Face matters to women, height matters to women, penis size matters to women. These matter to most women very much and they probably matter to all women to some degree

We took away their rights because this is all they'd select for if they had freedom, modern men have forgotten what the men of old knew. It's only a matter of time before it reverts back

Women will become obsolete within 2 years

>>935900169 (OP)
HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

YOU'VE NEVER HAD ANY PUSSY....

poor little videogame SISSYBOY
too stupid to figure out how to attract women with charisma

.... while even DOWN SYNDROME RETARDS and even stupid fucking NIGGERS can easily get pussy...

but not YOU

........how's your stupid videogame thing going, little boy?

>>935900169 (OP)
It's an endless cycle.
>very few males hogged all of the females in ancient times
>the rest of the males revolt
>strip females of rights and power using their physical strength
>females are forced to mate with lesser males
>more equal distribution of females to males
>males are motivated now
>society improves
>males forget why females had no power
>give females their rights back
>females only select for a small amount of males
>very few males hog all of the females
>repeat

>>935900270
now show the state of real androids

>>935900389
Niggers are the biggest virgins per capita.

>>935900389
Please stop. My retarded little brother uses this website and you're making him think he will be what you describe when he grows up. Thank you.

>>935900270
no they won't...
women rule the World, you stupid fucking idiot...

THEYRE the ones in control, as men will do ANYTHING to please them...

it's simply YOU who's obsolete. apparently, women have no use for you, whatsoever..

It's not like you "became" obsolete..
apparently, you've always been that way

That's exactly why you never wake up next to a woman in bed. That's exactly why you don't have any female friends that come hang out with you... women simply don't like you.

as far as women are concerned, you might as well be gay or in a coma, because either way, they're not interested

>>935900169 (OP)
>we
Shut up faggot, youve done literally nothing with your life.

>>935900470
YOU are the biggest virgin per capita

That's why ALL FOIR BILLION women on planet Earth would rather fuck a greasy stupid nigga than to be seen standing next to you

>>935900403

That's an interesting theory. You've had a lot of time on your hands to sit around thinking up stupid idiotic fabricated bullshit theories, huh?..

It's not like you had a hectic schedule with a girlfriend or anything

It's you, that stupid masturbation chair, and your idiotic theories...

>>935900528
>women rule the World
And how's that going?
>THEYRE the ones in control, as men will do ANYTHING to please them...
More men each day become demoralized and drop out of the system.
>women simply don't like you.
Yep which is why most men are becoming demoralized and right-wing

>>935900389
Holy projection, Batman!

>>935900586
>FOIR
k

>>935900389
>>935900528
>>935900586
>>935900637
You will never be a woman, tranny.

>>935900637
Actually, this is what historic records do suggest (there are some exceptions like vikings, bedouin, mongols and other raiding cultures), although it has never happened as simply as anon puts it. It's more like it is happening all the time at different stages in different places. But because of the internet, most humans are reaching towards an inevitable cultural singularity so it might actually become as simple as anon says. Not sure the sub-men could pull it off though given the state of security technology.

>>935900501
Does your name start with the T?

>>935900832
>Not sure the sub-men could pull it off though given the state of security technology.
If it keeps getting worse then most men will be sub-men, most men can beat all women and the men the women like, it's just numbers

>>935900887
Sure, why not.

>>935900169 (OP)

and while OF COURSE you've never had any pussy (absolutely none hahahaha) it's about much much more than just SEX...

it's about having a TRUSTED FRIEND
a team mate
a life companion
it's about having a female actually LIKE you....

it's about having a woman who LOVES YOU....

which you've Never experienced...
take it from me, dude
It's the most rewarding wonderful thing about being alive

having a woman who loves you
Who loves you so much...
That she's willing to invest her entire life into your life

who stands up for you, no matter what, even when she knows you're wrong

...... how's that little sissy boy video game working out for you, TODDLER?

>>935900887
If my name starts with a T, would you stop saying things that upset my little brother?

