>>935859580 (OP)
I propose anew category. It's loli's but there is no sexual activity in the images and all the lolis look 2-9. It's just nude lolis looking cute. No gaping holes spread ecct. Just cuties looking sweet. I call em Nudies. They are nude cuties. Nudies.
If you rag on my idea I will reply toyour rude comment ahead of time "fuck off asswipe":
>>935859933
Yes. Nudies or Nothing is my motto. Bare bottoms are still Nudies as long as no sex. See I don;t want to do sex with a little Nudie. I just wan to adore them. The tease is better than the deed.
>>935860804
Lolis smell soooo fucking goooood in minecraft, it's just such an intoxicating smell. Makes me want to lose all my sanity. This is what life is all about, being with cute lolis.
>>935860804
I don't know about minecraft but I just love all the little sweetie pies out there. Never hurt a little sweetie. Never abduct one. Never scare one. Never expose yourself to one. never do se with one. Just love them and adore them. Seeing them happy and playing makes me happy and warms my heart. I love all the little sweeties.
>>935869804
nice bait, but i still vote left anyways even though it's the opposite of a supposed pedophilic interest. Welfare speaks louder, and I'm not a nigger
>>935870223
yeah, except most of them are hypocrites. It's lip service. The state of Utah has so many mormons where loli is banned and they're the biggest groomers of them all.
>>935870319
Tolerating pedophiles is consistent with a liberal/leftist worldview and inconsistent with a right-wing worldview. See someone like MrGirl who is a consistent liberal and supports tolerating pedophiles (although he still supports current age of consent laws).
>>935870534
Maybe that's because it can be treated with better mental health and support services? I don't think pro contact is acceptable, but I think someone should be afforded mental health services in a supportive environment. Labeling someone as deviant creates deviant behavior.
>>935870657 >I don't think pro contact is acceptable
How is having a community here where you post sexualized drawings of little girls and encourage that fantasy not pro contact?
>>935871108
How is circular reasoning where a cartoon is automatically pro-contact a valid defense? I've looked into this issue, and I know there's people who really are well intentioned and just need support. The community, to me, is more so a way to define what is and isn't acceptable. I agree with the decision in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition