>>936234667 (OP) Dude I dislike him too, but to have the faces of two babies showing who have nothing to do with things. My guy, youโre very low. And this isnโt free range b like it used to be, this might catch you a serious ban for doing this
>>936234746 Babies all look the same. Do you think some anon is going to try to track down two random babies because he's just discovered that they exist?