>>935900945
Lol didnt read

>>935901060
Yeah I'm just ignoring it too, eventually it will stop with the bait

>>935900779
I'm happily married and my kids are grown

I fucked almost 800 women in my life
(well over 700 by the time I was only 25 years old)

and according to every single woman on planet Earth

YWNBAM

You're not capable of it

in fact, in their eyes
YWABAW

JUST ONE OF THE GALS, AS FAR AS THEYRE CONCERNED

>>935900937
Yes but if security is automated, then it wouldn't be sub-men in that industry anymore. You've seen how they spend their money, they can't hold onto it. They won't be able to afford resources for war, they won't be in a position to infiltrate and change society from within, their communication is monitored and easily infiltrated, all they will have is numbers. Now, respect that I did say I am "not sure". Sub-men could still win a conflict like that but I'm considering what they have as opposition in the modern era which didn't exist in the past.

>>935900939
>>935900988
Which of you is my brother?

>>935901144
Me. Stop looking at the threads that upset you.

>>935901186
I just wanna die, man.

>>935900832
Your entire INCEL FAGSHOW has never been a product of history

It started with your creepy generation
And of course you'll try applying your special brand social and sexual impotence onto history books

But it's simply not true

YOU = The reason women don't like you

It has nothing to do with society or current trends...

It's just YOU

>>935901060
>read

You accidentally misspelled "ever learn how to attract a girlfriend"

>>935901096
bait?.... hahahaha

so THATS Your technique of pretending I didn't hit the nail directly on the head?

hoping other people will think you are cavalier, and my words are simply bait

AGAIN: YOU GET ZERO PUSSY
That's a fact, not bait hey like it you

Sweet on the outside, wild underneath... intrigued? emyzeth

>>935901355
Fuck off whore

>>935901216
Can we just talk in person?

>>935901216
Don't say that your brother cares mang

>>935901393
Don't bother, I know I am a lost cause

>>935900169 (OP)
you forgot to mention the most important thing to women
>>935900470
technically no, because niggers will fuck anything: black women, white women, each other (look up "on the downlow if you're not familiar with the term), younger, weaker prisoners (most go to jail or prison at some point), children, animals
it's one of the reasons that while the incidence of genital herpes is about 8% among American whites, it's around 40% among American blacks

>>935901126
reminder that this anon is a meth addict with an extensive criminal record
https://www.macon.com/news/local/article140196378.html

>>935901220
It did but it was covered up better. Such men would be sent to institutions which are remote, military or religious, where they could still rise to power and bring their cronies with them. It was mitigated but still would flare up similarly to what anon described like during British occupation of Ireland and India and I'm sure many other times which would be recorded with tact if at all. The only difference now is that they know what is happening and feel more wronged than perhaps ever before. Like a revelation, grand scale realization all at once, happening to ever sub-male exposed to the possibility.

What seems crazy to me, and I'd like to know if you agree, is that it doesn't have to be true, you know? It's narrative, it's whatever whoever believes that decides the pieces.

>>935901384
That is an automated bot.

>>935901521
Money matters differently than the other traits, money itself usually doesn't generate much actual attraction, it just allows women to live their lavish and materialistic lifestyles because of their susceptibility to advertisement. A tall, handsome, and big dicked guy will be desired for his genes, a rich guy will be desired for the money.

>>935901502
I'm coming up to talk, I'll bring some water because mom says you haven't been out of your room all day and are probably a little dehydrated and hungry. So we'll have lunch soon too.

>>935901758
>coming up
Wait, we aren't related then. You should still talk to your brother though.

>>935900169 (OP)
I’ve had sex, it matters but not as much as you think.

Be interesting, women want to be captivated, they want to be sold something interesting, if you’re not physically attractive do interesting shit. I can play 7 instruments and speak 3 languages and women are intrigued when I say I can do that shit

>>935900169 (OP)
>We took away their rights because this is all they'd select for if they had freedom
Anon, historically speaking most men didn't have much rights either. Both men and women had hard gender roles as well as class. Men and women evolved together to rely as a tribe together, and as much as women can be reduced to physical needs men can as well. No, you don't want some fat emotionally broken ugly bitch with no money who treats you like shit. It's the same with women.

