>There is no moral code, do what you want, question everything. Reject society's norms.
>But uhh, transphobia, racism, intolerance, and female circumcision are indisputably wrong though.

>>936231788 (OP)
God I hate this shit more than words can describe.

>>936231788 (OP)

>>936232130

>>936231788 (OP)
>There is no moral code, do what you want, question everything. Reject society's norms.
Stupid strawman, the left has a strict moral code: Every human has a right live and express themselves, as long as that doesn't infrince on other people's rights. And no there is no right to have gay free streets.

>>936232215
well i just plain ol disagree with that. realistically half of all humans are bigoted in some manner, are they not entitled to free speech? and who decides what and what isint a right?

>>936232215
The left doesn’t believe in the right to free expression, like, at all… censorship is their first instinct.

>>936231788 (OP)

Liberals preach moral relativism and moral facts at the same time depending on whichever one is more convenient. When you want your law passed they tell you morality is subjective, personal, relative, and can't be forced onto others. But when they want their law passed, moral facts suddenly exist and are non-negotiable. If you ask any questions you're a Nazi. Which is bad.

>>936232384

When liberals use the word "freedom". They mean freedom to be a liberal. Freedom to listen to this mumble rapper over that mumble rapper. In liberalism you don't have the freedom to be a non-liberal.

"I'm tolerant of everything unless I claim it's intolerant of me. Then it's not allowed to exist." Wow how original. You realize this is literally the same exact thing everyone else who's ever existed has also preached? Saudi Arabia, North Korea. You rely on the same exact blind brute force as literally every other regime that's ever existed. The only difference is you look like an ugly tranny. Whereas those other regimes had some badass aesthetics. You're not special. You have no moral, metaphysical, or spiritual high ground.

"I'm tolerant to everyone except the intolerant". Who gets to decide what the default thing is that everything must revolve around and if something is perceived as being intolerant of this default thing it shouldn't be tolerated? Power. That's what. Well guess what? I don't respect your power.

I have a question for all the "tolerant" people here. Name one group or idea you fundamentally disagree with or even view as dangerous but believe society should tolerate to grow, fester, multiply, and propagate itself. You can't. At the end of the day you only tolerate what you agree with.

If your tolerance only applies to ideas you already approve of, then it’s not tolerance -- it's just preference dressed up to sound noble.

You have no moral or intellectual high ground you ugly lying faggot.

>>936232384
nta but they arent aguing against free speech, they are encouraging it.
>Every human has a right live and express themselves, as long as that doesn't infrince on other people's rights.
people dont need to be uniform or conform to a strict dogma. rather, there are many different ways that people can simply be. and there can still be harmony through our differences. but, if you in your state of being disregard or intentionally worsen someone's right to live through discrimination, that is what is considered unacceptable.
in other words, just dont be a dick lol
>>936232461
what do you see as censorship?

>You're not allowed to believe people have different genes because of where they're from and who their parents are. And you're not allowed to believe that their genes determine what kind of personality, character, or traits in life especially if it's black people.

How did this become unquestionable religious dogma. Oh yeah the Jews.

>>936232461
Homie you got a president who's trying to deny legal entry to the country based on political views. If you think the left is the only group that wants to censor things they don't like, you haven't actually looked at the things your own side doesn't want you to say.

>>936232929
> what do you see as censorship?
Shit like this tbh: >>936232938

>>936232939
Ok fine but don’t say you’re in favor of freedom of expression when you’re clearly not.

>>936232938

Freedom of poopoo

>>936233041
>Niggers are violent animals
So we agree?

>>936232384
We aren't unga bunga club and loincloth people anymore. There is a difference between having opinions about people you don't like and acting on those opinions.

The problem with free speech is that a phrase like 'black people are more aggressive than white people' is true in general, people can't just say it as something that is true and must be dealt with. Instead, it is used as an excuse to paint all black people as violent and less-than, which is bad for everyone because we all have to live together and life is objectively worse if you have to fist fight your roomate or neighbor every day instead of just coexisting with them.

Also, we've been thinking about necessary rights for a long time. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are pretty solid basics.

>>936232908
/thread

>>936232979
>Shit like this tbh: >>936232938
alright i dont wanna be reactionary but lemme ask you this: WHEN HAS ANYONE SAID THIS????

>>936233155
They're simply more capable of violence than you. Don't congratulate yourself for your weakness and cowardice

>>936232938
This is nonsense though. Human genes have such a wide range of expression, any retard understands that you can't look at someone and say, "Ah yes, a recognizeable phenotype. I know everything about this person!"

