>>935719395 (OP) I disagree. Removing the word nigger from common usage makes it much harder to indicate the difference betTRGGween them and those parts of the African-American community that are decent, hard working, and (relatively) law-abiding members of society as a whole.
>>935721878 The ratio (~5b/1w) and % left high school show that American blacks are more likely to not graduate from high school (this is because of lower mean IQ).
>>935722231 Black females tend to go to college and more recently our society has been working tirelessly to tear down glass ceilings but still a lot of work is needed
>>935722905 You have clearly never used AI before because Ai is far more convoluted in its delusions
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 7:08:03 PM No.935723746
>>935722905 Higher annual income at the same IQ level for black people can be explained by a course correction effort by CEOs regarding wage disparity. It does not fix every single systematic issue.
>>935719395 (OP) Nigger isn't a magic word you jew faggot pretending to be sensitive and "tolerant". Feel free to call me a racist Nazi cracker if you like. It really has no effect because I don't believe in magic words
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 7:32:12 PM No.935724442
>>935724207 YES; "As per the College Board, the Environmental Context Dashboard (including adversity scores) was first used in a pilot study of 50 schools 2018-2019, with expansion to 150 schools planned for Fall 2019 and a more widespread release in the following year." form: https://blog.prepscholar.com/sat-adversity-score
>>935724664 >Iq tests are racist This is just a baseless assertion; IQ tests are tested for and normed on (just like any other good test) both DIF (Differential item functioning) and factorial invariance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_item_functioning and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurement_invariance respectively. >>935724965 Another baseless claim
>>935724639 Musk is an obnoxious twit but his purchasing of twitter will always make me smile. All the fags like you sucking corporate's ass, "privately owned communal discussion spaces can be manipulated however the owner wants, if you don't like it build your own space" "Nooooooo he just bought our space, he can't doooo that"
>>935725675 >Science is inherently flawed Surely you have some methodology for coming to that conclusion; What do you disagree with in: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method#Elements_of_inquiry Are you a post-modernist?
>>935725940 How is the Whittaker family reunion going?
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 8:37:03 PM No.935726856
>>935725946 Yeah, if they ban it it will never end, they'll have to ban everything, and then we're just like the other boards lol, I'm happy with this rule, we can call each other out on stupid shit
>>935727217 >With this simple method i can prove god exists and is not real at the same time. If you're defining "GOD" as a real being (assuming that's what you mean by existent), then you contradicting that only serves as evidence against your "scientific method 2.0", this is due to the law of the excluded middle: --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_excluded_middle
>>935728124 >A real idea, yes Not real in any physical reality, no Even in thought nobody can conceive of a thing that both exists and doesn't (assuming "GOD" is a thing). >Now convince me god is not real I don't hold that position (but I do believe there is no evidence for any GOD(s)), nor do I want to convince you of it.
>>935727178 If the implementation of laws were not racially bias I would almost want the word to be criminalized. The trip to prison would look like a recreation of the trail of tears.