>>936234667 (OP)
Dude I dislike him too, but to have the faces of two babies showing who have nothing to do with things. My guy, you’re very low. And this isn’t free range b like it used to be, this might catch you a serious ban for doing this
>>936234746
Babies all look the same. Do you think some anon is going to try to track down two random babies because he's just discovered that they exist?