Does black culture strongly emphasize responding to disrespect with escalation? Yes. How about Japanese culture? White trash culture?

Do black people not trust the authorities? No. So they're just like all the minority groups who get shit on, and like most of the people not rich enough to loophole the system for personal gain.

I could keep going, but the point here is that the issue isn't believing people are different because of their genes or their culture or whatever, its when you boil all the nuance out of it and turn it into a moral statement that treats every individual as equal to the worst representations of their group.

Liberals see conservatives as a bunch of selfish, illiterate morans waiving guns and putting on pointy white hats on the weekend. What, honestly, is the difference between doing that and what you do when you think of black people?

>>936233441
So are bears but we don’t live alongside them for that very reason.

>>936232929
again i just disagree with that notion. i dont give a fuck if i worsen another groups quality of life i believe in doing whats best for your kind. obiously something like genocide or imperialism is different but if the jeets and spics are affected negativly by being deported thats too bad. if jews are negativly being affected by being forced into re education camps thats too bad

>>936233480
You're just weaker than them, and that makes you insecure. You're less overtly aggressive due to your weakness, not due to superior morality or self control

>>936232215
> Every human has a right live and express themselves, as long as that doesn't infrince on other people's rights.
Absolutely asinine. No clear definition of “rights” and no framework for what to do about competing rights. Inevitable totalitarianism if adopted.

>>936233567
I’m also weaker and less violent than a bear or a gorilla, hence why I don’t let one live inside my house.

>>936232996
I am in favor of freedom of expression. I don't care if you've got the shittiest, hottest take in the known universe. I don't care if you dress like Helen Keller's personal mannequin. I don't care if you kiss the homies good night before you head out.

I just want people to be generally respectful and collaborative. We live in a society, the goal is to build and improve, not to break it all back down into shitty tribal bullshit.

>>936233636
Who said they have to live in your house? The whole world isn't your house

>>936232215
I express myself as a biological woman by competing athletically against other biological women. What now nigger?

>>936233678
I wouldn’t even let a bear into the city for my own safety and everyone else’s. Why are niggers any different?

>>936233727
Why not just accept your inferiority? And who are you to "let" them go anywhere? They'll just do as they please and you'll say things behind their back. Why not start the race war you want? Afraid of the consequences?

>>936233790
Because I don’t want to be assaulted by feral niggers and I don’t want that for my kids. Pretty simple.

>>936233790
He’s not afraid of niggers, he’s afraid of his own traitorous government taking their side because fighting and fear is good for (((business)))

>>936233161
Well because we know it's a simplified truth, because it has nothing to do with the color of your skin but your socioeconomic standing. That's why white poof fags can be just as much of a nigger than people with dark skin growing up in though surroundings.
But predominantly black neighborhoods still have worse education possibilities and with that less opportunities for breaking the circle.
Therefore if someone says black people are more aggressive that's not true, because it implies a causation between skin color and aggressiveness the actual truth is, desperate people are more aggressive, out of desperation.

>>936233986
>We can solve poverty by being racist.
Room temp iq over here.

>>936233552
That other group are still people of your kind though, we are all human.

>>936233710
Do what you want but don't expect others to cater to your definition of woman.

>>936234027
Not at all what I said.
More like it's poverty, not race that's the problem we need to address poverty and stop discussing it in a racial context.

>>936233986
Nope, black people are on average more violent and less intelligent even when controlling for income. Middle class blacks are more prone to criminality than poor whites.

>>936234175
I'm going to need scientific evidence for that bold claim.

>>936233836
But you want to assault them. Hypocrite. You want someone else to do the assaulting for you.
>>936233876
What are you, his boyfriend? Why would he want to assault

>>936234207
No, I just don’t want to live around them.

>>936234175
I'm sure that has nothing to do with racial profiling ...

>>936234051

>>936234229
The go dig a hole on the beach, lay in it and wait for the flood.

>>936234200
Do you need scientific evidence to support the claim that niggers are oppressed by white people?

>>936234262
Could you please not post the contents of your masturbation folder faggot? I'm not here for your faggot porn.
I mean you do you but at least get consent before you show your wanking material to other non gay people.

>>936234229
Then stay in your mother's basement

>>936234329
Of course. That's where my opinion is coming from scientific knowledge.

>>936234075
>your definition of woman
>your
What’s it like having brain damage?

>>936231788 (OP)

>Question everything!
>Except worshiping niggers. Those are our sacred beasts.

>>936234381
Are you trans tranny?

>>936234380
Ok. Where is the evidence? Show it.

>>936234381
I don't know, thats something only you could tell me, but thinking faster than your finger can type is a hassle.