Stop bitching about being a pathetic, undesirable man and either become desirable or learn how to love yourself instead of blaming people for having standards. Women having unrealistic standards is the same as men, men just tend to overrate physical attractiveness while women overrate everything and both of which are due to modern western society being materialistic and self worshipping

>>935901837
Thanks for your honesty, I was just going to say that because my brother was really confused haha. And same to you! Talk to your brother T.

>>935901861
>just have hobbies bro
Doesn't work

>>935901984
Does work, isn't enough.

>>935901980
Thanks, anon.

>>935901937
>Anon, historically speaking most men didn't have much rights either
Much more than women, I don't even know why you'd bring this up because it's a total non-sequitur

>No, you don't want some fat emotionally broken ugly bitch with no money who treats you like shit. It's the same with women.
I can already tell you're a woman, this is the typical woman response

>Stop bitching about being a pathetic, undesirable man
How about no, that's what the internet is for

>and either become desirable
Currently trying

>Women having unrealistic standards is the same as men, men just tend to overrate physical attractiveness
This is an untruth, men have much lower standards for being attractive

>>935902198
>I can already tell you're a woman, this is the typical woman response
I think it is important to say why this is a typical woman response. But also worth noting that we see it a lot in men now due to the normalization of single motherhood.
I'd marry a chubby or even fat broke woman who is emotionally scarred, but conditionally. Gotta exercise and change eating habits and we can do that together. Anyways, there are a lot of men and woman like this but the pressure to not do anything about it really is miserable.

>>935902344
>I think it is important to say why this is a typical woman response.
It's a typical women response because it's how they think, it's from one of two lines of thinking

Line 1: I am a woman, I get a lot of attention and have many options for suitors by just existing, therefore a man who doesn't have many/any options must be doing something wrong

Line 2: I am a woman, I find most men unattractive, therefore whenever a man is complaining about no gf, I will make up the worst imaginable woman possible and equate the two

>>935902646
And what I said is also important context, because it is a contrast of thinking.

>>935902198
>Much more than women
In most societies? No not really, women were far more protected than men in many cases. There's a soliloquy in Shakespeare's "The Taming of Shrew" that gets across traditional gender roles very well. Women might've not had as many legal rights as they were under the patriarch of the family legally, but they weren't exactly being sent out to battle either. Men and women had a shared responsibility to the family, the family was the central unit of all cultures. You talking about men and women as if they are deracinated from the concept of family is half of the problem with the modern west.
>can already tell you're a woman
Father of 2, actually.

>>935902344
>But also worth noting that we see it a lot in men now due to the normalization of single motherhood.
I'd marry a chubby or even fat broke woman who is emotionally scarred, but conditionally. Gotta exercise and change eating habits and we can do that together
That's both an extremely masculine and extremely feminine line of reasoning. Masculine because men always devalue themselves which inherently enables women shitty habits because "durr I can't do better" and feminine because of that gay motherly impulse you have about wanting to "fix" your partner. Men tend to undervalue themselves, women tend to overvalue. Men and women however all want a fantasy fulfilled through romantic love which is largely the same. You do want a better women deep down, you just lack the paternal instincts and self confidence to demand better.

Your issues are mostly emotional my dude,

>>935900389
STFU you stupid faggot cuck we all know you're a loser

>>935902831
>In most societies? No not really
Do I even respond after this?

>but they weren't exactly being sent out to battle either.
How does this contradict the statement that women historically had less rights than men? Only men could vote for most of American history and women couldn't have their own bank accounts until the 60s or some shit. Look at the Islamic world today. Men having responsibilities to the state doesn't mean that women had the same rights.

