad" it doesn't mean it is, at least not compared to things that are objectively degenerate like scat and fucking animals.

Makes me think this world is inverted in a way. Only the hidden elite families or the ultra top 0.01% who cannot be named have access to actual paradise: which is fucking preteens and post-pubescent underages (not the babies or toddlers, that there is nothing that attracts me about). Whenever I look at a beautiful underage girl I just know I want to impregnate her. That's paradise. That's where heaven actually is. But because of this stupid system that's been fed a bunch of bullshit that we have to deal with the fact everyday that it's getting less and less likely for that idea to manifest in today's era.

Just one time. I want to own a goddamned 11-year-old who would be subservient to my every desire. I would fuck her brains out all night long and cuddle with her for eternity. I will never allow her to go out of my sight and I will always make her bend and warm.

>>935722321
It's you that you think they'll stop at porn and leave the ideas you like alone. Getting rid of the "wrongthink porn" is the foot in the door. Getting rid of all porn is the door wide open. And then when you object to them going full Thought Police they'll point to the open door. You welcomed them in with a smile on your face.

>>935723567
It's partly bc of the continued infantilization of all people, which includes pushing higher and higher "but they can't consent" laws which eventually will lead to classes of people who "can't consent" at any time and a while slippery slope. Pretending to be anti-exploitation is often in fact very pro-exploitation.

>>935723853
*It's cute that

>>935723567
Well there is an argument against mainstreaming it. Look at all the other degeneracies that are now accepted because the ((internet)) got people to think it was "normal" But I think you are right that a big part of it a "socially acceptable" hateful bigotry. People who would rather be bashing jews have an outlet. Also in many cases, drawn cp is found along with real cp. In the case mentioned by OP the guy was using real cp as the origin of his ai so its not like he was making art from his imagination. And of course there is pedophilia that is biologically normal but illegal (often called hemophilia) and pedophilia that isn't (with early prepubescent). There is much hypocrisy in the former where you have people saying a 16 year old is too young to understand the consequences of consensual sex with a 40 year old as if those consequences of sex are somehow different than the consequences of getting plowed by the entire high school (have some free condoms wink wink)

>>935724130
Damn autocorrect. hebo, hemo is something completely different

>>935723853
full thought police is already here. I'd rather them make porn illegal than allow them to add decades of jail time because you supposedly said nigger when shooting someone

OPs simple solution
>Do not possess any images

download a vpn
use incognito in browser(doesnt save cached images)
browse /b/ or any similar site
fap but no save
close tabs

rinse/repeat

so simple

>>935723567
>A sensible comment contrary to mob thought.
>No dogpile of screeching autists.
They said it was a myth yet there it is.

>>935724130
Pedos were mainstream to begin with. History already shows the results. That being the modern hysteria is just that. The only argument against it I can think of is that society no longer has close communities and religion that makes people behave themselves and keep an eye on each other. Relationships are not treated as a match between partners for life.

>>935728122
Male bonding used to be how ya grew up, there's no closeness anymore. It actually made the power dynamics worse not better to do away with it.

Please giv mig et link til et eller andet der viser der er noget bag dette. Tak.

Lige nu er det kun dit ord for det, er interesseret men skeptisk.

so anime next?

>>935717563
>Then they came for porn creators
Nah, the ZOGbots wouldn't do that to their masters.