>>936233552
>i dont give a fuck if i worsen another groups quality of life i believe in doing whats best for your kind.
>if the jeets and spics are affected negativly by being deported thats too bad
whether you care or not, it does have an imapct on you and "your kind". what happens then when your kind outs you for not being enough like them? all thats left is you on the outskirts, rejected by the people you think of others

>>936234394
Treating them as fellow human beings isn't worshiping them. But thanks for admitting that you worship them and want to be sexually dominated by them

>>936231788 (OP)
No moral code? Bet, in that case I'm going to kill any fucking "conservatives" who can't mind their business and stay out of my way.

>>936234466
There is always throte clogging

>>936234517
Wanting to keep trannies out of female bathrooms isn't their business?

>>936234538
It smells.

>>936234569
Whatever you're upset about isn't my problem, and of you try to make it my problem I will kill you. Is that clear enough? I don't care about your culture war crusade.

>>936231788 (OP)
"Do what you want, I do what I want, don't hurt others. Morality is relative to individuals"

"These irrational beliefs that tangibly hurt people are, in my opinion, dogshit"

Subjectivism is dumb, but that's a bad argument

>>936233067
freedom of fapping to hentai

>>936234396
No. The liberal faggot I’m arguing with is insisting that the definition of women that everyone has used and agreed upon from the beginning of time up until about five minutes ago is “my” definition and not immutable biological reality.

>>936234289
No, if you love them so much you can live alongside them and get robbed, I’m good.

>>936234352
No, I want to go outside and live in a city free of subhuman bio trash.

>>936234200
The data does back it up. I've had plenty of arguments against racists on here, and everything points toward the conclusion that its something more than socioeconomic position.

Blacks from wealthy backgrounds underperform compared to white and asian peers in school. Could be a raw intelligence problem. Could be a difference in how they express intelligence which doesn't translate to good grades. Could even be that the social pressures a black kid faces at a school that is 98% white hurt their performance.

African american neighborhoods tend to have higher crime rates regardless of poverty levels, although whether that's because african americans just do more crimes or because the poor blacks are more tolerated in middle income black areas and they do crime because of the poverty desperation is less well controlled for.

The data is there, but it is hard to make definitive statements because there are lots of variables that are hard to control for.

>>936234569
No none of them are women, since according to them women belong to the kitchen.

>>936234569
Not really, no. There's no good reason to be gatekeeping bathrooms because you think 'the wrong sort' is using them. The argument is that trans women are just men, and like all men they cannot for one instant stop themselves from raping women and children when the opportunity arises. Which is a wild view for the conservatives to have, since they don't like the feminist all men are rapists line in general. Like, honestly, even if we had unisex bathrooms, most people are just going in, using the bathroom, and leaving. If we hadn't made a man being in the woman's bathroom such a tremendous social taboo, nobody would give a fuck. As it stands, most women don't give a fuck if a guy is in their bathroom to use the bathroom. They give even less of a fuck if they think its just an ugly woman.

There's not much difference between deciding someone isn't 'a woman' enough to use a bathroom than deciding someone isn't white enough to use a drinking fountain. Its not based in any reason, just arbitrary vibes based nonsense and good old fashioned bigotry

>>936235058
Notable that this difference in criminology only bears out in the united states, meaning this is the result of some kind of fucked up cultural issue the US has with black people and not actually anything to do with being black.

>>936234730
Your definition of a woman was "plays sports", nignog. Bad faith, hyperbolistic ass argument.

Literally name ONE thing that is universal among all women. Women is an idea, a general vibe based on expected appearance and behavior, which virtually no woman fully represents, and they all do it in different ways. The fact that there are biological women out there you'd be sure were just wimpy dudes and biological men you'd be real happy you pulled at the bar until the dick flopped out just proves that.

>>936231788 (OP)
chatbot write os model

>>936235308
That's why the conservatards change it from all men a rapists to all trans women are rapist, this way they can just distance themselves from the horrible truth about many of their peers and at the same time have a scape goat as a enemy to unite against.
Completely mental, but that's how it is.

>>936235308
It would be more respectable if they pulled off their bathroom rapes as men, but they are being so underhanded by using their female tranny disguise. It's the trickery of it all.

>>936235308
That is bullshit. All women care about that. Don't speak for them.

>>936235808
isn't transphobia actually good? because you can't accept trans people as they are unless you first denormalize them, just like how you can't accept anons as they are, but can do the same for incest.

>>936238301
Kill yourself, chud

dutr

>>936231788 (OP)
>defending female circumcision
??? I can see why your shit thread is about to 404. Sage.