>Father of 2, actually.
Body pillows don't count

>>935902831
We don't all have the same issues, Anon. You have me right.
And I am just being a realist, I have been rejected across the board by men and women irl so I have developed low standards because that is what life offers me.
And it isn't just about fixing the partner, it's growth, it's security, I'm not very in shape anymore either. I have had over a decade to think about how I'd go about a relationship and the only chance I had was before I thought about any of it. haha

>>935902989
>How does this contradict the statement that women historically had less rights than men
Because what you define as "rights" didn't really exist in the ancient world and it's anachronistic to apply them as such. Slaves had no rights, peasants had no rights, serfs had no rights, plebs had barely any rights. In terms of men having more rights than women the difference was negligible for 95% of all people who ever existed and even for men there were men within the family who had more "rights" they did as the patriarch. Men and women had shared duties that revolved around the family, the family is more important than this gender war bullshit you fall into

>Body pillows don't count
Good, they're actually real biological children I am a father of

>>935903202
>And I am just being a realist
A defeatist, rejection is not a big deal and you making it so is an emotional issue. Your self worth comes from yourself, and you should not even seek a relationship if you're actively seeking codependency. You don't even need to be in shape, you need emotional maturity and catharsis. Exercise is just a tool to get there, not being in shape in itself unless you're idk trying to be a fireman or something.

>>935904358
Oh, that's what you meant. I hardly shed tears. A common complaint I have heard is that I do not show emotion very easily and apparently that makes me unpredictable and frightening. So my issue is emotional, but not in the way you were thinking.

>>935904358
>you should not even seek a relationship if you're actively seeking codependency
why not?

>>935900832
yes. throughout history, only about 40% of the humans reproduced. but in the west that is down now to some 20 % or some horrifically low shit.

>>935904951
Only about 40% of men have reproduced. 80% of women historically did

>>935904951
The cost of progress, Anon. If you were in a different position you wouldn't even notice it, maybe even think everything is going well and as it should.

>>935904443
>. I hardly shed tears
Not the issue. The issue isn't that you're aloof emotionally it's that you're internally afraid or anxious of rejection. You not being able to express emotion can be any number of things but, again, it's due to emotional imbalance on your part. A woman isn't going to fix that

>>935904459
A relationship built on codependency is how 90% of dysfunctional relationships start. A partner should be a gift not a requirement for your emotional well being. You want a partner to love you, not fix or control you. You want a partner thats emotionally stable not one whose instability can cause you harm. Romantic love is not therapy or a spiritual journey to find some kind of meaning or catharsis in life it's just a partnership, and that partnership being positive means both need to flourish. A codependent relationship is always one taking from the other because they can't stand on their own two feet. Entering a relationship looking for that is not going to fix you, it's going to make everything worse for both people.

>shill has to actually think
>gives up and starts a new demoralization thread

>>935904289
>the family is more important than this gender war bullshit you fall into
Hey boomer wake up, the family doesn't mean shit. The reason the "family" is dying today is because women can make their own money and have as much casual sex as they want. They don't need a man to cosign on opening a bank account for them, and they aren't restricted to working baby jobs anymore. They aren't dependent on a man to provide for them anymore. THAT is why the birth rate is fucked in the West, not whatever retardation you believe it is. Open your eyes

>>935905434
>statistics
Yeah that's what I figured. It's a bad faith term anyways since psychology owns it. You get to look at only bad examples and say that's the thing itself, but actually that's just a terrible interpretation. The thing which the term codependency takes its qualities from is a beautiful human behavior which kept families together for centuries and still does.
Also, the line for what is considered dysfunctional slides farther and farther all the time which is quite sinister if you think about it. We are now at a point where dysfunction isn't even tested if someone's diagnosis claims it. A dysfunctional person could never be tested in their entire life believing its true. And if they believe that, it's a guarantee that they will be dysfunctional.

My point is, psychologists do not get to decide what love is and what love isn't, nor what a partnership is and isn't. That's an undeniable truth. Philosophers did a much better and earnest job of understanding the thing itself and at least they were aware of their own fallibility and made it an aware part of their works or took it for granted that people generally knew that.

>>935905771
>women are independent now and dont want babies
I agree, some women are genetic dead ends and dont deserve a family, like you.

>>935905771
>The reason the "family" is dying today is because women can make their own money and have as much casual sex as they want.
And this will result in even more overt slavery as cultures, which do value family, continue to encroach upon the west.

>>935905771
>Hey boomer wake up,
I'm 26 my dude , the family is everything. The reason why women go out to work and worship the concept of sacrificing their time to find self fulfillment in a job is a cultural phenomenon stemming from the deracination from western culture , which revolved around the family unit. Not the nuclear family either, it goes beyond that. Men and women had a duty that revolved around the family, now it's simply consumerism and the material. It's a spiritual issue, something you're never going to understand as long as you keep yourself in that same kind of mindset of "men vs women". Women in ancient cultures weren't restricted to just being baby makers either, they've arguably always had jobs that were required to support the family out of necessity or were part of a class that was expected to work regardless of their gender.

The entire concept of history you operate under is the same lie that justifies this society, and you're restricted to bitching about it like a little boy on the internet

>>935905861
>boomer thinks it's just "some women"
Majority of women are projected to be childless in the next few decades but yep, it's just "some" women that are like this.

>>935905792
>Philosophers did a much better and earnest job of understanding the thing itself
The concept of codependency goes back to the ancient Greek concept of eudamonia my dude, and I wasn't citing any statistics either. Codependency is when a partner exists to justify the dysfunction of their partner for various emotional reasons, which keeps people in a state that does not allow either partner eudamonia, or to flourish. You should look up ancient Greek concepts of love

>>935906072
>It's a spiritual issue
You're a faggot.
>they've arguably always had jobs that were required to support the family
Yeah bro women have always had jobs and been able to be breadwinners, oh wait no they fucking haven't. Why do you just resort to making up bullshit?
>and you're restricted to bitching about it like a little boy on the internet
Projecting, suck my balls

>>935906072
I'm happy to see young people figuring this out. I gave up on my generation because it was difficult not to while being excluded from every conversation due to my beliefs.
That's how much they hate us though, later generations will go back to traditional values or rediscover them. But people want us gone because of what they think we are and none of these consequences are insurmountable.

>>935906327
>later generations will go back to traditional values or rediscover them
Why do you think that is? It's because they had utility for keeping us, mainly women, in line.

>>935906181
The concept of codependency, the thing, but not the word which was coined in, just guessing, the 1970s or even earlier in the 20th century.
>thinks I meant any specific statistics when they gave a general guess percentage
You reason for believing that, is statistic.
What you keep saying is what the word codependency means, but it's a manifestation. You're basically treating symptoms instead of injury with your way of thinking about it.

>>935900937
Women's rights aren't going back in the bottle. So we might as well accept it, and just start identifying disposable males as young as possible so resources aren't wasted on them trying to compete. Force feminize the compliant ones, and dispose of the rest. Historical evidence shows that getting rid of disposable males has a positive impact on literally every aspect of society, and almost completely limits warfare. Let women fight among themselves for the top 20% of men who matter. The rest of you just don't.

Absolutely nobody would have a problem if all the surviving males who weren't fit to breed looked like this. The feminization or disposable of the bottom 80% men is the inevitable future. You just aren't good enough. Be a girl, and you can at least be useful for a little while.

>>935906181
Maybe go look up what eudamonia actually means too.

>>935906461
>thread is being flooded with trans fetish shit now
Fuck off

>>935901127
And this is IF they can even organize. Right not its like they're just being suffocated slowly.

>>935906527
No. Feminization is the only acceptable solution to the problem of the unfit disposable male.
1. Women's rights aren't going to be taken away.
2. Women aren't ever going to compromise, and when women are left free to make their own choices they only care about the top 20% of men.
3. We aren't going to kill the bottom 80% of men.
4.If the bottom 80% of men don't get women, they destabilize society, start wars, and generally ruin everything for everyone.

What we need is a solution where the bottom 80% of men are removed from play, so the women can focus on the men they actually care about. The only possible solution to this that doesn't involve killing men in job lots, is to feminize the ones who don't measure up. That way they can be useful members of society as servants and cocksleeves, and aren't going to bother women with their stub standard genetics. You have to do SOMETHING with the disposable males. So what do you plan to do with them that follows the rules in 1-4?

>>935906955
That's this crop, but what about the next one? Or the one after that? Or after that? How long will men be lead to resentment before they no longer accept it? I think with the way culture and the genome are progressing, maybe they're already born.

>>935907149
>women are terrorists
cool escalation
you seem foreign

>>935907149
>Women's rights aren't going to be taken away.
I'm afraid it's already happening, didn't women cry about Roe vs Wade being overturned a couple of years ago?

>>935907182
>women are terrorists
He's right tho

They are

>>935907149
>What we need is a solution where the bottom 80% of men are removed from play
>confuses patterns for static states
Jesus Christ, I wish I was alive to see the sins of the father manifest on that one if this is what people believe.

>>935906461
Kill yourself kike

>>935907411
Really is such a kike move to slide the conversation in this way.

>>935907263
brownoids wouldn't know american news

Do you know why you hate incels so much? Why you feel the need to make these threads to express it? Because you feel like they are making you do this, and you feel bad thinking and doing these things to them. "If only they lived differently, I wouldn't have to bully them and want them to die! If only they didn't blame me for the things I do!" You've been fooled, we all have. Get over it.

>>935901630
and men like that have 10 kids and fuck dozens of women so?

>>935900403
This is /b, this thread will be gone before I post this. You aren't right, but you are effectively are. Culture has (or lacks) mechanical advantage. The cultures that dominated and expanded were the cultures that could wring the most effort out of men. Trick men into not fucking off. Specifically men. Western culture has removed or is removing all of the features that kept men willing to engage, so men are reacting appropriately and enjoying their time instead of grinding for all the cultural reasons that no longer exist. Tada, feminism!

>>935905434
>afraid of rejection
Actually it's a metaphysical bit of retardation. I asked plenty of women out but I hardly ever got a date, never a second date. I accepted that if I'm ever coupled it won't be me initiating it. This was... maybe about 20 instances over the course of 10 years. Also, never matched with anyone on tinder so I ditched it. after a year.

>>935911947
>This is /b, this thread will be gone before I post this
it's not 2009
some /b/ threads last over 30 hours now
/b/ was never good, but at one time it was, at least, popular
not anymore, though
say la vee

>>935913191
unpopular /b/ is good for society, bad for losers
back to the status quo

>>935900169 (OP)
> work is a prison like housewifing
Haha funny you mention that, ask me about structuring my entire life around my job while it sucks my lifeforce until I'm an empty husk

>>935918276
Try being born wealthy next time. It's much better.

If you are poor it's because God wants you to be, so I suggest you spend this time figuring out what you've done to offend God. Maybe next time you'll have learned your lesson.

>>935913191
Nowadays you have to solve the stupidest possible fucking captchas and wait for countdown timers to be able to do anything though. It's amazing anyone is still here. Why are you still here? Why am I still here?

>>935900169 (OP)
OP answer this though. Would you want to be married to a woman who under the surface wishes she could be getting fucked by a 6'4 bigdick mcbigjaw? Would you want to commit your life to being with a person who is just settling for you?

>>935918631
the captchas do suck, but i think that's only a small part of why the userbase has shrunk so much
as for why i'm still here, it's a combination of loneliness, habit, autism, and the fact that i can mostly express myself here, with some exceptions
i'd be banned from any mainstream social media on day 1

>>935919703
I can't even remember when I actually joined here, but I think it was around 2008. Back then I was a newfag. I guess once a newfag, always a newfag. /b/ has always been shit, but lately it's been even shittier shit. I honestly don't know what hiroshimoot wants to do with this site, but if he wants to lose users the captchas are the easiest way do do that. I still come here out of force of habit. I guess I should never forget, once you're here, you're here forever.